Skip to main content
Log in

The characteristic displacement in rate and state-dependent friction from a micromechanical point of view

  • Published:
pure and applied geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The physical meaning of the characteristic displacement that has been observed in velocity-stepping friction experiments was investigated based on the micromechanics of asperity contact. It has been empirically found for bare rock surfaces that the magnitude of the characteristic displacement is dependent only on surface roughness and insensitive to both slip velocity and normal stress. Thus the characteristic displacement has been interpreted as the displacement required to change the population of contact points completely. Here arises a question about the physical mechanism by which the contact population changes. Because individual asperity contacts form, grow and are eliminated with displacement, there are at least two possible interpretations for the characteristic displacement: (1) it is the distance over which the contacts existing at the moment of the velocity change all fade away, being replaced by new asperity contacts, or (2) it is the distance required for a complete replacement in the real contact area that existed at the moment of the velocity change. In order to test these possibilities, theoretical models were developed based on the statistics of distributed asperity summits. A computer simulation was also performed to check the validity of the theoretical models using three-dimensional surface topography data with various surface roughnesses. The deformation was assumed to be elastic at each asperity contact. The results of both the simulation and the theoretical models show that the characteristic displacement in (1) is about three times longer than that in (2). Comparison of the results with the experimental observations obtained by others indicates that the possibility (2) is the correct interpretation. This means that the “state” in the rate and state variable friction law is memorized in a very confined area of real contact. Further, our results explain why the characteristic displacement is insensitive to normal stress: this comes from the fact that the microscopic properties such as the mean contact diameter are insensitive to normal stress. The approach based on the micromechanics of asperity contact is useful to investigate the underlying mechanism of various phenomena in rock friction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biegel, R. L., Sammis, C. G., andDieterich, J. H. (1989),The Frictional Properties of a Simulated Gouge Having a Fractal Particle Distribution, J. Structural Geol.11, 827–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boitnott, G. N., Biegel, R. L., Scholz, C. H., Yoshioka, N., andWang, W. (1992),Micromechanics of Rock Friction, 2: Quantitative Modeling of Initial Friction With Contact Theory, J. Geophys. Res.97, 8965–8978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R., andScholz, C. H. (1985),Closure of Random Elastic Surfaces in Contact, J. Geophys. Res.90, 5531–5545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R., andScholz, C. H. (1986),Closure of Rock Joints, J. Geophys. Res.91, 4939–4948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich, J. H. (1978),Time-dependent Friction and the Mechanics of Stick-slip, Pure and Appl. Geophys.116, 790–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich, J. H. (1979),Modeling of Rock Friction 1. Experimental Results and Constitutive Equations, J. Geophys. Res.84, 2161–2168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich, J. H. (1981),Constitutive properties of faults with simulated gouge. In:Mechanical Behavior of Crustal Rocks (eds.Carter, N. L. Friedman, M., Logan, J. M., andStearns, D. W.) Geophys. Monogr.24 (American Geophys. Union) pp. 103–120.

  • Dieterich, J. H., andKilgore, B. D. (1994),Direct Observation of Frictional Contacts: New Insights for State-dependent Properties, Pure and Appl. Geophys.143, 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. A., andWilliamson, J. (1966),Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces, Proc. R. Soc., London, Ser. A.295, 300–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. L.,Contact Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marone, C., andKilgore, B. (1993),Scaling of the Critical Slip Distance for Seismic Faulting with Shear Strain in Fault Zones, Nature362, 618–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marone, C., andCox, S. J. D. (1994),Scaling of Rock Friction Constitutive Parameters: The Effects of Surface Roughness and Cumulative Offset on Friction of Gabbro, Pure and Appl. Geophys.143, 359–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis, A.,Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz, E. (1965),Autocorrelation Analysis of the Sliding Process, J. Appl. Phys.27, 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruina, A. L. (1983),Slip Instability and State Variable Friction Laws, J. Geophys. Res.88, 10359–10370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammis, C. G., andSteacy, S. J. (1994),The Micromechanics of Friction in a Granular Layer, Pure and Appl. Geophys.143, 777–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. H., andEngelder, J. T. (1976),The Role of Asperity Indentation and Plaughing in Rock Friction: I. Asperity Creep and Stick-slip, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr.13, 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, G. (1983),Determination of Stiffness and Other Joint Properties from Roughness Measurement, Rock Mech. Rock Eng.16, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. B., andGrosenbaugh, M. A. (1979),A New Model for Analyzing the Effect of Fractures on Compressibility, J. Geophys. Res.84, 3532–3536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., andScholz, C. H. (1994a),Wear Processes During Frictional Sliding of Rock: A Theoretical and Experimental Study, J. Geophys. Res.99, 6789–6799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., andScholz, C. H. (1994b),Micromechanics of the Velocity and Normal Stress Dependence of Rock Friction, Pure and Appl. Geophys.143, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., andScholz, C. H. (1995),Micromechanics of Rock Friction, 3. Quantitative Modeling of Base Friction, J. Geophys. Res.100, 4243–4247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T.-F., Fredrich, J. T., andGwanmesia, G. D. (1989),Crack Aperture Statistics and Pore Space Fractal Geometry of Westerly Granite and Rutland Quartzite: Implications for an Elastic Contact of Rock Compressibility, J. Geophys. Res.94, 10267–10278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, N. (1994a),Elastic Behavior of Contacting Surfaces under Normal Loads: A Computer Simulation Using Three-dimensional Surface Topographies, J. Geophys. Res.99, 15549–15560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, N. (1994b),The Role of Plastic Deformation in Normal Loading and Unloading Cycles, J. Geophys. Res.99, 15561–15568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, N., andScholz, C. H. (1989a),Elastic Properties of Contacting Surfaces Under Normal and Shear Loads, 1. Theory, J. Geophys. Res.94, 17681–17690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, N., andScholz, C. H. (1989b),Elastic Properties of Contacting Surfaces Under Normal and Shear Loads, 2. Comparison of Theory With Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.94, 17691–17700.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshioka, N., Iwasa, K. The characteristic displacement in rate and state-dependent friction from a micromechanical point of view. PAGEOPH 147, 433–453 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878837

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878837

Key words

Navigation