Abstract
Constructivism's ontology-based epistemology considers “reality” an expression of strictly subjective cognitive processes. Taking the conceptpower as an example, theeigen-dynamics of connecting these subjective constructions of reality in the socialization process are compared with this ontological epistemology. The qualities of such dynamics cannot be concluded from ontology. An alternative approach is taken here which proceeds from a sociological orientation, describes the structure and dynamics of power relations in the differentiation process of social systems, and applies to families and family therapy for an example. The conclusion draws attention to the necessity of a critical notion of power to permit discussion of ethical questions in the context of systems theory as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateson, G.: Oekologie des Geistes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1981.
Bateson, G.: Geist und Natur. Eine notwendige Einheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1984.
Dell, P.: Von systemischer zur klinischen Epistemologie I. Von Bateson zu Maturana. Zeitschrift fiver systemische Therapie, 2(7), 147–171, 1984.
Levold, T.: Eigige gedaken uber den nutzen einer theorie autopoietischer systeme fur eine fur klinische epistemology. Zeitschrift fur systemische therapie 2(7), 173–189, 1984.
Maturana, H. G.: Erkennen: Die organization and Verkorperung von Wirklichkeit. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg, 1982.
Rapaport, A.: Konflict in der vom mensched gemachten umweit. Darmstaldt (n.d.).
Simon, F., &Stierlin, H.: Die sprache er familientherapie. Ein Vokabular. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1984.
Weber, M.: Soziologische grundbegriffe. Tubinger, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Originally published as part of a special issue on “the power metaphor” guestedited by Klaus G. Deissler inZeitschrift fur systemische Therapie (1986),4, 243–252. Translated by S. Awodey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levold, T. The therapy of power and the power of therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 10, 84–97 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896588
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896588