Advertisement

Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 252–262 | Cite as

Once a princess, always a princess: A strategy for therapy with families of rape victims

  • Leslie L. Feinauer
  • Debbie L. Hippolite
Article

Abstract

Reconstitutive interventions for victims of rape involve more than discussion of cognitive and emotional responses to the traumatic events of the rape and the post-traumatic anxiety and depression. Many victims and families of victims are not able to reconstruct a supportive functional system after they have been violated by rape. This paper presents a strategic ritual which can be used with the raped family to facilitate this reorganization and restitution of their integrity.

Through the use of a short metaphorical story and symbolic ritual, each individual member and the family as a whole can experience, reexperience, and redecide how they will respond to this traumatic event through open expression of their emotions and responses. Reintegration of their responses and shared life crisis enable them to respond to one another in ways not open to them previously.

Keywords

Health Psychology Social Issue Traumatic Event Emotional Response Individual Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Danesh, H. B. (1977). Anger and fear. American Journal of Psychiatry,134(10).Google Scholar
  2. Feinauer, L.L. (1986).Long term effects of sexual abuse.Google Scholar
  3. Feinauer, L. L. (1982). Rape: A family crisis.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 10(4), 35–39.Google Scholar
  4. Hardy, B. (1973).Rituals and feelings in the novels of George Eliot. University College of Swansea.Google Scholar
  5. Holmstrom, L. L., & Burgess, A. W. (1977). Assessing trauma in the rape victim. In D. R. Nass (Ed.),The rape victim (pp. 45–57). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  6. Libow, J. A., & Doty, D. W. (1979). An exploratory approach to self-blame and selfderogation by rape victims.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(4), 670–679.Google Scholar
  7. Notman, M. T., & Nadelson, C. C. (1977). The rape victim: Psychodynamic considerations. In D. R. Nass (Ed.),The rape victim (pp. 58–65). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  8. Papp, P. (1980). The Greek chorus and other techniques of paradoxical therapy.Family Process, 19, 45–57.Google Scholar
  9. Rabkin, J. B. (1979). Epidemiology of forcable rape.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(4), 510–511.Google Scholar
  10. Russell, D. E. H. (1984).Sexual exploitation. Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Silverman, D. C. (1978). Sharing the crisis of rape.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48(1), 166–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie L. Feinauer
    • 1
  • Debbie L. Hippolite
    • 1
  1. 1.Marriage and Family Therapy ProgramBrigham Young UniversityProvo

Personalised recommendations