Skip to main content
Log in

Inpatient versus outpatient treatment of substance abuse: Recent developments in the controversy

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been considerable controversy the past decade on which is more effective, inpatient or outpatient treatment of substance abuse. During this same decade substance abuse treatment grew into a $40 billion industry with for-profit hospital programs accounting for as much as one-half the total figure. Recently, controlled studies have replaced the previous research literature which was largely composed of uncontrolled studies. A research consensus is developing that states inpatient rehabilitation has no advantages over outpatient treatment and that even hospitalization for detoxification is unnecessary for 90% of patients. Implications for public policy are that we are over-spending in the treatment of substance abuse by misallocating resources to the most intrusive intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annis, H. (1987, October).Effective treatment for drug and alcohol problems: do we know? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, K., & Miller, W. R. (1986). Minimal intervention in the treatment of problem drinkers: A controlled study. Unpublished manuscript as quoted in Miller, W. R. and Hester, R. K. Inpatient alcoholism treatment.American Psychologist, 41, 794–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, P., & Huygens, I. (1988). An evaluation of three treatment programs for alcoholism: An experimental study with 6 and 18 month follow-ups.British Journal of Addiction, 83, 67–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, N. A. (1979). Turning bread into stones: Our modern antimiracle.American Psychologist, 34, 1119–1129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, N.A. (1986). The dismantling of our health system: Strategies for the survival of psychological practice.American Psychologist, 41, 426–431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duhl, L.J., & Cummings, N.A. (1987). The emergence of the mental health complex. In L. J. Duhl & N. A. Cummings (Eds.),The future of mental health services: Coping with crisis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G., Orford, J., Egert, S., Guthrie, S., Hawker, A., Hensman, C., Mitcheson, M., Oppenheimer, E. & Taylor, C. (1977). Alcoholism: A controlled trial of “treatment” and “advice.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 38, 1004–1031.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. J., Pattison, E. M., Sobell, L. C., Graham, T., & Sobell, M. B. (1975). Out-patient alcohol detoxification: Initial findings on 564 patients.American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 407–412.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, D. M., Bishop, M. P., Mouledoux, A., Faulkner, M. A., Brisolara, A., & Swanson, W. A. (1973). The revolving-door alcoholic: An impasse in the treatment of the chronic alcoholic.Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 633–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashida, M., Alterman, A.I., McLellan, A.T., Obrien, C.P., Purtill, J.J., Volpicelli, J.E., Raphaelson, A.H., & Hall, C.P. (1989). Comparative effectiveness and costs of inpatient detoxification of patients with mild-to-moderate alcohol withdrawal syndrome.New England Journal of Medicine, February 9, 358–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holser, M. A. (1979). A socialization program for chronic alcoholics.International Journal of the Addictions, 14, 657–674.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, C. A. (1982). Mental hospitals and alternative care: Noninstitutionalization as potential public policy for mental patients.American Psychologist, 37, 349–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kissin, B., Platz, A., & Su, W. H. (1970). Social and psychological factors in the treatment of chronic alcoholism.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 8, 13–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrady, B., Longabaugh, R., Fink, E., Stout, R., Beattie, M., & Ruggieri-Authelet, A. (1986). Cost effectiveness of alcoholism treatment in partial hospital versus inpatient settings after brief inpatient treatment: 12 month outcomes.Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 54, 708–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrady, B., Noel, N., Abrams, D., Stout, R., Nelson, H., & Hay, W. (1986). Comparative effectiveness of three types of spouse involvement in outpatient behavioral alcoholism treatment.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 459–467.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLachian, J.F.C., & Stein, R.L. (1982). Evaluation of a day clinic for alcoholics.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 43, 261–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G.E., O'Brien, C.P., & Druley, K.A. (1983). Predicting response to alcohol and drug abuse treatments: Role of psychiatric severity.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 620–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R. (1985). Motivation for treatment: A review with special emphasis on alcoholism.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 84–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Baca, L. M. (1983). Two-year follow-up of bibliotherapy and therapist-directed controlled drinking training for problem drinkers.Behavior Therapy, 14, 441–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., Gribskov, C. J., & Mortell, R. L. (1981). Effectiveness of a self-control manual for problem drinkers with and without therapist contact.International Journal of the Addictions, 16, 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R. & Hester, R.K. (1986). Inpatient alcoholism treatment.American Psychologist, 41, 794–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Hester, R. K. (1987a). Matching problem drinkers with optimal treatments. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.),Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change, New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Hester, R. K. (1987b). The effectiveness of alcoholism treatment methods: What research reveals. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.),Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, V., Davis, J., Mulligan, D., & Iber, F. L. (1975). Comparison of outcome in a 9-day and 30-day alcoholism treatment program.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 1277–1281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Briant, R., Petersen, N.W., & Heacock, D. (1977). How safe is social setting detoxification?Alcohol Health and Research World, 1(2), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J., Oppenheimer, E., & Edwards, G. (1976). Abstinence or control: The outcome for excessive drinkers two years after consultation.Behavior Research and Therapy, 14, 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. D., & Schaub, L. H. (1979). Efficacy of threeversus five-week alcohol treatment program.International Journal of the Addictions, 14, 697–714.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peele, S. (1978). Addiction: The analgesic experience.Human Nature, September.

  • Pittman, D. J., & Tate, R. L. (1972). A comparison of two treatment programs for alcoholics.International Journal of the Addictions, 18, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B. J., Penick, E. C., Read, M.R., & Ludwig, A. M. (1985). Comparison of three outpatient treatment interventions: A twelve-month follow-up of men alcoholics.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46, 309–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, R. A. H., Paulus, I., & Clarke, G. G. (1965). An evaluation of the effect of a clinic treatment program on the rehabilitation of alcoholic patients.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 26, 264–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., Esty, K., & Fine, M. (1983).The effectiveness and costs of alcoholism treatment. (Health Technology Case Study 22). Washington, D.C. Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, L., & Goodman, L. (1988).The Effectiveness of Outpatient vs. Inpatient Treatment: Updating the OTA Report (Health Technology Case Study 22 Update). Washington, D.C., Office of Technology Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, J.J., Wieman, R.J., & Bechtel, J.E. (1981). Follow-up of a twelve-month treatment program for chronic alcoholics.International Journal of the Addictions, 16, 233–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, R.G. (1978). So some alcoholics do better in some types of treatment than others?Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 3, 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, R. G., & Gray, G. (1978). Minimal, moderate and long-term treatment for alcoholism.British Journal of Addiction, 73, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, D. J., Smith, W. G., Amidjaya, I., & Kaplan, J. M. (1979). Sytems of care and treatment outcomes for alcoholic patients.Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 535–539.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. D., Donovan, D. M., Kivlahan, D. R., & O'Leary, M. R. (1983). Length of stay, neuropsychological performance, and aftercare influences on alcohol treatment outcome.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 900–911.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, P. J. A., Letemendia, F. J. J., & Arroyave, F. (1973). A two-year follow-up study comparing short with long stay in-patient treatment of alcoholics.British Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nicholas A. Cummings, PhD, is founder and chairman of the board of directors of American Biodyne and president of the Biodyne Institute, president of the National Academies of Practice, former president of the American Psychological Association, and founder of the four campuses of the California School of Professional Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummings, N.A. Inpatient versus outpatient treatment of substance abuse: Recent developments in the controversy. Contemp Fam Ther 13, 507–520 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890501

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890501

Keywords

Navigation