Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre

, Volume 89, Issue 1, pp 123–130 | Cite as

The mutagenic action of pyronin in Drosophila

  • A. M. Clark
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    When tested by injection or by the feeding method, pyronin is mutagenic inDrosophila, but there is extreme heterogeneity in the response.

     
  2. 2.

    The mutagenic effectiveness of the dye seems to be restricted to gonial cells.

     
  3. 3.

    Attempts to enhance the effectiveness of the dye by supplementary chemical and physical treatments all failed.

     
  4. 4.

    Pyronin can inhibit a number of enzymes. However, the mode of action in producing genetic effects is still obscure.

     

Keywords

Enzyme Genetic Effect Mutagenic Action Physical Treatment Feeding Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Auerbach, C.: Problems in chemical mutagenesis. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.16, 199 (1951).Google Scholar
  2. —: The mutagenic action of pyronin B. Amer. Naturalist89, 241 (1955).Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach, C., andH. Moser: An analysis of the mutagenic action of formaldehyde food. I. Sensitivity of Drosophila germ cells. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre85, 479 (1953).Google Scholar
  4. Battaglia, E.: Nuove sostanze inducenti frammentazione cromosomica. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli22 (Suppl.) 125 (1950).Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, H.: Die Dosisabhängigkeit röntgeninduzierter Chromosomenmutationen im Ring-X Chromosom von Drosophila melanogaster. Naturwissenschaften27, 821 (1939).Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. M.: The mutagenic activity of dyes in Drosophila melanogaster. Amer. Naturalist87, 295 (1953).Google Scholar
  7. Döring, H.: Photosensibilisierung der Gene? Naturwissenschaften26, 819 (1938).Google Scholar
  8. Edds, Mac V.: Collateral nerve regeneration. Quart. Rev. Biol.28, 260 (1953).Google Scholar
  9. Fabergé, A. C., andJ. D. Mohler: Breakage of chromosomes produced by ultra-violet radiation in Drosophila. Nature (Lond.)169, 278 (1951).Google Scholar
  10. Hadorn, E., andH. Niggli: Mutations in Drosophila after chemical treatment of gonads in vitro. Nature (Lond.)157, 162 (1946).Google Scholar
  11. Herskowitz, I. H.: The differential induction of lethal mutations by formalin in the two sexes of Drosophila. Science112, 302 (1950).Google Scholar
  12. Hoffman, H.: Acceleration and retardation of the process of axon sprouting in partially denervated muscle. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci.30, 541 (1953).Google Scholar
  13. Kupka, E.: Über die Wirkung von Pyroninlösung auf die Epidermiszellen der Larven von Triton alpestris. Öst. zool. Z.5, 442 (1955).Google Scholar
  14. Lea, D., andD. G. Catcheside: Dominant lethals and chromosome breaks in ring-X chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet.47, 25 (1945).Google Scholar
  15. Levine, R. P.: Chromosome structure and the mechanism of crossing-over. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)41, 727 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. Mazia, D.: The particulate organisation of the chromosome. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)40, 521 (1954).Google Scholar
  17. Sobels, F. H.: The effect of pretreatment with cyanide and azide on the rate of X-ray induced mutations in Drosophila. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- und Vererb.-Lehre85, 399 (1955).Google Scholar
  18. —: Studies on the mutagenic action of formaldehyde in Drosophila. II. The production of mutations in females and the induction of crossing-over. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre87, 743 (1956).Google Scholar
  19. Witkin, E.: Mutations in Escherichia coli induced by chemical agents. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.12, 256 (1957).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1958

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourne N. 3Australia

Personalised recommendations