Skip to main content
Log in

Why farmers rotate fields in maize-cassava-plantain bush fallow agriculture in the wet Peruvian Amazon

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maize (Zea mays) -cassava (Manihot esculenta)-Musarelay-cropped sequence as practiced among 28 Yanesha families in the Palcazu Valley in Central Amazonian Peru was surveyed to determine why farmers rotate fields into bush fallow. Typically, this sequence is planted on alluvial Inceptisols after the clearing of 2–5 year tree and shrub growth. During the 18–30 months of cropping, fields showed a buildup of weeds and an increase in banana stem borer and nutrient deficiency symptoms. Farmers attributed the decline in Musayields from the first to third harvests to stem borer, weeds, or soil infertility but were not unanimous. Any or all of these factors facilitate the decision to abandon a field. A 3-year record of fields cleared by each farm family indicated that field rotation stems from two independent decisions: selection of a fallowed field to clear for maize and vegetables, important for family nutrition, which are planted right after field clearing, and discontinuation of weeding in old fields as labor is used primarily on new fields, a decision leading to bush fallow recovery. Work with these families during 4 years suggests that the distribution of land and labor is based on a sense of relative labor productivity, on diverse dietary needs and preferences, and on the maintenance of a balance between areas in cropping and under fallow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, P. (1974). Some observations on basic and applied research in shifting cultivation. InShifting Agriculture and Soil Conservation in Africa. FAO Soils Bulletin 24, Rome, pp. 166–206.

  • Allen, W., and Tizon, J. (1973). Land use patterns among the Campa of the Alto Pachitea, Peru. In Lathrap, D., Douglas, J. (eds.),Variation in Anthropology. Illinois Archeological Survey, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1976). Report on panel discussion: Plant protection in bananas and plantains.Fruits 31(9): 511–512.

  • Aweto, A. (1981). Fallowing and soil fertility restoration in southwestern Nigeria.Journal of Tropical Geography 3: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, S. (1987). Swidden in Amazonia and the Amazon Rim. In B. Turner and S. Brush (eds.),Comparative Farming Systems. The Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeroo-Campagne, M. (1956). L'agriculture nomade-Pt. II: L'agriculture nomade de la tribu des N'Dranouas en Cote d'Ivoire, FAO. In P. Nye and D. Greenland (eds.),The Soil under Shifting Cultivation. Technical Communication No. 51, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, R. (1980).Amazonian Economics. DellPlain Latin American Studies, 6, Department of Geography, Syracuse, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1965).The Conditions for Agricultural Growth; The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C. (1976). Maintenance of agriculture and human habitats with the tropical forest ecosystem.Human Ecology 4(3): 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coene, R., de (1956). Agricultural settlement schemes in the Belgian Congo.Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 33: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowgill, U. (1960). Soil fertility, population, and the ancient Maya.Proceedings of National Academy of Science 46(8): 1009–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, W. (1978).Applied Non-Parametric Statistics. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. (1971). Campa subsistence in the Gran Pajonal, Eastern Peru.The Geographical Review LXI(4): 496–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. (1981). Swiddens and cattle vs. forest: The imminent demise of the Amazonian rain forest reexamined. InWhere Have all the Flowers Gone: Deforestation in the Third World. Studies in Third World Societies No. 13, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, pp. 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W., and Padoch, C. (1987). Swidden-fallow agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon.Advances in Economic Botany 5.

  • Emerson, R. (1953). A preliminary survey of the milpa system of maize culture as practiced by the Maya Indians of the northern part of the Yucatan Peninsula.Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 40: 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. (1977). Differences between wet and dry successional tropical ecosystems.Geo-Eco Trop 1: 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillo, E. (1984). 25 a¯nos de investigación agropecuario en la Amazonia Peruana. Inventario y evaluación. In Gasche, J., and Arroyo, J. (eds.),Balances Amazónicos. CIAAP, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru, pp. 69–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. (1983). Monoculture, polyculture, and polyvariety in tropical forest swidden cultivation.Human Ecology 11(1): 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (1971). The ecology of swidden cultivation in the Upper Orinoco rain forest, Venezuela.The Geographical Review 61(4): 475–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. (1979). DECORANA — A fortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging.Cornell Ecology Programs 40.

  • Johnson, A. (1983). Machiguenga gardens. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.),Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic Press, pp. 29–63.

  • Kunstadter, P., Chapman, E., and Sabhari, S. (1978).Farmers in the Forest. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J., and Arnason, J. (1986). Nutrient dynamics in milpa agriculture and the role of weeds in initial stages of secondary succession in Belize, CA.Plant and Soil 93: 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leihner, D. (1983).Management and Evaluation of Intercropping Systems with Cassava. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manner, H. (1981). Ecological succession in new and old swiddens of montane Papua-New Guinea.Human Ecology 9(3): 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, K. (1978). An ecological study of swidden agriculture at a village in northern Thailand.South East Asian Studies 16(3): 411–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1960). Shifting cultivation and crop rotations in the tropics.The Papua-New Guinea Agricultural Journal 13(3): 81–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, P., and Greenland, D. (1960). The soil under shifting cultivation. Technical Communication No. 51, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, P., and Stephens, D. (1962). Soild fertility. In Wills, J. (ed.),Agriculture and Land Use in Ghana. Oxford University Press, pp. 127–143.

  • Ofori, C. (1974). La agricultura migratoria-razones en que se sustenta su practica.La Agricultura Migratoriay la Conservation de Suelos en Africa. FAO Soils Bulletin 24, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman, R. (1964).Shifting Cultivation and Field Rotation. Wageningen, Holland.

  • ONERN (1982).Inventoria y Evaluation Semi-Detallado de los Recursos Naturales en la Zona del Rio Palcazu. Lima, Peru.

  • Posey, D., and Balee, W. (1988). Resource management in Amazonia: Indigenous and folk strategies.Advances in Economic Botany 7.

  • Ramakrishnan, P., and Toky, O. (1981). Soil nutrient status of hill agro-ecosystems and recovery patterns after slash-and-burn in northeastern India.Plant and Soil 60(1): 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reategui, A. (1985). Informe de trabajo de campo CCNN Shiringamazu. Unpublished manuscript, PEPP/USAID, Iscozacin, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthenberg, H. (1976).Farming Systems in the Tropics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldarriaga, J. (1987). Recovery following shifting agriculture. In Jordan, C. (ed.),Amazonian Rain Forests-Ecosystem Disturbance and Recovery. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salick, J. (1988). Ecological basis of Amuesha agriculture, Peruvian Upper Amazon.Advances in Economic Botany 7.

  • Sanchez, P. (1976).Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Sanchez, P., and Benites, J. (1987). Low input cropping for acid soils of the humid tropics.Sciences 238: 1521–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, P., and Nurena, M. (1972). Upland Rice Improvement under Shifting Cultivation Systems in the Amazon Basin of Peru. North Carolina Agriculture Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 210, Raleigh, North Carolina.

  • Sanchez, P., Bandy, D., Villachica, H., and Nicholaides, J. (1982). Amazon basin soils: Management for continuous crop production.Science 216: 821–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seavoy, R. (1973). The shading cycle in shifting cultivation.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 63(4): 522–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N. (1973).Los Platanos. Editorial Blume, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1981).Land, Natural Resources, and Economic Development of the Amuesha Native Communities in the Palcazu Valley. Cultural Survival, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver, C. (1984). Agroforestry Approaches to the Sustained Development of the Central Peruvian Amazon. First Seminar on the Humid Tropics, Belem, Brazil.

  • Staver, C. (1988). The Role of Crop Sequence, Weeds, and Trees in Amazonian Bush Fallow Agriculture. Ph.D. dissertation, Vegetable Crops Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steggarda, M. (1941). Mayan Indians of the Yucatan. Carnegie Institute Publications 531, Washington, D.C.

  • Stocks, A. (1983). Candoshi and Cocamilla swidden in Eastern Peru.Human Ecology 11(1): 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocks, A. (1985). Subsistencia en las comunidades nativas del valle del Palcazu. Unpublished manuscript, PEPP/USAID, Iscozacin, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, C. (1987). Factors controlling succession following slash-and-burn agriculture in Amazonia.Journal of Ecology 75(2): 377–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, C., and Jordan, C. (1984). Succession and nutrient dynamics following forest cutting and burning in Amazonia.Ecology 65(5): 1476–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, C., and Murphy, P. (1981). A comparison of productivities and energy values between slash-and-burn agriculture and secondary succession in the Upper Rio Negro region of the Amazon Basin.Agro-ecosystems 7(1): 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, D. (1979). Population and agricultural intensity in the humid tropics.Human Ecology 7(3): 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, W. (1983). Tropical forestry mimicry in swiddens: A reassessment of Geertz's model with Amazonian data.Human Ecology 11(1): 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, H. (1953). The maintenance of soil fertility at Ibadan, Nigeria, 1922–1951.Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 82: 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M., and Sanchez, P. (1983). Mulching and green manure applications for continuous crop production in the Amazon basin.Agronomy Journal 75: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, R. (1971). Shifting Cultivation in Latin America. Forestry Bulletin 17, FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staver, C. Why farmers rotate fields in maize-cassava-plantain bush fallow agriculture in the wet Peruvian Amazon. Hum Ecol 17, 401–426 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889498

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889498

Key words

Navigation