Skip to main content
Log in

Faculty perceptions of job rewards and instructional development activities

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of faculty at a large urban university concerning: (a) personal and college rewards for various areas of job responsibilities, and (b) which programs and incentives to enhance teaching effectiveness would be most attractive to them. Faculty generally reported both teaching and scholarly activity to be personally rewarding, but perceived discrepancies between personal and college rewards for teaching, and between college rewards for teaching and scholarly activity. Although a wide range of instructional development programs and incentives was endorsed, the top rated options referred to institutional recognition of teaching excellence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of American Colleges. (1985).Integrity in the College Curriculum: A Report to the Academic Community. Washington, D.C.

  • Berman, J., & Skeff, K.M. (1988). Developing the motivation for improving university teaching.Innovative Higher Education, 12, 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.A., & Schuster, J.H. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E.L. (1987).College: The Undergraduate Experience in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.M., Corcoran, M., & Lewis, D.E. (1986). The case for an institutional perspective on faculty development.Journal of Higher Education, 57, 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. (1983).General Education Today. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W.H., Wilke, P.K., & Lovrich, N.P. (1986). Dimensions of stress among University faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national study.Research in Higher Education, 24, 266–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasten, K.L. (1984). Tenure and merit pay for research, teaching, and service at a research institution.Journal of Higher Education, 55, 500–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, L., Wick, D.L., & Hoffman, M.J. (1984). Beyond breadth: General Education in the research university.Liberal Education, 70, 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscatine, C. (1985). Faculty responsibility for the curriculum.Academe, 71, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D.S., & Mayfield, J.R. (1982). Are there any rewards for teaching?Improving College and University Teaching, 30, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prologue and major recommendations of Carnegie Foundations report on colleges. (1986, November).The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following persons with this project: Nellie Bess, Gilbert Braun, Donald Brewer, Eileen Duffy-Blair, Gary Duncan, Daniel Funk, James West, Cheryl White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, E.P., Kinnetz, P. & Owens-Misner, N. Faculty perceptions of job rewards and instructional development activities. Innov High Educ 14, 123–130 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889613

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889613

Keywords

Navigation