Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 589–604 | Cite as

Mononodal indicator variography—Part I: Theory

  • I. C. Lemmer
Articles
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

For any distribution of grades, a particular cutoff grade is shown here to exist at which the indicator covariance is proportional to the grade covariance to a very high degree of accuracy. The name “mononodal cutoff” is chosen to denote this grade. Its importance for robust grade variography in the presence of a large coefficient of variation—typical of precious metals—derives from the fact that the mononodal indicator variogram is then linearly related to the grade variogram yet is immune to outlier data and is found to be particularly robust under data information reduction. Thus, it is an excellent substitute to model in lieu of a difficult grade variogram. A theoretical expression for the indicator covariance is given as a double series of orthogonal polynomials that have the grade density function as weight function. Leading terms of this series suggest that indicator and grade covariances are first-order proportional, with cutoff grade dependence being carried by the proportionality factor. Kriging equations associated with this indicator covariance lead to cutoff-free kriging weights that are identical to grade kriging weights. This circumstance simplifies indicator kriging used to estimate local point-grade histograms, while at the same time obviating order relations problems.

Key words

robust variography indicator kriging spatial distribution estimation order relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckmann, P., 1973, Orthogonal polynomials for engineers and physicists: The Golem Press, Boulder, Colorado, 280 p.Google Scholar
  2. Erdélyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., and Tricomi, F. G., 1953, Higher Transcendental Functions, v. II: McGraw-Hill, New York, 396 p.Google Scholar
  3. Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, Ch. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p. (Second reprint, 1981)Google Scholar
  4. Journel, A. G., 1983, Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions: Math. Geology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 445–468.Google Scholar
  5. Journel, A. G., 1984, The Place of nonparametric geostatistics,in Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: D. Reidel, Dordrecht (Holland), part 1, p. 307–335.Google Scholar
  6. Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A., 1969, The advanced theory of statistics, v. I., 3rd ed.: Griffin and Co., London, 439 p.Google Scholar
  7. Magnus, W. and Oberhettinger, F., 1949, Formulas and theorems for the functions of mathematical physics: Chelsea, New York, 172 p.Google Scholar
  8. Matheron, G., 1975a, A simple substitute for conditional expectation: Disjunctive kriging, NATO Advanced Study Institute Proceedings: D. Reidel, Dordrecht (Holland), p. 221–236.Google Scholar
  9. Matheron, G., 1975b, Forecasting block grade distributions: The transfer functions, NATO Advanced Study Institute Proceedings: D. Reidel, Dordrecht (Holland), p. 237–251.Google Scholar
  10. Matheron, G., 1982, La destructuration des hautes teneurs et le krigeage des indicatrices: Note N-761, Fontainebleau/CGMM.Google Scholar
  11. Verly, G., 1984, The Block distribution given a point multivariate normal distribution,in Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: D. Reidel, Dordrecht (Holland), part 1, p. 495–515.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. C. Lemmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Management Services DivisionGold Fields of South AfricaJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations