Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying and testing differences among means of compositional data suites

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commonly, geological studies compare mean values of two or more compositional data suites in order to determine if, how, and by how much they differ. Simple approaches for evaluating and statistically testing differences in mean values for open data fail for compositional (closed) data. A new parameter, an “f-value,” therefore has been developed, which correctly quantifies the differences among compositional mean values and allows testing those differences for statistical significance. In general, this parameter quantifies only therelative factor by which compositional variables differ across data suites; however for situations where, arguably, at least one component has neither increased nor decreased, anabsolute f-value can be computed. In situations where the compositional variables have undergone many perturbations, arguments based upon thef-values and the central limit theorem indicate that logratios of compositional variables should be normally distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J., 1982, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: J. Royal Statistical Soc. B, v. 44, p. 139–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1986a, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: London, England, Chapman & Hall, 416 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. 1986b, CODA a Microcomputer Package for the Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: London, Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1989, Measures of Location of Compositional Data Sets: Math. Geol., v. 21, p. 787–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C., 1957, The Lognormal Distribution with Special Reference to its Use in Economics: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 176 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, U., 1989, Aragonite-Calcite Transformation Based on Pennsylvanian Molluscs: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bulletin, v. 101, p. 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, K. M., and Woronow, A., 1989, Preneomorphic Diagenesis of Corals from a Subaerially Exposed Holocene Reef, Enriquillo Valley, Dominican Republic. Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstracts with Pgm., p. 326.

  • Love, K. M., and Woronow, A., 1990, Chemical Changes Induced in Aragonite Using Treatments for the Destruction of Organic Material: Chem. Geol. (submitted).

  • Kolmogoroff, Van A. N., 1941, Über das logarithmisch normale verteilungsgesetz der dimensionen de tielchen bei zertstüchkelung. Comptes Rendus (Doklady), v. 31, p. 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., 1968, Redistribution of Major Elements in the Alteration of Some Basic Lavas During Burial Metamorphism: J. Pet., v. 9, p. 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., and Smith, S. E., 1976, Comments on the Use of Ti, Zr, Y, Sr, K, P and Nb in Classification of Basaltic Magmas: Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 32, p. 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woronow, A., and Love, K. M., 1990, Aragonite-Calcite Transformation Based on Pennsylvanian Molluscs (Discussion): Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. v. 101, p. 841–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woronow, A., 1990, Quantifying and Statistically Testing Differences Between Compositional Data Suites: Comp. & Geosci. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woronow, A., Love, K.M. Quantifying and testing differences among means of compositional data suites. Math Geol 22, 837–852 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890666

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890666

Key words

Navigation