Skip to main content
Log in

The paradoxical nature of the grief experience

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops the thesis that the grief experience attendant to loss by death is a natural phenomenon and that language has been used to obscure its nature as a process. The paradoxical nature of the grief experience refers to an expanded appreciation of its nature which can include a consideration of the survivor's own joy at being alive. A feeling of joy can occur consequent to allowing the more intense grief pain to be exposed and shared. Frequent references from playwrights and other well-known authors herein support the universal recognition of the above. The author has found these thoughtful individuals to constitute an important intellectual network for himself through the years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, E. (1973).The Denial of Death, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellow, S. (1977).To Jerusalem and Back: A Personal Account, New York: Avon. Book of Common Prayer, (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1961). Processes of mourning.Internationaljournal of Psychoanalysis, 42, 317–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980).Attachment and Loss, 3, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canetti, E. (1983).Comedy of Vanity and Life-terms, New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copleston, F. (1963). The revival of Platonism to Suarez.A History of Philosophy: Late medieval and Renaissance Philosophy, 3, New York: Image Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, H. (1937). Absence of grief.Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 6, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. (1963). In P. H. Knapp (Ed.),Expressions of the Emotions in Man, New York: International Universities Press, 267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, R. & Gottesman, D. (1980). Anticipatory grief: A psychosocial concept reconsidered.British Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W., Duhl, F. J., & Rizzo, N. D. (Eds.). (1969).General Systems Theory and Psychiatry, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorer, G. (1965).Death, Grief, and Mourning, Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammen, M. (1980).People of Paradox: An Inquiry Concerning the Origins of American Civilization, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellehear, A. (1984). Are we a death-denying society?Social Science Medicine, 18, 713–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. (1969).On Death and Dying, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, E. (1944). Symptomology and management of acute grief.American Journal of Psychiatry, 101, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, E. (1959).Nine Plays by Eugene O'Neil, New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouspensky, P. D. (1962).The Psychology of Man's Possible Evolution, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzoli-Selvini, M., Cecchin, G., Prata, G., & Boscolo, L. (1975).Paradox and Counterparadox: A New Model in the Therapy of the Family in Schizophrenic Transaction, New York and London: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N. L. (1967). The use of empathy in the resolution of grief.Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 11, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N. L. (1973). The need to mourn. In E. J. Anthony & C. Koupernik (Eds.).The Child in His Family: The Impact of Disease and Death, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, N. L. & Paul, B. B. (1975).A Marital Puzzle, New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, L. (1974).Death and the Family: The Importance of Mourning, New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, H. (1964). Writing for the theater.Evergreen Review (Winter).

  • Shands, H. C. (1971).The War with Words: Structure and Transcendence, Paris: Mouton Company, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard, D. E. (1975)Death in America, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, A. (1968).Man's Concern with Death, London: Hodder Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, G. & L'Abate, L. (1982).Paradoxical Psychotherapy: Theory and Practice with Individuals, Couples, and Families, New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel, E. (1985, April 14). Why I write: Making no become yes.The New York Times Book Review, 13.

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1949).The Aims of Education, New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Appreciation is expressed to Betty Byfield Paul, L.I.C.S.W., Counseling Associates, Lexington, Massachusetts, for consultation and editorial review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, N.L. The paradoxical nature of the grief experience. Contemp Fam Ther 8, 5–19 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891830

Keywords

Navigation