Skip to main content
Log in

Integration of non-traditional programs into the mainstream of academic institutions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higher education's efforts to respond to the growing demand for non-traditional programs and services have resulted in the proliferation of external degree programs. The present inquiry examines the status of these programs in traditional institutions. Basing evaluation on the guidelines set forth by the Carnegie Commission for Non-Traditional Study (1973), the author suggests that external programs have not achieved the desired degrees of integration into the academic mainstream. Diverse management and planning approaches that might facilitate institutional adaptation and enhance program strength and viability are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cameron, K.S. Critical questions in assessing organizational effectiveness.Organizational Dynamics, Autumn, 1980,9, 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S. Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities.Academy of Management Journal, 1981,24, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S. Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education.Administrative Science Quarterly, December 1978,23, 604–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S., & Whetten, D.A.Organizational effectiveness: a comparison of multiple models. N.Y.: Academic Press, Inc., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Non-Traditional Study.Diversity by design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, K.E. The educational future: policies for continuing education. In R.H. Linnell (Ed.),Dollars and scholars. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, K.E., & Linnell, R.H. How and for what are professors paid?National Forum, Spring 1980,60(2), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle, CO.The external degree. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.E., III.Pay and organizational effectiveness: a psychological view. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R.E., & Cameron, K.S. Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence.Management Science January 1983,29, 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.A. Faculty compensation in continuing education: theory versus practice.Continuum, May 1984,48(2), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.C. Diversity of academic organizations, faculty incentives.Journal of Higher Education, 1978,49, 403–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • A Study of collegiate off-campus centers in Westchester County, 1977–78. Albany, N.Y.: New York State Education Department, 1978 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 160 004).

  • Sullivan, E.J. (Ed.)Guide to external degree programs in the United States. The American Council on Education/Macmillan Series in Higher Education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D.A. Interorganizational relations: a review of the field.Journal of Higher Education, 1981,52, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, J.A. Integration of non-traditional programs into the mainstream of academic institutions. Innov High Educ 9, 81–91 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889725

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889725

Keywords

Navigation