Skip to main content

A point of reference

Conclusion

83. It should now be apparent that the familiar problems of reference and modality can be satisfactorily resolved without either abandoning substitutivity of identity in modal contexts or invoking an intensional ontology. It might be argued, however, that the suggested resolution avoids invoking an intensional ontology only because the modal predicates, e.g. Nec and Believes, are left unanalysed. This may well be true but it should be appreciated that the analysis of modal predicates is an issue which is independent of both the problem of reference in modal contexts and the problem of the logical structure of propositions containing such contexts. These problems can be settled, as we have seen, without also settling how the modal predicates are to be analysed. Hence, if an intensional ontology is in the end required, it is required to analyse the modal predicates, not to solve the problems of reference and logical structure. This, we suggest, is an interesting and perhaps unexpected result.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Bibliography

  • Daniels, C., ‘Reference and Singular Referring Terms’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972), 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D., ‘On Saying That’, inWords and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine (eds. D. Davidson and J. Hintikka), Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K., ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’,Philosophical Review 75 (1966), 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G., ‘On Concept and Object’,Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (eds. P. T. Geach and M. Black), Blackwells, Oxford, 1952, pp. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G., ‘On Sense and Reference’,Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (eds. P. T. Geach and M. Black), Blackwells, Oxford, 1952, pp. 56–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D., ‘Quantifying In’,Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine (eds. D. Davidson and J. Hintikka), Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 206–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S., ‘Naming and Necessity’,Semantics of Natural Language (eds. G. Harman and D. Davidson), Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1972, pp. 253–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, B., ‘Pragmatics and Intensional Logic’,Synthese 22 (1970), 68–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V., ‘Reference and Modality’, inFrom a Logical Point of View, Harper & Row, New York, 1961, pp. 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V., ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’, inThe Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York, 1966, pp. 156–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V., ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, inThe Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York, 1966, pp. 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbin, J. W.,Mathematical Logic: A First Course, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.,Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.,Principles of Mathematics, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., ‘Advice on Modal Logic’,Philosophical Problems in Logic (ed. K. Lambert), Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.,Speeh Acts, The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R., ‘Pragmatics’,Synthese 22 (1970), 272–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F., ‘On Referring’,Mind (1950), 320–344.

  • van Fraassen, B. C.,Formal Semantics and Logic, The Macmillan Co., New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, B. A point of reference. Synthese 28, 361–454 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877581

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877581

Keywords

  • Unexpected Result
  • Logical Structure
  • Modal Context
  • Familiar Problem
  • Modal Predicate