Abstract
More and more tax limitation initiatives seem to be put forth for voters approval and several have passed which have implications for higher education. While those passed differ from each other substantially, a case study on the effects of Proposition 13, the first to pass in U.S., on California higher education has been instructive. Community colleges had to temporarily reduce some of their programs, primarily in adult and non-credit education, which have since been restored on a fee basis. Additionally, the control for community colleges has been shifted to the state. The four-year colleges and universities have also been indirectly affected as reflected by substantial increase in student fees when the state surplus was exhausted. Finally, despite seemingly devastating effects, most states which have been affected have learned to cope with decreasing or stabilized financial support.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
California Higher Education. Cover story: A developing concern. (2),9, (1984) 11–13.
Jackson, G. A. Community colleges in the post-13 era: Institutional responses to tax limitation.Community/Junior College Research Quarterly, 5 (1981) 141–66.
Lombardi, J. Proposition 13: Is the worst over for the community colleges?Community College Review, (6),4, (1979).
McCuen, J. T. & Hoffland, G. Jarvis fallout.Change in Higher Education, (10),10 (1978) 48–9.
McGuire, W. G. Emerging trends in state support.New Directions for Community Colleges #22. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978, pp. 15–26.
McKinley, D. California schools: Life after proposition 13 and other tax limitations.Contemporary Education, (55),3, (1984) 144–48.
Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education.Tuition and Fees in Public Higher Education in the West, 1982–83. Boulder, CO: WICHE-Information Clearinghouse, Information Series #6. 1982.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Permaul, J.S. Tax limitation initiatives and their impact on higher education: A case study. Innov High Educ 9, 138–147 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889731
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889731