Skip to main content

Systematic Realism

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Bibliography

  1. Achinstein, P.,Concepts of Science, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Achinstein, P., ‘On The Meaning of Scientific Terms’,The Journal of Philosophy 61 (1964), 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Achinstein, P., ‘Acute Proliferitis’, inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (ed. by R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky) Humanities Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. (eds.),The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agassi, J., ‘The Nature of Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics’, inThe Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy (ed. by M. Bunge), The Free Press, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong, D. M.,Perception and the Physical World, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aune, B.,Knowledge, Mind and Nature, Random House, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aune, B.,Rationalism, Empiricism and Pragmatism: An Introduction, Random House, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ayer, A. J.,Language, Truth and Logic, Dover, New York, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bateson, G.,Steps to An Ecology of Mind, Ballantine, 1972.

  11. Beth, E. W.,The Foundations of Mathematics, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bohnert, H., ‘Communication by Ramsey-Sentence Clause’,Philosophy of Science 34 (1967), 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bohnert, H., ‘In Defense of Ramsey's Elimination Method’,The Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968), 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braithwaite, R. B.,Scientific Explanation, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bunge, M.,Scientific Research, Volumes I & II, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bunge, M., ‘Theory Meets Experience’, publication of the Institut för Vetenskapsteori, Göteborg, August 1971.

  17. Bunge, M.,The Myth of Simplicity, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall New Jersey, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burtt, E. A.,The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Butts, R. E., ‘Feyerabend and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation’,Philosophy of Science 33 (1966), 383.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Butts, R. E. (ed.),William Whewell's Theory of Scientific Method, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 1968.

  21. Campbell, D. T., ‘Methodological Suggestions from a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes’,Inquiry 2 (1959), 152–182.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell, N. R.,Foundations of Physics, Dover, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carnap, R.,The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carnap, R., ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’ inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I (ed. by H. Feigl and M. Scriven), Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cornman, J. W., ‘Craig's Theorem, Ramsey-Sentences and Scientific Instrumentalism’,Synthese 25 (1972), 82–128.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Duhem, P.,The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Atheneum, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Feyerabend, P. K., ‘Problems of Empiricism’, inPittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (ed. by R. Colodny), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Feyerabend, P. K., ‘Problems of Empiricism II’ inPittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV (ed. by R. Colodny), Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feyerabend, P. K., ‘Das Problem der Existenz Theoretischer Entitäten’, inProbleme der Erkenntnistheorie, Festschrift für Viktor Kraft, Vienna 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Feyerabend, P. K., ‘An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58 (1958).

  31. Feyerabend, P. K.,Knowledge Without Foundation, Oberlin College, mimeographed, 1961.

  32. Feyerabend, P. K., ‘Againat Method’, inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV (ed. by M. Radner and S. Winokur), Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feyerabend, P. K., ‘On the Meaning of Scientific Terms’,The Journal of Philosophy 62 (1965), 266.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fine, A., ‘Consistency, Derivability and Scientific Change’,The Journal of Philosophy 62 (1967), 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Foster, M. H. and Martin, M. L.,Probability, Confirmation and Simplicity, Odyssey Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fraassen, B. C. van, ‘On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories’,Philosophy of Science 37 (1970), 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fraassen, B. C. van, ‘A Formal Approach to The Philosophy of Science’, inParadigms and Paradoxes (ed. by R. Colodny), Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. V, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Frege, G., ‘On the Foundations of Geometry’ (transl. by M. E. Szabo),Philosophical Review 69 (1960); (first published in 1903).

  39. Giere, R., ‘Objective Statistical Methods and Scientific Enquiry’, to appear in the proceedings of The Conference on Foundations of Probability, Statistical Inference and Statistical Theories of Science, The Univ. of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science (ed. by W. A. Harper and C. A. Hooker), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

  40. Graves, J. C.,The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gregory, R. L.,Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing, McGraw-Hill, World Univ. Library, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Grünbaum, A.,Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, A. A. Knopf, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Haber, R. N. (ed.),Information-Processing Approaches to Visual Perception, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hanson, N. R.,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hanson, N. R.,Concept of the Position, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Harré, R.,The Principles of Scientific Thinking, MacMillan, London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hempel, C., ‘Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11 (1950), 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hempel, C., ‘The Theoretician's Dilemma’, inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1958.

  49. Hempel, C., ‘On the ‘Standard Conception’ of Scientific Theory’, inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV. (ed. by M. Radner and S. Winokur), Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hempel, C.,Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science, The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hempel, C.,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Henkin, L., Suppes, P., Tarski, A.,The Axiomatic Method, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hesse, M.,Models and Analogies in Science, Sheed & Ward, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hesse, M.,Forces and Fields, Littlefield, Adams, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hesse, M., ‘Fine's Criteria for Meaning Change’,The Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hesse, M., ‘A Self-Correcting Observation Language’, inLogic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III (ed. by B. van Rootselaar and J. F. Staal), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hesse, M., ‘Is There an Independent Observation Language?’, inThe Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (ed. by R. G. Colodny), Univ. of Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 1970.

  58. Hooker, C. A., ‘Secondary Qualities and Systematic Philosophy’, Ph.D. Thesis, York University, 1970. In preparation as a book.

  59. Hooker, C. A., ‘Craigian Transcriptionism’,American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1968), 1952–163.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hooker, C. A., ‘Five Arguments Against Craigian Transcriptionism’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1968), 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hooker, C. A., ‘The Referencial Function of Bound Variables’,Mind 80 (1971), 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hooker, C. A., ‘Critical Notice: Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.), Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1972), 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hooker, C. A., ‘Critical Notice: Against Method, P. K. Feyerabend’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1972) 489–509.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hooker, C. A., ‘The Nature of Quantum Mechanical Reality: Einstein Versus Bohr’, inParadox and Paradigm, Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science V (ed. by R. G. Colodny), 1972.

  65. Hooker, C. A., ‘Metaphysics and Modern Physics: A Prolegomenon to the Understanding of Quantum Theory’, inContemporary Research in The Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory (ed. by C.A. Hooker), Dordrecht, Reidel, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hooker, C. A., ‘Empiricism, Perception and Conceptual Change’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hooker, C. A., ‘The Relational Doctrines of Space and Time’,The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 22 (1971), 97–130.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hooker, C. A., ‘Defense of a Non-Conventionalist Approach to Classical Mechanics’, inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science XIII, 1974.

  69. Hooker, C. A., ‘The Non-Necessity of Qualitative Content’,Dialogue 12 (1973).

  70. Hooker, C. A., ‘The Philosophy of Paul K. Feyerabend: A Critique’, to be published.

  71. Hooker, C. A., ‘Global Theories’, to appear.

  72. Hooker, C. A., ‘The Metaphysics of Science: Atoms vs Plena’, to appear inInternational Logic Review.

  73. Hooker, C. A., ‘Has the Scientist any Future in the Brave New World?’, a paper read at the 500th Anniversary of the Birth of Nicholas Copernicus, Conference, Ann Arbor, Mich., April 1973. To appear in the proceedings.

  74. Hooker, C. A., ‘Remarks on the Philosophical Uses of the Information-Processing Approach to the Brain’, not yet published.

  75. Hospers, J.,An Introduction to Philosophical Analyses, Englewood Cliffes, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hull, R. T., ‘Feyerabend's Attack on Observation Sentences’,Synthese 23 (1972), 374–399.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kohler, I., ‘Experiments with Goggles’,Scientific American, May, 1962.

  78. Körner, S., ‘On Philosophical Arguments in Physics’, inObservation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics (ed. by S. Körner), Dover, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Koyré, A.,Metaphysics and Measurement, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Koyré, A.,From Closed Space to Infinite Universe, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kuhn, T.,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Leach, J. J. (ed.),Inductive Aspects of Knowledge: Readings in Recent Epistemology, Univ. of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, to appear.

  84. Lewis, D., ‘How to Define Theoretical Terms’,The Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970), 427–445.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Luckenbach, S.,Probabilities, Problems and Paradoxes, Dickenson, California, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  86. McMullin, E., ‘What Do Physical Models Tell Us?’, inLogic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III (ed. by B. van Rootselaar and J. F. Staal), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Marras, A., ‘On Sellars' Linguistic Theory of Conceptual Activity’, inCanadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1973), 471–484.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Marras, A., ‘Conceptual Activity, Rules and Linguistic Actions: A Rejoinder to Wilfred Sellars’, inCanadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1973), 495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Maxwell, G., ‘The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities’, inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Maxwell, G., ‘Structural Realism and the Meaning of Theoretical Terms’, inMinnesota IV, See [32]. (ed. by

    Google Scholar 

  91. Maxwell, G., ‘Corroboration Without Demarkation’, inThe Philosophy of Karl Popper (ed. by P. S. Schilpp), LaSalle Ill. Open Court, forthcoming.

  92. Nagel, E.,The Structure of Science, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Nagel, T., ‘Brain Bisection and the Unity of Consciousness’,Synthese 22 (1971), 396–413.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Nash, L. K.,The Nature of the Natural Sciences, Little, Brown, Boston, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Pap, A.,An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Eyre & Spottiswoode, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Pap, A., ‘Does Science have Metaphysical Presuppositions?’, inReadings in the Philosophy of Science (ed by H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Piaget, J.,The Construction of Reality in the Child, Basic Books, New York 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Piaget, J.,Genetic Epistemology (transl. by E. Drakworth), Columbia, New York, 1970.

  99. Piaget, J.,Biology and Knowledge (transl. by B. Walsh), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Popper, K. R.,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Popper, K. R., ‘Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report’, inBritish Philosophy in the Mid-Century (ed. by C. A. Mace), Allen and Unwin, London, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pribram, K.,The Language of the Brain, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Putnam, H., ‘What Theories are Not’, inLogic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski), Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Putnam, H., ‘How Not to Talk About Meanings’ inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (ed. by R. S. Cohen and M. Wartofsky), Humanities Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Putnam, H., ‘The Analytic and the Synthetic’, inMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Quine, W. V. O.,From a Logical Point of View, Harper & Row, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Quine, W. V. O.,Word and Object, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Quine, W. V. O.,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ramsey, F. P.,The Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Reichenbach, H.,The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge, (transl. by M. Reichenbach), Univ. of California Press, Los Angeles, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Rudner, R., ‘An Introduction to Simplicity’,Philosophy of Science 28 (1961), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Russell, B.,Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Russell, B.,The Analysis of Matter, Allen & Unwin, London, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Schaffner, K. F., ‘Outlines of a Logic of Comparative Theory Evaluation with Special Attention to Pre- and Post-Relativistic Electrodynamics’, inHistorical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science (ed. by R. H. Stuewer), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, V, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Schick, K., ‘Indeterminacy of Translation’,Journal of Philosophy 69 (1972), 818–832.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Sellars, W.,Science, Perception and Reality, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Sellars, W., ‘Scientific Realism or Irenic Instrumentalism’, inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (ed. by R. S. Cohen and W. Wartofsky), Humanities Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Sellars, W., ‘The Identity Approach to the Mind Body Problem’, inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (ed. by B. Cohen and W. Wartofsky), Humanities Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Sellars, W., ‘Reply to Marras’,Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1973), 485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Shapere, D., ‘Space, Time and Language — An Examination of Some Problems and Methods of the Philosophy of Science’, inPhilosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar, Vol. 2, (ed. by B. Baumrin), Interscience, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Shapere, D., ‘Meaning and Scientific Change’, inMind and Cosmos (ed. by R. G. Colodny), Pittsburgh Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Smart, J. J. C.,Between Science and Philosophy, Random House, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Sneed, J. D.,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Humanities Press, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Suchting, W., ‘Deductive Explanation and Prediction Revisited’,Philosophy of Science 34 (1967), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Suppe, F., ‘What's Wrong With the Received View on The Structure of Scientific Theory?’,Philosophy of Science 39 (1972), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Suppe, F., ‘Theories, Their Formulations, and the Operational Imperative’,Synthese 25 (1972), 129–164.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Suppe, F. (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Suppe, F., ‘Theories and Phenomena’, forthcoming inTheory and Decision.

  129. Suppes, P.,Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science, Humanities Press, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Suppes, P., ‘What is a Scientific Theory?’, inPhilosophy of Science (ed. by A. Danto and S. Morgenbesser), World Publishing Co., New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Toulmin, S.,Foresight and Understanding, Harper & Row, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Toulmin, S. and Goodfield, J.,The Architecture of Matter, Pelican, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Whewell, W.,Novum Organon Renovatum, London, 1858.

  134. Whorf, B. L.,Language, Thought, and Reality (ed. by John B. Carroll), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Wilder, H., Toward a Naturalistic Theory of Meaning, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Western Ontario, March 1973.

  136. Wisdom, J. O., ‘Conventionalism, Truth, and Cosmological Furniture’; a paper read to the 1972 Philosophy of Science Association Meetings, Lansing.

  137. Wisdom, J. O., ‘Four Contemporary Interpretations of the Nature of Science’,Foundations of Physics 1 (1971), 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Wojciechowski, J., ‘The Ecology of Knowledge and Major Breakthroughs in Science’; a paper read to a Conference celebrating the 500th Anniversary of Nicholas Copernicus: Science and Society: Past, Present and Future, Ann Arbor, Michigan, April 1973 — to appear in the proceedings.

  139. Wyburn, C. M., Pickford, R. W. and Hirst, J.,The Human Senses and Perception, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Ziman, P.,Public Knowledge, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooker, C.A. Systematic Realism. Synthese 26, 409–497 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00883106

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00883106