Skip to main content
Log in

Labor productivity: A biophysical definition and assessment

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of energy analysis is presented to study the concept of labor productivity from a biophysical perspective. It is argued that current methods of defining and assessing labor productivity in the fields of work physiology and input/output energy analysis are relatively poor operational tools for assessing productivity in the economy and society. We propose to adopt society as the hierarchical level of analysis rather than the individual, as labor productivity can best be studied as a function of parameters related to the technological development of society. Parameters considered are: the ratio exosomatic/endosomatic energy used in society, the ratio working/non-working population, the return on the circulating energy investment, and the profile of human time allocated to the economic process. The links between patterns of human time allocation, population structure, standard of living, technological development, and demand on natural resources are analyzed. The results suggest that the role and meaning of human labor differ widely in societies with different levels of technological development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barac-Nieto, M., Spurr, G. B., Dahners, H. W., and Maksud, M. G. (1980). Aerobic work capacity and endurance during nutritional repletion of severely undernourished men.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33: 2268–2275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, J. C., Hamad, S. N., and Keller, J. (1975). Energy inputs to irrigation.Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Div. ASCE 101(IR4): 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, G. H. (1987). Energy in human nutrition: A reconsideration of the relationship between intake and functional consequences. In Gittinger, J. P., Leslie, J., and Hoisington, C. (eds.),Food Policy. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 346–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bério, A-J. (1984). The analysis of time allocation and activity patterns in nutrition and rural development planning.Food and Nutrition Bulletin 6(1): 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. M. (1965).Guns, Sails and Empires: Technological Innovation and the Early Phases of European Expansion, 1400–1700. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C. M. (1978).The Economic History of World Population. Harvester Press, Sussex/Barnes and Noble Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, F. (1955).Energy and Society. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, P., Goddard, G., Kain, P., Kriegler, R., and Molly, S. (1985).Labour Absence: A Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography. Working Paper Series, No. 81, National Institute of Labour Studies, Bedford Park, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debeir, J-C, Deléage, J-P, and Hémery, D. (1991).In the Servitude of Power: Energy and Civilization through the Ages. Zed Books Ltd, Atlantic Highlands, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, W. A., Lange, J. M. and de Wit, C. T. (1978). Energy production and use in Dutch agriculture.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durnin, J. V. G. A., and Passmore, R. (1967).Energy, Work and Leisure. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, W. C., and Edmundson, S. A. (1988). Food intake and work allocation of male and female farmers in an impoverished Indian village.British Journal of Nutrition 60: 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERAB (1981).Biomass Energy. Energy Research Advisory Board, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, R., Immink, M. D. C., Torún, B., Díaz, E., and Viteri, F. E. (1984). Functional consequences of marginal malnutrition among agricultural workers in Guatemala—Part I. Physical work capacity.Food and Nutrition Bulletin 6: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluck, R. C. (1981). Net energy sequestered in agricultural labor.Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24: 1449–1455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluck, R. C. (1992). Energy of human labor. In Fluck, R. C. (ed.),Energy in Farm Production (Vol. 6) Energy in World Agriculture. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., and Bukkens, S. G. F. (1992). Sustainable development: scientific and ethical assessments.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5(1): 27–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., and Pimentel, D. (1990). Assessment of the energetics of human labor.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 32: 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., and Pimentel, D. (1991). Energy efficiency: Assessing the interaction between humans and their environment.Ecological Economics 4: 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., and Pimentel, D. (1992). Energy efficiency and nutrition in societies based on human labor.Ecology of Food and Nutrition 28: 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., Cleveland, C. J., and Kaufmann, R. (1986).Energy and Resource Quality. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. P. (1982). Energy hazards: What to measure what to compare.Technology Review 85(3): 32–38, 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. C. (1975). Sugarcane: Its energy relationship with fossil fuel.Span 18: 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Office (ILO) (1990).1989–90 Yearbook of Labour Statistics. International Labour Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, W. H. (1978). Environmental perturbations and the origin of the Andean State. In Redman, C. L., Berman, M. J., Curtin, E. V., Langhorne Jr., W. T., Versaggi, N. M., and Wanser, J. C. (eds.),Social Archeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. Academic Press, New York, pp. 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. P. T., and Schofield, E. C. (1990).Human Energy Requirements. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kåberger, T. (1991). Measuring instrumental value in energy terms. In Folke, C. and Kåberger, T. (eds.),Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1956).Elements of Mathematical Biology. Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. G. (1979). Collection and analysis of data on rural women's time use.Studies in Family Planning 10(11/12): 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, E. (1984). The value and allocation of time in rural Botswana.Journal of Development Economics 15: 329–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, A., and Kask, C. (1991). Manufacturing productivity and labor costs in 14 economies.Monthly Labor Review (December): 24–37.

  • Norman, M. J. T. (1978). Energy inputs and outputs of subsistence cropping systems in the tropics.Agro-Ecosystems 4: 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1971).Environment, Power, and Society. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1992).Emergy and Public Policy. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and Pimentel, M. (1979).Food, Energy and Society. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Herdendorf, M., Eisenfeld, S., Olander, L., Carroquino, M., Corson, C., McDade, J., Chung, Y., Cannon, W., Roberts, B., Bluman, L., and Gregg, J. (1993). Achieving a secure energy future: environmental and economic issues.Ecological Economics (in press).

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1971). The flow of energy in an agricultural society.Scientific American 224: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, R. (1976). Energy use in rural India.Science 192: 969–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, G. B. (1988). Body size, physical work capacity, and productivity in hard work: Is bigger better? In Waterlow, J. C. (ed.),Linear Growth Retardation in Less Developed Countries.Nestlé Nutrition Workshop Series (Vol. 14). Nestec, Vevey/Raven Press, New York, pp. 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, G. B., Barac-Nieto, M., and Maksud, M. G. (1977). Productivity and maximal oxygen consumption in sugar cane cutters.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 30: 316–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1988).The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. E. (1979). Absent workers and lost work hours.Monthly Labor Review (August): 49–53.

  • United Nations (UN) (1990a).1988Energy Statistics yearbook. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) (1990b).Demographic yearbook 1988. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of the Census (USBC) (1991).Statistical Abstract of the United States 1991. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1943). Energy and the evolution of culture.American Anthropologist 14: 335–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A. (1959).The Evolution of Culture. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. W., McCarty, T. R., Gunkel, W. W., Price, D. R., and Jewell, W. J. (1975). Energy utilization on beef feed lots and dairy farms. In Jewell, W. J. (ed.),Energy, Agriculture and Waste Management.Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1985).Desertification in Sahelian and Sudanian Zones in West Africa. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giampietro, M., Bukkens, S.G.F. & Pimentel, D. Labor productivity: A biophysical definition and assessment. Hum Ecol 21, 229–260 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891538

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891538

Key words

Navigation