Skip to main content
Log in

Infarct-related heart failure: The choice of ACE inhibitor does not matter

  • Post-Infarct Heart Failure: Section 3
  • Invited Editorial
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are effective across the whole spectrum of heart failure from mild to severe but there are little data on the use of ACE inhibitors specifically in patients with postinfarct heart failure. Pharmacological properties that might potentially be relevant to the choice of drug after myocardial infarction include differences in metabolism, possession of a sulphydryl group, tissue binding, duration of action, and side effect profile. Of these duration of action is probably the most important, as longer acting drugs generally cause more prolonged first-dose hypotension than shorter acting agents and first-dose hypotension is a particular concern in the early postinfarct period. In the SAVE study captopril was effective in reducing mortality and delaying the onset of symptomatic heart failure after myocardial infarction. Similarly, ramipril reduced mortality in the AIRE study. In contrast, enalapril was largely ineffective in CONSENSUS II. These differences result largely from study design and do not indicate an inherent superiority of captopril or ramipril over enalapril. Nonetheless, a short-acting agent should probably be used for the initial dose in postinfarct heart failure to minimize the risks of prolonged hypotension. This aside, the choice of agent is far less important than appropriate patient selection and appropriate maintenance dosages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril in survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive cardiac failure.N Engl J Med 1991;325:293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Consensus Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS).N Engl J Med 1987;316:1429–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure.N Engl J Med 1991;325:303–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The SOLVD investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions.N Engl J Med 1992;327:685–691.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McMurray J, Chopra M. Influence of ACE inhibitors on free radicals and reperfusion injury: Pharmacological curiosity or therapeutic hope?Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991;31:373–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herman AG. Differences in structure of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors might predict differences in action.Am J Cardiol 1992;70:102C-108C.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dzau VJ. Circulating versus local renin angiotensin system in cardiovascular homeostasis.Circulation 1988;77(Suppl 1):1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirklin PC, Dansby C, Laird CK, Willis PW. Discrepancy between first dose converting enzyme inhibition at rest and subsequent inhibition during exercise in chronic heart failure.Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988;43:616–622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giles TD, Katz R, Sullivan JM, et al. Short and long acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: A randomized trial of lisinopril versus captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure.J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:1240–1247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Packer M, Lee WH, Yushak M, Medina N. Comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients with severe chronic heart failure.N Engl J Med 1986;315:847–853.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bach R, Zardini P. Long acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition: Once daily lisinopril versus twice daily captopril in mild to moderate heart failure.Am J Cardiol 1992;70:70C-77C.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacFadyen RJ, Lees KR, Reid JL. Differences in first dose response to ACE inhibition in congestive cardiac failure: A placebo controlled study.Br Heart J 1991;66:206–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pouleur H, Rousseau MF, Ryden L. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and mortality in heart failure: Is enalapril better than captopril (abstr)?Circulation 1990;82(Suppl III):III675.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swedberg K, Held P, Kjekhus J, Rasmussen K, Ryden L, Wedel H. Effects of the early administration of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandanavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II).N Engl J Med 1992;327:678–684.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald WE, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med 1992;327:669–677.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The AIRE study investigators. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure.Lancet 1993;342:821–828.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ray, S., Dargie, H. Infarct-related heart failure: The choice of ACE inhibitor does not matter. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 8, 433–436 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877919

Key Words

Navigation