Abstract
In a recent work on the Tzotzil (Maya) of Chiapas, Mexico, George Collier has suggested that indigenous groups frequently employ agricultural practices which are in “obvious disequilibrium” with their environment. As a result, he claims, such groups bring about the permanent destruction of their lands and forests. In this article, historical and demographic evidence is presented to demonstrate that the development of commencal agriculture outside of native communities, not overpopulation or technological conservatism within them, lies at the heart of such destruction. Finally, it is argued that anthropologists must consider the evolution of social classes in rural areas if they are to understand the difficulties which economic development entails.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguirre Beltran, G. (1967).Regiones de Refugio. Instituto Indigenista Interamericano, Mexico.
Calnek, E. (1970). Los pueblos indfgenas de las tierras altas. In McQuown, N., and Pitt-Rivers, J. (eds.),Ensayos Antropológicos. Institute Nacional Indigenista, Mexico.
Collier, G. (1975).Fields of the Tzotzil. The Ecological Bases of Tradition in Chiapas. The University of Texas Press, Austin and London.
MacLeod, M. (1973).Spanish Central America. A Socioeconomic History, 1520–1720. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Nash, M. (1970). The impact of mid-nineteenth century change upon the Indians of Middle America. In Morner, M. (comp.),Race and Class in Latin America. Columbia University Press, New York.
Nigh, R. (1976). Evolutionary ecology of Maya agriculture in highland Chiapas, Mexico. PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University.
Pozas, R. (1959).Chamula: un pueblo indio de los alto de Chiapas, México. Instituto Nacional Indigenista, Mexico.
Pozas, R., and Pozas, I. (1971).Los indios en las clases sociales de México. Siglo XXI, Mexico.
Rus, J. (1976). Managing Mexico's Indians: The historical context and consequences of indigenismo. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University.
Rus, J., and Wasserstrom, R. (1978). Evangelization and political control: The SIL in Mexico. In Aaby, P., and Hvalkof, S. (eds.),SIL and the Bibleless Tribes. Institut for Etnologi og Anthropologi, Copenhagen (forthcoming).
Stavenhagen, R. (1968). Seven fallacies about Latin America. In Petras, J., and Zeitlin, M. (eds.),Latin America: Reform or Revolution. Fawcett Publications, New York.
Stavenhagen, R. (1969).Las clases sociales en las sociedades agrarias. Siglo XXI, Mexico.
Waibel, L. (1946).La Sierra Madre de Chiapas. Sociedad de Geografía y Estadistica, Mexico.
Wasserstrom, R. (1976a). La evolución de la economia de Chiapas: 1528–1975.America Indígena: 479–498.
Wasserstrom, R. (1976b).Minifundismo y trabajo asalariado. Estudio de Caso II: San Juan Chamula. Informe Preliminar. Centro de Investigaciones Ecológicas del Surèste, San San Cristóbal, Chiapas.
Wasserstrom, R. (1976c). La investigación regional en ciencias sociales: una perspectiva chiapaneca.Historia y Sociedad 9: 58–73.
Wasserstrom, R. (1977). White fathers and red souls: Indian-Ladino relations in highland Chiapas (1528–1973). PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University.
Wellhausen, E. J. (1976). The agriculture of Mexico.Scientific American 3: 128–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wasserstrom, R. Population growth and economic development in Chiapas, 1524–1975. Hum Ecol 6, 127–143 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889091
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889091