Mathematical Geology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 343–366 | Cite as

Using geology to control geostatistics in the Hellyer deposit

  • G. J. McArthur


The Hellyer orebody, a polymetallic massive sulfide deposit, was discovered in western Tasmania by Aberfoyle in 1983. Delineation diamond drilling was carried out in 1984 on a nominal 50-m square grid pattern to outline the resource. Resource estimation methods were influenced by the requirement to develop a regular block model for conceptual mine planning studies. Detailed geological interpretation indicates that the interpolation technique must take into account several important features to retain geological credibility. The deposit has sharp limits defined by visual geological contacts with virtually barren enclosing rocks. Lateral terminations are rapid with no interfingering internal waste. The dip and strike are variable and a major fault with a measurable displacement cuts acutely through the center of the deposit. Ore grades are reasonably correlateable within specific layers from hole to hole indicating a significant across-dip anisotropy. A hanging wall enriched zone is well-defined throughout the deposit. To overcome the variable geometry problems, a stratigraphic coordinate system was defined arbitrarily to replace the normal z coordinate. This allowed variography in stratigraphic layers. Blocks to be estimated were constrained by hand-drawn and subsequently digitized hanging wall and footwall contours. Each block was ascribed a stratigraphic coordinate by calculating its spatial position in relation to nearby stratigraphic unit boundaries within the massive sulfide body. Estimates were generated for each element by ordinary linear kriging. Despite the relatively sparse data in a large massive deposit, the customized technique developed for Hellyer has provided a reliable model of spatial grade distribution by combining conventional geostatistical methods with careful geological observation and interpretation. Some geometry problems remain which are the subject of ongoing studies.

Key words

folded deposit variography three-dimensional kriging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Dagbert, M., David, M., Crozel, D., and Desbarats, A., 1984. Computing Variograms in Folded Strata-Controlled Deposits, in G. Verly et al. (Eds.): Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization, D. Reidel, Dordrecht., Part 1, p. 71–89.Google Scholar
  2. McArthur, G. J., 1986. The Hellyer Massive Sulphite Deposit, in R. R. Large (Ed.), The Mt. Read Volcanics and Associated Ore Deposits: Geo. Soc. Aust. Tas. Div. Hobart., p. 11–19.Google Scholar
  3. Rendu, J. M. and Readdy, L., 1982. Geology and the Semivariogram. A Critical Relationship. 17th APCOM Symposium, A.I.M.E., New York., p. 771–783.Google Scholar
  4. Sise, J. R. and Jack, D. J., 1984. Exploration Case History of the Hellyer Deposit, in P. W. Baillie and P. L. F. Collins (Eds.), Mineral Exploration and Tectonic Processes in Tasmania: Geol. Soc. Aust. Tas. Div. Hobart, p. 48–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. McArthur
    • 1
  1. 1.Aberfoyle Resources LimitedHellyer DivisionBurnieAustralia

Personalised recommendations