Skip to main content
Log in

Mobility and cooperation among nomadic shepherds: The case of theRaikas

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes and then analyzes the decision-making arrangements that prevail among the Raikas—nomadic shepherds from Western India. The paper suggests, using a simple analytical framework, that the existing distribution of decision-making during migration helps the Raikasto utilize available economies of scale, represent the different interest groups in their collectives, and control their decision-makers. At the same time, the ordinary shepherds in the camp are able to extract a comfortable subsistence from a complex and harsh environment by delegating much of their decision-making responsibilities to the leaders in the camp. To the extent shepherds in other parts of the world migrate over long distances and must confront similar issues of delegation of responsibilities and control over decision-makers, the analysis holds general relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, N., and Blaikie, P. (1990). Land Degradation, Slocking Rates and Conservation Policies in the Communal Rangelands of Botswana and Zimbabwe. Pastoral Development Network, Paper 29a, ODI, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (1992). Risks, Resources and Politics. Unpublished dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W., and Healy, R. (1990).Natural Resource Policy-Making in Developing Countries: Environment, Economic Growth and Income Distribution. Duke University Press, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1961).Nomads of South Persia. Oslo University Press, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., Raiffa, H., and Tversky, A. (eds.) (1990).Descriptive, Normative and Prescriptive Interactions. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., Warren, D., and Werner, O. (eds.) (1980).Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. University Press of America, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983).Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Saxena, N., and Shah, T. (1989).To the Hands of the Poor: Water and Trees. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, E., and Parkin, D. (Eds.) (1992).Bush Base, Forest Farm: Culture, Environment and Development. Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSE. (1985).The State of India's Environment, 1984–1985: The second citizen's report. CSE, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, W. F., and Prins, H. (1989). Decisions of cattle herdsmen in Burkina Faso and optimal foraging models.Human Ecology 17(4): 445–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaty, J. G., Aronson, D., and Salzman, P. (1981). The Future of Pastoral Peoples. Proceedings of a Conference held in Nairobi, Kenya, August 4–8, 1980.

  • Halstead, P., and O'Shea, J. (eds.) (1989).Bad year Economics: Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W., Berry, W., and Colman, B. (1984).Meeting the Expectations of the Land: Essays in Sustainable Agriculture and Stewardship. North Point Press, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. L. (1969).The Nature of Nomadism: A Comparative Study of Pastoral Migrations in Southwestern Asia and Northern Africa. University of Chicago, Department of Geography Research Paper, No. 118, Chicago.

  • Khazanov, A. M. (1984).Nomads and the Outside World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet D., and McCubbins, M. (1991).The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parlies and the Appropriations Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Rollefson, I. (1992). TheRaika camel pastoralists of western India.Research and Exploration 8(1): 117–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. (1948).Anthropology. Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1988).Decisions and Organizations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G. G., (1986).Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia: A Human Ecology Perspective. Westview Press, Boulder and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, T. (1990). Turkana pastoralism: A case against the tragedy of the commons.Human Ecology 18(1): 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, M. (1992). Success on the Commons: A comparative examination of institutions for common property resource management.Journal of Theoretical Politics 3(4): 247–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. (1989). Modeling hunter-gatherer decision-making: Complementing optimal foraging theory.Human Ecology 17(1): 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. (1974). Agrarian ecology. In Siegel, B. (ed.),Annual Review of Anthropology. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto.

  • Niamir, M. (1990).Herders' Decision Making in Natural Resource Management in Arid and Semi-Arid Africa. FAO Forestry Papers, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990).Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, M., and Alcorn, J. (eds.) (1991).Biodiversity: Culture, Conservation and Ecodevelopment. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1991).Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D., and Balee, W. (eds.) (1989).Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1985).Indigenous Agricultural Revolution. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, P. (1985).Persistent Pastoralists. Zed Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadr, K. (1991).The Development of Nomadism in Ancient Northeast Africa. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, S. (1983).Management of Pastoral Development in the Third World. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmink, M., and Wood, C. (Eds.). (1984).Frontier Expansion in Amazonia. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, V. (1990). In search of harmony between life and environment.Journal of Human Ecology (1)3: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. (1991). Using Local Indigenous Knowledge in Agricultural Development. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 127, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissleder, W. (ed.) (1978).The Nomadic Alternative. Mouton Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agrawal, A. Mobility and cooperation among nomadic shepherds: The case of theRaikas . Hum Ecol 21, 261–279 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891539

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891539

Key words

Navigation