Irrigation and Drainage Systems

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 85–103 | Cite as

Water distribution on a large distributary, Tungabhadra, India

Design and formal operation vs. actual procedures
  • Marinus Jurriëns
  • Marcel Kuper


Results are presented of field research on water distribution in the command area, covering 18,200 ha, of a secondary irrigation canal in the Tungabhadra Left Bank Scheme, Karnataka State, India.

The official objective of the Scheme and the resulting implications for the water distribution are discussed first. An explanation of the planning and operation of the water distribution follows.

The results are based on analyses of the water flows taken from the D36 secondary canal and distributed along the canal to the “pipe outlets” (inlet structures to the tertiary units), and of the canal section rotation practised along the canal. The analyses concentrate on three dimensions of the water supply:

The design flows, according to the official Scheme objectives and criteria;

The targets, as set by the system operators before every season;

The actual distribution procedures and flows, as observed during the operation.

The analyses, supported by flow measurement data, illustrate that the water distribution is not based on consistent and clear criteria and procedures, but that it is the outcome of varying compromises, decided upon pragmatically by the field staff, to bridge the gap between the farmers' demands and the upstream constraints to water availability. This paper explains the widespread phenomenon of head reaches taking too much water, leaving little or nothing for the tail end of the canal.

Key words

Canal management irrigation management O&M planning and operation water distribution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Government of Karnataka. 1976. Report on re-examination of cropping pattern under TBP left bank canal. Planning Department, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  2. Jurriëns M. 1987. Office documents and system reality: understanding the objectives and the system.WAMANA July: 19–26, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  3. Jurriëns M. 1989. Operational target discharges.WAMANA January: 34–41, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  4. Jurriëns M. 1991. An approach to research on irrigation system management. In:Annual Report 1990 (pp 15–26). ILRI, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  5. Jurriëns M., Ramaiah V. & van Alphen J.G. 1988. Irrigation water management in the Tungabhadra Scheme, India. In:Annual Report 1987 (pp 22–32). ILRI, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  6. Jurriëns M. & Ramaiah V. 1989. Water distribution in a secondary irrigation canal: results of a measurement program. In:Annual Report 1988 (pp 35–46). ILRI, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  7. Tungabhadra Project 1974.Irrigation manual for major and medium projects. Munirabad, Karnataka.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marinus Jurriëns
    • 1
  • Marcel Kuper
    • 2
  1. 1.International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRIWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.International Irrigation Management Institute/IIMILahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations