Skip to main content
Log in

Authoring for simulation-based learning

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the SAM (Simulation and Multimedia) project and the rationales behind it. SAM focuses mainly on integrated simulation-based learning environments and creates a framework for authoring, modelling and learning. In these frameworks existing software tools are used where possible and an exchange of tools is enabled. Specialised tools support all actors: learners, authors and modellers. Emphasis will be put on methodologies and graphical tools supporting global course design and integration of simulations. Tools enable also the implementation of general and local course control including instructions for the monitor to recognise and evaluate learner behaviour.

SAM methods and techniques are developed to design adaptable courses to meet different learner profiles and to integrate simulations in courseware. This implies a technical integration: the simulation package must accept external control and support an exchange of data. It also implies a conceptual integration: instructional domain concepts must be connected with the model entities; variables, parameters and relations.

Instructional objects created with existing authoring tools are incorporated into SAM by specifying a script. The resulting Instructional Scripted Objects (ISOs) enable a smooth transition between different applications and constitute control mechanisms on a local level. These ISOs serve as building blocks within the SAM environment. By connecting these ISOs with a curriculum graph new courses and learning strategies are implemented. Simulation ISOs are offered allowing different levels of freedom: from fully system guided tasks to learner controlled experiments. The monitoring of learner actions and simulation states is possible. Creating and tuning simulations to support instruction will be a collaborative act for author and modeller.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAT (1991). Final Report on Advanced Authoring Tools. Delta Project 1010.

  • Berkum, van J.J.A., Byard, M.J. & Tait K. (1991). Formalisation of instructional support in intelligent simulation learning environments, in T. de Jong & K. Tait, eds.,Towards Formalising the Components of an Intelligent Simulation Learning Environment. Delta Project 1014.

  • Cooke, N.M. & McDonald, J.E. (1988). The application of psychological scaling techniques to knowledge dictation for knowledge-based systems, in J.H. Boose & B.R. Gaines, eds.,Knowledge Acquisition Tools for Expert Systems. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N.M. & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1986).The evolution of cognitive networks with computer programming experience. Paper presented at the Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, 5–6 June 1986, Washington D.C.

  • Diessel, T., Lehmann, A. & Vassileva, J. (1993). Individualised Course Generation Using a ‘Slightly Intelligent’ CAL System. In the proceedings of PEG-93, Edinburgh.

  • Engelen, G., Uljee, I., Wargnies, S. & White, R. (1992). Exploratory modelling of socioeconomic impacts of climate change, in G.A. Maul, ed.,Climate Change in the Infra-American Sea.

  • Fisher, K.M. (1992). SemNet: a tool for personal knowledge construction, in P.A.M. Kommers, D.H. Jonassen & J.T. Mayes, eds.,Cognitive Tools for Learning. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Njoo, M., Hijne, H. & Berkum van, J.J.A. (1991). Learning processes, learner attributes and simulations.Education & Computing 6: 263–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J.D., Hutchins, E.L. & Weitzman, L.M. (1987). Steamer an interactive, inspectable, simulation-based training system, in G. Kearsley, ed.,Artificial Intelligence and Instruction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, T. de & Sarti, L. (1994). Introduction: trends in the design and production of computer based learning material, in T. de Jong & L. Sarti, eds.,Design and Production of Multimedia and Simulation-based Learning Material. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, T. de, Joolingen, W. van, Scott, D., Hoog, R. de, Lapied, L. & Valent, R. (1994). SMISLE: system for multimedia integrated simulation learning, in T. de Jong & L. Sarti, eds.,Design and Production of Multimedia and Simulation-based Learning Material. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joolingen, van W.R. & Jong, T. de (1991). An Hypothesis Scratchpad as a Supportive Instrument in Simulation Learning Environments. Section 4 of SAFE report SIM/23 under DELTA Contract D1014.

  • Koehorst, A. (1992).Gericht leren in een exploratieve omgeving, een case study voor SOLA. (Directed Learning in an explorative environment, a case study for SOLA). RIKS internal report 92-12-76 (in Dutch).

  • Koehorst, A., Baaren, van der J. & Rosmalen, van P. (1991). Authoring planning for educational systems, in Proceedings of the Sixth International PEG Conference. Genova: Institute per la Matematica Applicata, CNR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kommers, P.A.M. & Vries, de S.A. (1992). TextVision and the visualisation of knowledge: school-based evaluation of its acceptance at two levels of schooling, in P.A.M. Kommers, D.H. Jonassen & J.T. Mayes, eds.,Cognitive Tools for Learning. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B. (1992). Constructing knowledge with learning tool, in P.A.M. Kommers, D.H. Jonassen & J.T. Mayes, eds.,Cognitive Tools for Learning. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D.M. (1987). Computers and the emancipation of students: giving control to the learner.Instructional Science 16: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mispelkamp, H. & Sarti, L. (1994). DISCOURSE: tools for the design of learning material, in T. de Jong & L. Sarti, eds.,Design and Production of Multimedia and Simulation-based Learning Material. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T.P. (1981). The Command Language Grammar: a representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems.Internationaljournal of Man-Machine Studies 15: 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, M.A. (1979). Concept maps as tools for teaching.Journal of College Science Teaching 8: 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelamkavil, F. (1987).Computer Simulation and Modelling. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L. (1992). An ethnographic approach to analysing navigation and task structure in interactive multimedia: some design issues for group use, in A. Monk, D. Diaper & M.D. Harrison, eds.,People and Computers VII. Cambridge, Great Britain: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravn, F. (1991). ITSIE Monitor Taxonomy, CRI/JTSIE/016. ESPRIT Project 2615.

  • Reigeluth, C.M. & Schwanz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann Hershey, R. & Craig Whitehead, D. (1991). The Federated GIS — A Macintosh Approach.Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Geographical Information Systems, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Rivlin, E., Botagogo, R. & Shneiderman, B. (1994). Navigating in hyperspace: designing a structure-based toolbox.Communications of the ACM 37(2): 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosmalen, van P. (1994). SAM, Simulation and Multimedia, in T. de Jong & L. Sarti, eds.,Design and Production of Multimedia and Simulation-Based Training. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1987). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloway, E. (1994). Ways of seeing.Communications of the ACM 37(2): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, K., ed. (1989). SIM/10 First Intermediate Report on authoring tools for simulations, DELTA project D1014 SAFE.

  • Tait, K. (1994). DISCOURSE: The design and production of multimedia and simulation-based learning environments, in T. de Jong & L. Sarti, eds.,Design and Production of Multimedia and Simulation-based Learning Material. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.W. (1987). Mathematical microworlds and intelligent computer-assisted instruction, in G. Kearsley, ed.,Artificial Intelligence and Instruction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsgrove, R., ed. (1991a). ‘Instructional planning’, in Final specifications for the MATIC system, MATIC-deliverable 3.8.3. DELTA Project 1009.

  • Wallsgrove, R., ed. (1991b). ‘Interpretation of complex learner action patterns’, in Final specifications for the MATIC system, MATIC-deliverable 3.8.3. DELTA Project 1009.

  • Wenger, E. (1987).Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B. & Cunningham, P.A. (1987). Multiple knowledge sources in intelligent teaching systems.IEEE Expert Vol. 41–54.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensgens, J., Van Rosmalen, P. & Van Der Baaren, J. Authoring for simulation-based learning. Instr Sci 23, 269–296 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890273

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890273

Keywords

Navigation