Summary
Alternative schemes to develop mining activities and related regional water resources in south western Sardinia are designed and compared from the viewpoint of the following six objectives: (1) to support mining activities under water hazard; (2) to ensure adequate wastewater disposal; (3) to satisfy projected water requirements over a 50 year horizon; (4) to support industrial and agricultural activities; (5) to preserve or improve environmental factors; (6) to be resilient.
Present mining activities do not occur at a satisfactory level because of water inrushes. At the same time, there is an inefficient distribution of existing resources — especially groundwater — as well as water quality problems. In the present study, the system in general, and then the triplet objectives — specifications — criteria, are defined; specifications include mining characteristics, regional surface and ground water hydrology, water requirements for various users in terms of: seasonal volumes and quality, levels of supply, reliability, unit cost and loss functions. Eleven criteria are defined including both qualitative ordinal measures such as quality indices, and quantitative ones, such as capital and operations costs.
Alternative decisions or pure actions may be: to do nothing, to utilize pumped mine water from existing system after treatment, to change the dewatering method so that soft and saline waters are extracted separately, to recharge used waters near the shore to create a pressure wall and thus avoid salt water intrusion, to reuse treated urban wastewater for agriculture and to decrease unit consumption. These pure actions are combined to form ten alternative schemes, which are rated in terms of the 11 criteria defined before.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardossy, A., Bogardi, I. and Duckstein, L. (1982) Decision models for bauxite mining under water hazard.Proceedings, First International Mine Water Congress of the International Mine Water Association, Budapest, pp. 18–39.
Carta, M. (1981)Les Eaux Souterraines dans les Mines Métalliferes de la Région sud-ouest de la Sardaigne, Report, Geological Engineering Department, University of Cagliari, Italy.
Casti, J. (1981) Topological methods for social and behavioral systems, presented at theNSF-DOT Conference on Nonlinear Dynamics General Urban/Regional Systems Theory, Washington, D.C., May 27–28. Available as paper no. 81-13, Systems and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
David, L. and Duckstein, L. (1976) Multi-criterion ranking of alternative long-range water resource systems,Water Resource Bulletin 12, 731–54.
Duckstein, L. (1979)Risk and Policy Analysis of the Israeli Three-Reservoir System, Report to Tahal, Tel-Aviv, Israel, available as Paper No. 79-9, Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Duckstein, L., Bogardi, I. and Szidarovszky, F. (1979) Trade-off between regional mining development and environmental impact,Proceedings, 16th International Symposium on Applications of Computers and OR in the Mineral Industry, SME/AIME Fall Meeting, October 17–19, Tucson, 355–364.
Gershon, M., Duckstein, L. and McAniff, R. (1982) Multiobjective river basin planning with qualitative criteria,Water Resources Research 18, 193–202.
Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J.R. and Loucks, D.P. (1982) Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance,Water Resources Research 18, 14–20.
Kazanowski, A.D. (1972) Treatment of some of the uncertainties encountered in the conduct of hydrologic cost-effectiveness evaluation,Proceedings, International Symposium on Uncertainties in Hydrologic and Water Resource Systems, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 771–85.
Kazanowski, A.D. (1968) ‘A Standardized Approach to Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation’ inCost-Effectiveness: The Economic Evaluation of Engineered Systems (edited by J. English), Wiley, New York, pp. 113–50.
Kempf, J. (1981) Multiple steady states and catastrophes in ecological models,Journal of the International Society of Ecological Modeling,2, 55–79.
Khalili, D. and Duckstein, L. (1982)Waste Disposal Systems: A Selection Methodology, paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Conference, San Diego, California, October 25–27. Available as paper no. 82-26, Systems and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
MacCrimmon, H.R. (1973) An overview of multiple objective decision making, inMultiple Criteria Decision Making (edited by J. Cochrane and M. Zeleny), University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp. 18–44.
Nachtnebel, H., Duckstein, L. and Bogardi, I. (1982) Evaluation of conflicting regional water requirements, an Austrian case study,Proceedings, IAHS Symposium, Exeter, UK, July, No. 135.
Nachtnebel, H., Bogardi, I. and Duckstein, L. (1981) Multicriterion analysis for regional water resource development,Proceedings, International Federation of Information Processing, Paper no. WG 7.1,Working Conference on Environmental Systems Analysis and Management, Rome, Italy, September, pp. 71–81.
Weber, J., Davis, D. and Duckstein, L. (1980)Bayes Versus Minimax Criteria: A Source of Conflict in Decision Making, Working Paper no. 80-4, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salis, M., Duckstein, L. Mining under a limestone aquifer in southern Sardinia: a multiobjective approach. International Journal of Mining Engineering 1, 357–374 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881551
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881551