Mathematical Geology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 205–225 | Cite as

Statistical properties of sediment bed profiles in alluvial channels

  • André Robert
Articles

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate in detail the statistical properties of series of bed elevations measured on gravel-bed and sand-bed alluvial channels, in order to identify means of quantifying bed roughness effects on streamflow. The semivariogram is used as the basic statistical method for investigating roughness properties of bed profiles obtained from field work and laboratory experiments. For sand bedforms, the semivariograms include exponential and periodic components from which can be obtained reliable measures of bedform spacing and height, as well as information on the degree of regularity of bedform arrangement. Because of the irregular nature of gravel-bed profiles, the approach in this case uses the semivariogram to investigate fractal properties of series of bed elevations to determine scales of bed roughness associated with grain sizes and small-scale bedforms and to estimate the Hausdorff dimension corresponding to each scale. These superimposed scales of roughness may be responsible for the greater flow resistance generally observed in gravel-bed rivers rather than predicted from the theoretical friction equation.

Key words

semivariogram fractals river bedforms flow resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. R. L., 1983, River Bedforms: Progress and Problems:in Collinson, J. D. and Lewin, J. (Eds.), Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems, Special Publication 6 of the International Association of Sedimentologists: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p. 19–33.Google Scholar
  2. ASCE, 1963, Friction Factors in Open Channels: Jour. Hydraul. Div. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., v. 89, p. 97–143.Google Scholar
  3. Bathurst, J. C., 1982, Theoretical Aspects of Flow Resistance:in Hey, R. D.; Bathurst, J. C.; and Thorne, C. R. (Eds.), Gravel-Bed Rivers: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, p. 83–105.Google Scholar
  4. Bluck, B. J., 1987, Bed Forms and Clast Size Changes in Gravel Bed Rivers:in Richards, K. S. (Ed.), River Channels: Environment and Process: Institute of British Geographers Special Publication, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, p. 159–178.Google Scholar
  5. Boothroyd, J. C. and Ashley, G., 1975, Processes, Bar Morphology, and Sedmentary Structures on Braided Outwash Fans, North-Eastern Gulf of Alaska;in Jopling, A. V. and McDonald, B. C. (Eds.), Glaciofluvial and Glaciolacustrine Sedimentation: Soc. Econ. Paleon. Min., Special Publication 23, p. 193–222.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, D. I., 1982, Flow Resistance in Gravel-Bed Rivers:in Hey, R. D.; Bathurst, J. C.; and Thornes, C. R. (Eds.), Gravel-Bed Rivers: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, p. 109–133.Google Scholar
  7. Brayshaw, A. C., 1984, The Characteristics and Origin of Cluster Bedforms in Coarse-Grained Alluvial Channels;in Koster, E. H. and Stell, R. H. (Eds.), The Sedimentology of Gravel and Conglomerates: Canad. Soc. Pet. Geol. Mem., v. 10, p. 77–85.Google Scholar
  8. Brayshaw, A. C., 1985, Bed Microtopography and Entrainment Thresholds in Gravel-Bed Rivers: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., v. 96, p. 218–223.Google Scholar
  9. Brayshaw, A. C.; Frostick, L. E.; and Reid, I., 1983, The Hydrodynamics of Particle Clusters and Sediment Entrainment in Coarse Alluvial Channels: Sedimentology, v. 30, p. 137–143.Google Scholar
  10. Burrough, P. A., 1983a, Multiscale Sources of Spatial Variation in Soil. I. The Application of Fractal Concepts to Nested Levels of Soil Variation: Jour. Soil Sci., v. 34, p. 577–597.Google Scholar
  11. Burrough, P. A., 1983b, Multiscale Sources of Spatial Variation in Soil. II. A non-Brownian Fractal Model and its Application in Soil Survey: Jour. Soil Sci., v. 34, p. 599–620.Google Scholar
  12. Burrough, P. A., 1984, The Application of Fractal Ideas to Geophysical Phenomena: The Jour. Math. Appl., v. 20, p. 36–42.Google Scholar
  13. Crickmore, M. J., 1970, Effect of Flume Width on Bed-Form Characteristics: Jour. Hydraul. Div. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., v. 96, p. 473–496.Google Scholar
  14. Culling, W. E. H., 1986a, Highly Erratic Spatial Variability of soil-pH on Iping Common, West Sussex: Catena, v. 13, p. 81–98.Google Scholar
  15. Culling, W. E. H., 1986b, On Hurst Phenomena in the Landscape: Trans., Jap. Geomorph. Union, v. 7, p. 221–243.Google Scholar
  16. Culling, W. E. H. and Datko, M., 1987, The Fractal Geometry of the Soil-Covered Landscape: Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms, v. 12, p. 369–385.Google Scholar
  17. Einstein, H. A. and Banks, R. B., 1950, Fluid Resistance of Composite Roughness: Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, v. 31, p. 603–610.Google Scholar
  18. Einstein, H. A. and Barbarossa, N. L., 1952, River Channel Roughness: Transact. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., v. 117, p. 1121–1146.Google Scholar
  19. Engelund, F. and Fredsoe, J., 1982, Sediment Ripples and Dunes: Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., v. 14, p. 13–37.Google Scholar
  20. Fredsoe, J., 1974, On the Development of Dunes in Erodible Channels: Jour. Fluid Mech., v. 64, p. 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. Hey, R. D., 1979, Flow Resistance in Gravel-Bed Rivers: Jour. Hydraul. Div. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., v. 105, p. 365–379.Google Scholar
  22. Hipel, K. W. and McLeod, A. I., 1978, Preservation of the Rescaled Adjusted Range. 3. Fractional Gaussian Noise Algorithms: Water Resour. Res., v. 14, p. 517–518.Google Scholar
  23. Jain, S. C. and Kennedy, J. F., 1974, The Spectral Evolution of Sedimentary Bedforms: Jour. Fluid Mech., v. 63, p. 301–314.Google Scholar
  24. Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, C., 1978, Mining Geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p.Google Scholar
  25. Kennedy, J. F., 1969, The Formation of Sediment Ripples, Dunes, and Antidunes: Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., v. 1, p. 147–168.Google Scholar
  26. Koster, E. H., 1978, Transverse Ribs: Their Characteristics, Origin, and Paleohydraulic Significance,in Miall, A. D. (Ed.), Fluvial Sedimentology: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 5, p. 161–186.Google Scholar
  27. Laronne, J. B. and Carson, M. A., 1976, Interrelationships Between Bed Morphology and Bed Material Transport for a Small Gravel Bed Channel: Sedimentology, v. 23, p. 67–85.Google Scholar
  28. Leopold, L. B.; Wolman, M. G.; and Miller, J. P., 1964, Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology: Freeman, San Francisco, 522 p.Google Scholar
  29. Limerinos, J. T., 1970, Determination of the Manning Coefficient from Measured Bed Roughness in Natural Channels: U.S. Geol. Sur. Water-Supply Paper, 1898-B.Google Scholar
  30. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1965, Une Classe de Processus Stochastiques Homothétiques à Soi: Application à la loi Climatique de H. E. Hurst: Comptes Rendus (Paris), v. 260, p. 3274–3277.Google Scholar
  31. Mandelbrot, B B., 1967, How Long is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension: Science, v. 156, p. 636–638.Google Scholar
  32. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1975, Stochastic Models for the Earth's Relief, the Shape and the Fractal Dimension of the Coastlines, and the Number-Area Rule for Islands: Proc. National Acad. Sci. (USA), v. 72, p. 3825–3828.Google Scholar
  33. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1977, Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension: Freeman, San Francisco, 361 p.Google Scholar
  34. Mandelbrot, B. B., 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature: Freeman, San Francisco, 460 p.Google Scholar
  35. Mandelbrot, B. B. and Wallis, J. R., 1969, Computer Experiments with Fractional Gaussian Noises. Part 3, Mathematical Appendix: Water Resour. Res., v. 5, p. 260–267.Google Scholar
  36. Mandelbrot, B. B. and Van Ness, J. W., 1968, Fractional Brownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications: Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. Rev., v. 10, p. 422–437.Google Scholar
  37. Mark, D. M., 1984, Fractal Dimension of a Coral Reef at Ecological Scales: A Discussion: Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser., v. 14, p. 293–294.Google Scholar
  38. Mark, D. M. and Aronson, P. B., 1984, Scale Dependent Fractal Dimensions of Topographic Surfaces: An Empirical Investigation with Applications in Geomorphology and Computer Mapping: Math. Geol., v. 16, p. 671–683.Google Scholar
  39. Matheron, G., 1965, Les Variables Régionalisées et Leur Estimation: Masson, Paris; 305 p.Google Scholar
  40. McBratney, A. B. and Webster, R., 1986, Choosing Functions for Semi-Variograms of Soil Properties and Fitting Them to Sampling Estimates: Jour. Soil Sci., v. 37, p. 617–639.Google Scholar
  41. McDonald, B. C. and Banerjee, I., 1971, Sediments and Bed Forms on a Braided Outwash Plain: Can. Jour. Earth Sci., v. 8, p. 1282–1301.Google Scholar
  42. Naden, P. M., 1987, Modelling Gravel-Bed Topography from Sediment Transport: Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms: v. 12, p. 353–367.Google Scholar
  43. Naden, P. M. and Brayshaw, A. C., 1987, Small and Medium Scale Bedforms in Gravel-Bed Rivers,in Richards, K. S. (Ed.), River Channels: Environment and Process: Institute of British Geographers Special Publication; Basil Blackwell, Oxford, p. 249–271.Google Scholar
  44. Nordin, C. F., 1971, The Statistical Properties of Dune Profiles: U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Papers, 562-F, 41 p.Google Scholar
  45. Nordin, C. F. and Algert, J. H., 1966, Spectral Analysis of Sand Waves: Jour. Hydraul. Div. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., v. 92, p. 95–114.Google Scholar
  46. Numerical Algorithms Group, 1977, NAG Library Manual. Mark 6: Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Oliver, M. A. and Webster, R., 1986, Semi-Variogram for Modelling the Spatial Pattern of Landform and Soil Properties: Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms, v. 11, p. 491–504.Google Scholar
  48. Orey, S., 1970, Gaussian Sample Functions and the Hausdorff Dimension of Level Crossings: Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Geb., v. 15, p. 249–256.Google Scholar
  49. Orford, J. D. and Whalley, W. B., 1983, The Use of the Fractal Dimension to Quantify the Morphology of Irregular Shaped Particles: Sedimentology, v. 30, p. 655–668.Google Scholar
  50. Plate, E., 1971, Limitations of Spectral Analysis in the Study of Wind-Generated Water Surface Waves,in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Stochastic Hydraulics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, p. 522–539.Google Scholar
  51. Pratt, C. J. and Smith, K. V. H., 1972, Ripple and Dunes Phases in a Narrowly Graded Sand: Jour. Hydraul. Div. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng., v. 98, p. 859–873.Google Scholar
  52. Reid, I.; Frostick, L. E.; and Layman, J. T., 1985, The Incidence and Nature of Bedload Transport During Flood Flows in Coarse-Grained Alluvial Channels: Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms, v. 10, p. 33–44.Google Scholar
  53. Reid, I. and Frostick, L. E., 1986, Dynamics of Bedload Transport in Turkey Brook, a Coarse-Grained Alluvial Channel: Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, v. 11, p. 143–155.Google Scholar
  54. Richards, K. S., 1982, Rivers. Form and Process in Alluvial Channels: Methuen, London, 358 p.Google Scholar
  55. Richards, K. S. and Robert, A., 1986, Laboratory Experiments with the HR Multipurpose Profile Follower on a Rippled Sand Bed: Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, 22 p.Google Scholar
  56. Robert, A. and Richards, K. S., in press, On the Modelling of Sand Bedforms Using the Semivariogram: Earth Surf. Process. Landforms.Google Scholar
  57. Simons, D. B. and Richardson, E. V., 1966, Resistance to Flow in Alluvial Channels: U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper, 422-J., 61 p.Google Scholar
  58. Simons, D. B.; Richardson, E. V.; and Nordin, C. F., 1965, Bedload Equation for Ripples and Dunes: U.S. Geol. Sur. Prof. Paper, 462-H., 9 p.Google Scholar
  59. Thomes, J. B., 1970, The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels in the Xingu-Araguaia Headwaters: Geog. Jour., v. 136, p. 376–382.Google Scholar
  60. Yalin, M. S., 1977, Mechanics of Sediment Transport, 2nd Ed.: Pergamon Press, Oxford, 298 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Robert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations