Skip to main content
Log in

Pulling it all together: Meeting varying training requirements on national, state, and university levels for marriage and family therapy education

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marriage and family therapy programs face many challenge in trying to meet different sets of criteria including national, state, and university requirements. State regulation of the marriage and family therapy profession is a much sought after commodity. Currently 22 states have some type of MFT licensure or certification. MFT regulation criteria established by states to restrict title and function can differ in varying degrees from criteria established by the AAMFT's Commission on Accreditation. At the university level, MFT programs continue to be housed in a variety of schools including social work, education, psychology and home economics, as universities attempt to define a proper place for family therapy training. Confusion exists about whether MFT is a separate discipline or a specialization of another profession. The task of pulling it all together is addressed using one program's experience as an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Christensen, D., Brown, J., Rickert, V., & Turner, J. (1989) Rethinking what it means to specialize in MFT at the master's level.Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 15, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family Therapy Education (1988).Manual on Accreditation, Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, C. (1979). The master's degree in marriage and family therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 5, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, M., & Gilbert, R. (1989). Master's degree programs in marital and family therapy: An evaluation of admission and program requirements.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 337–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. J. (1990). Family therapy training: The rising tide of mediocrity.American Family Therapy Association Newsletter, 40, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., Huber, J., & Hardy, K. (1988). Accreditation: What constitutes appropriate marriage and family therapy education?Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, W., Nichols, D., and Hardy, K. (1990). Supervision in family therapy: A decade restudy,Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J., & Utesch, B. (1990). Dancing to Two Drummers, the BBSE and AAMFT.The California Therapist, 6, 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Utesch, W.E., Patterson, J.E. Pulling it all together: Meeting varying training requirements on national, state, and university levels for marriage and family therapy education. Contemp Fam Ther 13, 371–380 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897876

Keywords

Navigation