Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 123, Issue 5, pp 757–775 | Cite as

On experiments using an auto-regressive moving-average model for predicting the monthly 50–100 kPa thickness anomalies

  • Leonard Steinberg
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

A series of 75 auto-regressive integrated moving-average (ARIMA) forecasts of monthly mean 100−50 kPa thickness anomalies with lead time of one month are produced for 455 grid points over the northern hemisphere. The results are indistinguishable from persistence forecasts when the scores are averaged over the domain. A more detailed view indicates some differences which may merit closer investigation. Differences in the behaviour of positive and negative anomaly forecasts are also described.

Some aspects of the methodology are discussed briefly in the introductory sections. The model used in the experiment is described in detail. A shortcoming of the method is that it does not lend itself to seasonal stratification.

Key words

auto-regressive moving-average model (ARIMA model) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Box, G. E. P. andJenkins, G. M. (1976),Time Series Analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day Inc. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. van den Dool, H. M. (1982),What do observations tell about long-range predictability? In: On the theory and application of simple climate models, to the problem of long range weather prediction: collected papers presented at Koninkligk Nederlands Meteorologisch Institut Workshop, De Bilt, 1–3, March 1981. De Bilt, Nederlands, R. Mureau, C. J. Kok, R. J. Haarsma, Eds.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, R. (1978),Predictability of Sea Level pressure anomalies over the North Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr.8, 233–246.Google Scholar
  4. Delleur, J. W. andKavvas, M. L. (1978),Stochastic models for monthly rainfall forecasting and synthetic generation. J. Appl. Meteor.17, 1528–1536.Google Scholar
  5. Harnack, R. P. andLandsberg, H. E. (1978),Winter season temperature outlook by objective methods. J. Geophys. Res.83, 3601–3616.Google Scholar
  6. Hasselmann, K. (1976),Stochastic climate models. Part I. Theory. Tellus 28, 473–485.Google Scholar
  7. Horel, J. D. (1983),Spatial persistence of the 500 mb height field during the winters from 1965–66 to 1981–82. Proceed. 8th Ann. Clim. Diag. Workshop, Oct. 17–21, NOAA.Google Scholar
  8. Leith, C. E. (1978),Predictability of Climate. Nature Climatological Supplement276, 352–355.Google Scholar
  9. Livezey, R. E. andJamison, S. W. (1977)A skill analysis of Soviet seasonal weather forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev.105, 1491–1500.Google Scholar
  10. Spar, J., Atlas, R. andKus, E. (1976),Monthly Mean Forecast experiment with the GISS model. Mon. Wea. Rev.104, 1215–1241.Google Scholar
  11. Spar, J. andLute, R. (1979),Simulations of the Monthly Mean Atmosphere for February 1976 with the GISS Model. Mon. Wea. Rev.107, 181–192.Google Scholar
  12. Steinberg, H. L. (1980),An application of the ARIMA procedure to climate diagnostics and forecasting. WMO Symp. Prob. Stat. Meth. in Wea. Forecasting. Nice. 287–294.Google Scholar
  13. Wahl, E. W. (1977),Preliminary results of a statistical long-range forecasting attempt. Mon. Wea. Rev.105, 529–535.Google Scholar
  14. Weare, B. C. (1979),Temperature statistics of short-term climatic change. Mon. Wea. Rev.107, 172–180.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard Steinberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Atmospheric Environment ServiceDownsview(Canada)

Personalised recommendations