Skip to main content
Log in

The geometric signature: Quantifying landslide-terrain types from digital elevation models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topography of various types and scales can be fingerprinted by computer analysis of altitude matrices (digital elevation models, or DEMs). The critical analytic tool is the geometric signature, a set of measures that describes topographic form well enough to distinguish among geomorphically disparate landscapes. Different surficial processes create topography with diagnostic forms that are recognizable in the field. The geometric signature abstracts those forms from contour maps or their DEMs and expresses them numerically. This multivariate characterization enables once-in-tractable problems to be addressed. The measures that constitute a geometric signature express different but complementary attributes of topographic form. Most parameters used here are statistical estimates of central tendency and dispersion for five major categories of terrain geometry; altitude, altitude variance spectrum, slope between slope reversals, and slope and its curvature at fixed slope lengths. As an experimental application of geometric signatures, two mapped terrain types associated with different processes of shallow landsliding in Marin County, California, were distinguished consistently by a 17-variable description of topography from 21×21 DEMs (30-m grid spacing). The small matrix is a statistical window that can be used to scan large DEMs by computer, thus potentially automating the mapping of contrasting terrain types. The two types in Marin County host either (1) slow slides: earth flows and slump-earth flows, or (2) rapid flows: debris avalanches and debris flows. The signature approach should adapt to terrain taxonomy and mapping in other areas, where conditions differ from those in Central California.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrough, P. A., 1981, Fractal Dimensions of Landscapes and Other Environmental Data: Nature, v. 294, p. 240–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P. A., 1986, Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resource Assessment: Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 193 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, S. H., and Ellen, S., 1985, Rainfall Conditions for Abundant Debris Avalanches in the San Francisco Bay Region, California: Calif. Geol., v. 38, no. 12, p. 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara, A., 1984, Landslide Hazard Mapping: Aims and Methods: Papers of Colloquium on Ground Movements, Caen (France), March 22–23, 1984, Série Documents du BRGM, No. 83, p. 141–151.

  • Elandt, R. C., 1961, The Folded Normal Distribution: Two methods of Estimating Parameters from Moments: Technometrics, v. 3, p. 551–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, S.; Peterson, D. M.; Reid, G. O.; and Savina, M. E., 1979, Hillslope Forms and Landslide Processes in Erosional Terrain on Franciscan Rocks of the Marin Peninsula, California [abs.]: Geol. Soc. Amer. Abst. Prog., v. 11, no. 3, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, S.; Peterson, D. M.; and Reid, G. O. 1982, Map Showing Areas Susceptible to Different Hazards from Shallow Landsliding, Marin County and Adjacent Parts of Sonoma County, California: U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Field Studies Map MF-1406, 1:62,500 scale.

  • Enzmann, R. D., 1966, Introduction to the Section on Signatures,in Planetology and Space Mission Planning: Ann. New York Acad. Sci., v. 140, Article 2, 154–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I. S., 1972, General Geomorphometry, Derivatives of Altitude, and Descriptive Statistics,in R. J. Chorley (Ed.), Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology, London, Methuen, p. 17–90.

  • Evans, I. S., 1980, An Integrated System of Terrain Analysis and Slope Mapping: Z. Geomorphol., N. F., Suppl.-Bd. 36, p. 274–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyton, J. R., 1985, A Digital Terrain Modelling Package: Earth and Min. Sci. (Penn. State Univ.), v. 54, no. 4, p. 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faintich, M. B., 1985, Defense Mapping Undergoes a Digital Revolution: Comput. Graph. World, June, p. 10–28.

  • Jahns, R. H., 1953, Surficial Geology of the Ayer Quadrangle, Mass.: U.S. Geological Survey map, Scale 1:31, 680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, D. K. and Johnson, A. M., 1983, Earth Flows: Morphology, Mobilization, and Movement: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1264, 56 p.

  • Laut, P. and Paine, T. A., 1982, A Step Towards an Objective Procedure for Land Classification and Mapping: Appl. Geog., v. 2, p. 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D. M., 1975, Geomorphometric Parameters: A Review and Evaluation: Geog. Ann., v. 3–4, Ser. A, p. 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. R. (Ed.), 1987, Clastic Particles—Scanning Electron Microscopy and Shape Analysis of Sedimentary and Volcanic Clasts: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 346 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. F. and Simpson, C. J., 1982, Computer Manipulation of a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) of Australia: Bur. Min. Resour. J. Australian Geol. Geophys., v. 7, p. 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. M., 1979, Hillslope Erosional Processes Related to Bedrock, Soils, and Topography of the Three Peaks Area, Marin County, California: San Jose State University, San Jose, California, M. S. thesis, 94 p.

  • Peucker, T. K.; Fowler, R. J.; Little, J. J.; and Mark, D. M., 1978, The Triangulated Irregular Network: Proceedings of the Digital Terrain Models (DTM) Symposium; American Society of Photogrammetry, p. 516–540.

  • Pike, R. J., 1986, Geometric Signatures of Intermediate-Scale Topography [abs.]: Geol. Soc. Amer. Abst. Prog., v. 18, no. 2, p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R. J., 1987, Information Content of Planetary Terrain: Varied Effectiveness of Parameters for the Earth [abs.]: Lunar Planet. Sci., XVIIII, p. 778–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R. J., and Rozema, W. J., 1975, Spectral Analysis of Landforms: Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geog., v. 65, p. 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, G. O., 1978, The Relationship Among Slope Processes, Soils, Bedrock, and Topography in an Area of Franciscan Terrain in Marin County, California: San Jose State University, San Jose, California, M. S. thesis, 90 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaber, G. G.; Pike, R. J.; and Berlin, G. L., 1980, Terrain-Analysis Procedures for Modeling Radar Backscatter: Radar Geology: An Assessment, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication 80-61, Pasadena, California, p. 168–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight, J. G., 1977, Landform Pattern Description from Aerial Photographs: Photogrammetria, v. 32, p. 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1969, Classes of Land-Surface Form: Sheet 62, National Atlas of the United States, Scale 1:7,500,000.

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1979, The Quiet Revolution in Mapping: U.S. Geological Survey Yearbook, Fiscal Year 1979, p. 24–30.

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1982, Goals and Tasks of the Landslide Part of a Ground-Failure Hazards Reduction Program: U.S. Geological Circular 880, 49 p.

  • Wolfanger, L. A., 1941, Landform Types, A Method of Quantitative and Graphic Analysis and Classification: Michigan State College Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 175, 24 p.

  • Wood, W. F. and Snell, J. B., 1960, A Quantitative System for Classifying Landforms: Technical Report EP-124, U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Command, Natick, Massachusetts, 20 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. F.; Soderberg, P. G.; and Pike, R. J., 1962, A Preliminary Model of Most-Severe Contour Flying: Aircraft-Environmental Research Study Report AE-4, U.S. Army Quartermaster Research and Engineering Command, Natick, Massachusetts, 33 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pike, R.J. The geometric signature: Quantifying landslide-terrain types from digital elevation models. Math Geol 20, 491–511 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890333

Key words

Navigation