Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 65–71 | Cite as

Reply to “interpreting and testing compositional data” by Alex Woronow, Karen M. Love, and John C. Butler

  • John Aitchison
Letter To The Editor

Keywords

Karen Compositional Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitchison, J., 1986a, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Chapman and Hall, London, 416 p.Google Scholar
  2. Aitchison, J., 1986b, CODA, A Microcomputer Package for the Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Chapman and Hall, London, 84 p.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, P. F., 1981, Distinction Between Permian and Post-Permian Igneous Rocks in the Southern Sydney Basin, New South Wales, on the Basis of Major-Element Geochemistry: Math. Geol., v. 13, p. 193–200.Google Scholar
  4. Chayes, F. and Kruskal, W., 1966, An Approximate Statistical Test for Correlations between Proportions: J. Geol., v. 74, p. 692–702.Google Scholar
  5. Woronow, A., 1987, Review of The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (J. Aitchison): Math. Geol., v. 19, p. 579–591.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Aitchison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations