Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 35–48 | Cite as

Family therapy alone is not enough or the dirty story of Dorian

  • Katrit Ron
  • Rina Rosenberg
  • Tamara Melnick
  • Dani Pesses
Article

Abstract

When serious malfunctioning of an individual occurs in a secondary system (school, hospital, rehabilitation center, dormitory setting), the tendency often is to focus on the family as both the “cause” of the malfunctioning and the arena of intervention. Many times, family therapy alone is not enough because a parallel destructive constellation has formed around the Identified Patient in the secondary system as well and the symptoms catalyze that system's own maladaptive patterns. Often the IP is caught in the web of rigid pathological patterns of interactions between the two systems. A unique model of conjoined intersystemic intervention for dealing with such resistance to change is presented.

Keywords

Health Psychology Social Issue Unique Model Family Therapy Rehabilitation Center 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aponte, H. (1976). The family-school interview: An eco-structural approach.Family Process, 15, 303–311.Google Scholar
  2. Carl, D., & Jurkovic, G. J. (1983). Agency triangles: Problems in agency-family relationships.Family Process, 22, 441–452.Google Scholar
  3. Ehrlich, M. F. (1983). Psychofamilial correlates of school disorders.Journal of School Psychology, 21, 191–199.Google Scholar
  4. Fine, M. J., & Holt, P. (1983). Intervening with school problems: A family systems perspective.Psychology in the Schools, 20, 59–66.Google Scholar
  5. Green, K., & Fine, M. J. (1980). Family therapy: A case for training school psychologists.Psychology in the Schools, 17, 241–248.Google Scholar
  6. Haley, J. (1976).Problem-solving therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Keeney, B. P. (1979). Ecosystemic epistemology: An alternate paradign for diagnosis.Family Process, 18, 117–129.Google Scholar
  8. Minard, S. (1976). Family systems model in organizational consultation: Vignettes of consultation to a day-care center.Family Process, 15, 313–320.Google Scholar
  9. Minor, M. V. (1972). Systems analysis and school psychology.Journal of School Psychology, 10, 227–232.Google Scholar
  10. Minuchin, S. (1974).Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Selvini-Palazzoli, M. (1984). Behind the scenes of the relations.Journal of Family Therapy, 6, 299–307.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, A. H. (1978). Encountering the family system in school-related behavior problems.Psychology in the schools, 15, 379–386.Google Scholar
  13. Tucker, B. Z., & Dyson, E. (1976). The family and the school: Utilizing human resources to promote learning.Family Process, 15, 125–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrit Ron
    • 1
  • Rina Rosenberg
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tamara Melnick
    • 4
  • Dani Pesses
    • 4
  1. 1.Hebrew University and Psychological Municipal ServiceJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHebrew UniversityIsrael
  3. 3.Psychological Municipal ServiceJerusalem
  4. 4.Psychological Municipal ServiceJerusalem

Personalised recommendations