Skip to main content
Log in

Rationale and directions for an increased emphasis on the therapeutic relationship in family therapy

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues the need for an increased emphasis on the therapeutic relationship in family therapy. The ways in which the field of family therapy has eschewed the importance of the therapeutic relationship are discussed. Therapeutic alliance research from the field of individual psychotherapy and research on the importance of relationship factors to family therapy are reviewed. Suggestions for family therapy theory, practice, and research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, L., & Luborsky, L. (1986). Research on the helping alliance. In L.S. Greenberg, & W.M. Pinsof (Eds.),The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325–366). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A.E. (1971). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 3–22). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. (1987). Milan in Bucks County.The Family Therapy Networker, 11, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, B.L. (1992). Strategic therapy, eclecticism, and the therapeutic relationship.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, D. (1992) Reflections on strategic-systemic therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (1986). Behavior therapy with adults. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 3rd ed. (pp. 385–442). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, S.A., & Marmar, C.R. (1985). Therapist actions that address initially poor therapeutic alliances in psychotherapy.American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 922–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (1961).Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (1984). Therapeutic components of all psychotherapies. In J.M. Meyers (Ed.),Cures by psychotherapy: What effects change (pp. 15–27). New York: Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, S.L., & Bergin, A.E. (1986). Introduction and historical overview. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 3rd ed. (pp. 3–22). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, L. (1990). The concept of the alliance and its role in psychotherapy: Theoretical and empirical considerations.Psychotherapy, 27, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C., & Carter, J. (1985). The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy: Components, consequences and theoretical antecedents.The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 155–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.J., & Herget, M. (1991). Outcomes of systemic/strategic team consultation: III. The importance of therapist warmth and active structuring.Family Process, 30, 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L.S., & Pinsof, W.M. (1986). Process research: Current trends and future perspectives. In L.S. Greenberg & W.M. Pinsof (Eds.),The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, A.S., Kniskern, D.P., & Pinsof, W.M. (1986). Research on marital and family therapies. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 3rd ed. (pp. 565–624). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1980).Leaving home: The therapy of disturbed young people. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, W.P., Schacht, T., & Strupp, H.H. (1986). Structural analysis of social behavior: Application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.E., Helms, J.E., Tichenor, V., Spiegel, S.B., O'Grady, K.E., & Perry, E.S. (1988). Effects of therapist response modes in brief psychotherapy.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 222–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses.Family Process, 29, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A.O., & Greenberg, L.S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A.O., & Symonds, B.D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.C. (1986). Emerging concerns in family therapy.Social Work, 31, 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleckner, T., Frank, L., Bland, C., Amendt, J.H., & Bryant, R. (1992). The myth of the unfeeling strategic therapist.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M.J., Shapiro, D.A., & Bergin, A.E. (1986). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 3rd ed. (pp. 157–211). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, H.A., & Saba, G.W. (1982). Teaching family therapy at the introductory level: A conceptual model emphasizing a pattern which connects training and therapy.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanes, C. (1980). The prevention of rehospitalization of adolescents and young adults.Family Process, 19, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marziali, E., Marmar, C., & Krupnick, J. (1981). Therapeutic alliance scales: Development and relationship to psychotherapy outcome.American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 361–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashal, M., Feldman, R.B., & Sigal, J.J. (1989). The unraveling of a treatment paradigm: A followup study of the Milan approach to family therapy.Family Process, 28, 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W.T., & Searight, H.R. (1992). Why families are not like swamps, solar systems, or thermostats: Some limits of systems theory as applied to family therapy.Contemporary Family Therapy, 14, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, C.E. (1992). [Review ofThe consumers' view of family therapy]. Social Work, 37, 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, S., Suh, C.S., & Strupp, H.H. (1983). The Vanderbilt psychotherapy process scale: A report on the scale development and a process-outcome study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky, D.E., & Howard, K.I. (1986). Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 3rd ed. (pp. 311–381). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, H.H. (1979).Relationship: The heart of helping people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W.M. (1989). A conceptual framework and methodological criteria for family therapy process research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W.M., & Catherall, D.R. (1986). The integrative psychotherapy alliance: Family, couple and individual therapy scales.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J.D., McMain, S., Crocker, P., & Murray, P. (1990). Therapeutic alliance rupture as a therapy event for empirical investigation.Psychotherapy, 27, 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., &, Prata, G. (1978).Paradox and counterparadox. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile, D.B. (1981).Couples therapy: A nontraditional approach. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, K.M., & Geismar, L.L. (1989).Families at risk: Treating the multiproblem family. New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this article was presented at the 1992 Western Canadian Conference on Family Practice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coady, N.F. Rationale and directions for an increased emphasis on the therapeutic relationship in family therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 14, 467–479 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892195

Keywords

Navigation