Summary
The load carrying capacity of oil shale pillars excavated by conventional blasting can be increased significantly by presplit blasting and mechanical mining. Comparisons ofin situ vertical stresses and fractures obtained from overcoring horizontal holes in the Colony Mine, Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado indicate that conventional blasting causes a strength loss in a zone of damage approximately 3 m (10 ft) thick. Presplit blasting reduces damage significantly, and increases the load carrying capacity in the 3 m (10 ft) thick zone by 5.93 MPa (860 psi). Mechanical mining causes little or no rock damage, and an increase of 9.83 MPa (1425 psi) in strength in the same 3 m (10 ft) thick zone. Pillar design using presplit blasting and mechanical mining techniques can increase the extraction ratio by at least 3% and 5%, respectively, as compared to conventional blasting. It is speculated that comparable increases in extraction should also occur due to increases in span dimensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agapito, J.F.T. (1974) Rock mechanics applications to the design of oil shale pillars.Mining Engineering, May, pp. 20–5.
Agapito, J.F.T. and Hardy, M.P. (1982) Induced horizontal stress method of pillar design in oil shale.Proceedings of the 15th Oil Shale Symposium, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, pp. 179–91.
Agapito, J.F.T. and Page, J.B. (1976) A case study of long-term stability in the Colony oil shale mine, Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado.Proceedings of the 17th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Snowbird, Utah, p. 3A4-1-G.
Crookston, R.B., Weiss, D.A. and Weakly, L.A. (1983) Mechanical and conventional excavating experience in oil shale shafts and tunnels.Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agapito, J.F.T., Maleki, H.N., Aggson, J.R. et al. Impact of excavation technique on strength of oil shale pillars. International Journal of Mining Engineering 2, 93–105 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880875
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880875