Abstract
Commonly, geological studies compare mean values of two or more compositional data suites in order to determine if, how, and by how much they differ. Simple approaches for evaluating and statistically testing differences in mean values for open data fail for compositional (closed) data. A new parameter, an “f-value,” therefore has been developed, which correctly quantifies the differences among compositional mean values and allows testing those differences for statistical significance. In general, this parameter quantifies only therelative factor by which compositional variables differ across data suites; however for situations where, arguably, at least one component has neither increased nor decreased, anabsolute f-value can be computed. In situations where the compositional variables have undergone many perturbations, arguments based upon thef-values and the central limit theorem indicate that logratios of compositional variables should be normally distributed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison, J., 1982, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: J. Royal Statistical Soc. B, v. 44, p. 139–177.
Aitchison, J., 1986a, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: London, England, Chapman & Hall, 416 p.
Aitchison, J. 1986b, CODA a Microcomputer Package for the Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: London, Chapman & Hall.
Aitchison, J., 1989, Measures of Location of Compositional Data Sets: Math. Geol., v. 21, p. 787–790.
Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C., 1957, The Lognormal Distribution with Special Reference to its Use in Economics: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 176 p.
Brand, U., 1989, Aragonite-Calcite Transformation Based on Pennsylvanian Molluscs: Geol. Soc. Amer. Bulletin, v. 101, p. 377–390.
Love, K. M., and Woronow, A., 1989, Preneomorphic Diagenesis of Corals from a Subaerially Exposed Holocene Reef, Enriquillo Valley, Dominican Republic. Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstracts with Pgm., p. 326.
Love, K. M., and Woronow, A., 1990, Chemical Changes Induced in Aragonite Using Treatments for the Destruction of Organic Material: Chem. Geol. (submitted).
Kolmogoroff, Van A. N., 1941, Über das logarithmisch normale verteilungsgesetz der dimensionen de tielchen bei zertstüchkelung. Comptes Rendus (Doklady), v. 31, p. 99–101.
Smith, R. E., 1968, Redistribution of Major Elements in the Alteration of Some Basic Lavas During Burial Metamorphism: J. Pet., v. 9, p. 191–219.
Smith, R. E., and Smith, S. E., 1976, Comments on the Use of Ti, Zr, Y, Sr, K, P and Nb in Classification of Basaltic Magmas: Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 32, p. 114–120.
Woronow, A., and Love, K. M., 1990, Aragonite-Calcite Transformation Based on Pennsylvanian Molluscs (Discussion): Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. v. 101, p. 841–844.
Woronow, A., 1990, Quantifying and Statistically Testing Differences Between Compositional Data Suites: Comp. & Geosci. (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woronow, A., Love, K.M. Quantifying and testing differences among means of compositional data suites. Math Geol 22, 837–852 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890666
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890666