Abstract
By placing so much emphasis on systemic thinking, marriage and family therapists have lost sight of the individual within the system. One of the limits of a systemic therapy is its capacity to deal with problems in intimacy, a central problem in marital therapy. A knowledge of individual development is crucial for family therapists. The two themes dealt with in this paper are 1) some concepts of self psychology which can be useful in understanding the fear of intimacy, and 2) at what point, in couples' therapy, it is advisable to shift to individual therapy for one or both partners.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacal, H. A., & Newman, K. M. (1990).Theories of object relations: Bridges to self psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Balint, M. (1968).The basic fault. London: Tavistock.
Bowen, M. (1966). The use of family theory in clinical practice.Comprehensive Psychiatry, 7, 345–374.
Coady, N. F. (1992). Rationale and directions for an increased emphasis on the therapeutic relationship in family therapy.Contemporary Family Therapy, 14, 467–479.
Cohler, B. (1980). Developmental perspectives on the psychology of the self in early childhood. In A. Goldberg (Ed.),Advances in self psychology (pp. 69–115). New York: International Universities Press.
Dare, C. (1986). Psychoanalytic marital therapy. In N. S. Jacobsen & A. S. Gurman (Eds.),Clinical handbook of marital therapy (pp. 13–28). New York: Guilford Press.
Dicks, H. (1963). Object relations theory and marital studies.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 36, 125–129.
Dicks, H. (1967).Marital tensions. New York: Basic Books.
Duncan, B. L., & Parks, B. M. (1988). Integrating individual and systems approaches: Strategic-behavioral therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 151–161.
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Object relationships and dynamic structure. In W. R. D. Fairbarn (Ed.),Psychoanalytic studies of the personality (pp. 137–151). London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Feldman, R. B., & Guttman, H. A. (1984). Families of borderline patients: Literalminded parents, borderline parents, and parental protectiveness.American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 1392–1396.
Fisch, R., Weakland, J., & Segal, L. (1983).The tactics of change: Doing therapy briefly. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gaston, L. (1990). The concept of the alliance and its role in psychotherapy: Theoretical and empirical considerations.Psychotherapy, 27, 143–153.
Giovacchini, P. (1965). Treatment of marital disharmonies: The classical approach. In B. L. Greene (Ed.),The psychotherapies of marital disharmony (pp. 39–82). New York: The Free Press.
Green, R. J., & Herget, M. (1991). Outcomes of systemic/strategic team consultation: III. The importance of therapist warmth and active structuring.Family Process, 30, 321–336.
Guntrip, H. (1971).Psychoanalytic theory, therapy and the self. London: Hogarth Press.
Guttman, H. A. (1991). Systems theory, cybernetics, and epistemology. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.),Handbook of family therapy, Volume II (pp. 41–62). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Haley, J. (1976).Problem solving therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Haley, J. (1981).Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Hoffman, L. (1981).Foundations of family therapy. New York: Basic Books.
Israelstam, K. V. (1989). Interacting individual belief systems in marital therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 53–63.
Jackson, D. D. (1957). The question of family homeostasis.The Psychiatric Quarterly Supplement, 31, 79–90.
Kohut, H. (1971).The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
Kohut, H. (1977).The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
Lansky, M. R. (1980). On blame.International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 8, 429–456.
Lansky, M. R. (1985). Preoccupation as a mode of pathologic distance regulation.International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 11, 409–425.
Mashal, M., Feldman, R. B., & Sigal, J. J. (1989). The unraveling of a treatment paradigm: A follow-up study of the Milan approach to family therapy.Family Process, 28, 457–470.
Nichols, M. (1987).The self in the system. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Scharff, D. E., & Scharff, J. S. (1987).Object relations family therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Scharff, J. S. (1991).Foundations of object relations family therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Selvini-Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cechin, G., & Prata, G. (1978).Paradox and counterparadox. New York: Jason Aronson.
Slipp, S. (1984).Object relations: A dynamic bridge between individual and family treatment. New York: Jason Aronson.
Slipp, S. (1989). A differing viewpoint for integrating psycho-dynamic and systems approaches.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 13–16.
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1980).The dynamics of psychological development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Todd, T. C. (1986). Structural-strategic therapy. In N. Jacobson & A. Gurman (Eds.),Handbook of marital therapy (pp. 71–105). New York: Guilford Press.
Wachtel, E. F. (1987). Family systems and individual child.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 15–25.
Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974).Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: W.W. Norton.
Willi, J. (1984). The concept of collusion: A theoretical framework for marital and family therapy.Family Process, 23, 177–185.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965).The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.
Zinner, J. (1976). The implications of projective identification for marital interaction. In H. Grunbaum & J. L. Christ (Eds.),Contemporary marriage: Structure, dynamics and therapy (pp. 293–308). Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braverman, S. The limits of systems therapy: The problem of intimacy. Contemp Fam Ther 15, 285–297 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897759
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897759