Skip to main content
Log in

The vertical dimension of mental functioning

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A hierarchical, six-level model of human intelligence is described. The first four levels, which correspond to those found in Bernstein's theory of motor control, are concerned with palaeokinetic regulations (A), synergies (B), the spatial field (C), and object actions (D). The two levels of the higher symbolic coordinations embody conceptual structures (E) and metacognitive coordinations (F). The model is supported by experimental results from several subfields of cognitive research: e.g., different types of learning are specifically connected with the components of this hierarchical structure. Learning by the restructuring of existing knowledge proceeds by means of the metaprocedures of level F. The incremental accumulation of factual information is connected with the conceptual base of level E. Proceduralization of this knowledge results in the build-up of perceptual automatisms of skilled action (level D), as is often case in the formation of expert knowledge. Arguments for the hierarchical architecture of perception, attention, memory, understanding, thinking, and imagination are provided, and some parallels are drawn with the organization of emotional and motivational processes. It is argued that general, interdisciplinary questions on the nature and sources of mental functioning must be approached with a kind of pluralistic methodology. These questions cannot be answered in an equally general vein, because the localization of mental processes on the vertical dimension of cognitive architecture is to be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhutina, T. V., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Kempe, V. (1988). Semanticheskij sintaksis i orientatzija na porjadok slov v ontogeneze [The semantic syntax and orientation on the word order in ontogenesis]. In M. Shakhnorovich (Ed.),Semantika v rechevoj dejatel'nosti (pp. 5–19). Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuller, G. S. (1972).Tvorchestvo kak tochnaja nauka [Creativity as an exact science]. Moscow: Znanije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. (1990). Multiple levels of inquiry in cognitive sciencePsychological Research, 52, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zeev, A. (1990). Why did Psammenitus not pity his son?Analysis, 50, 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1896).Matière et mémoire. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. A. (1947).O postrojenii dviszenij (On the building of movements). Moscow: Medgiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. A. (1967).The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pegamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof-Köhler, D. (1989).Spiegelbild und Empathie. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J., Olver, R. P., & Greenfield, P. M. (1967).Studies in cognitive growth (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. N. (1984). Bereichsspezifisches Wissen und Metakognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.),Metakognition, Motivation, Lernen (pp. 211–232). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1985). Responding to indirect speech act. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. XI). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skills in amnesia.Science, 210, 207–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. J. M. (1943).The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. (1989). The recent excitement about neural networks.Nature, 337, 129–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1972).Vidy obobtchenij v obuchenii [Types of generalization in education]. Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1983).Lohhausen: Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W. (1989).System and metasystem in cognitive operations. Paper presented at the 3rd European Converence of Learning and Instruction, Madrid.

  • Dubois, D., & Weil-Barais, A. (1980). Activités anticipatrices dans une tâche de comparison de dessins et de phrases. In J. Regin (Ed.),Anticipation et comportement (pp. 445–454). Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertel, S. (1975). Gestaltpsychologische Denkmodelle für die Struktur der Sprache. In S. Ertel, L. Kemmler, & M. Stadler (Eds.),Gestalt-theorie in der modernen Psychologie (pp. 94–106). Darmstadt: Steinkopff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. (1984).Espaces mentaux. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive psychology: A critical analysis.Cognition, 28, 1–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foppa, K. (1990). Topical progression and intention. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.),The dynamics of dialogue.

  • Friederici, A. D. (1983). Children's sensitivity fo function words during sentence comprehension.Linguistics, 21, 717–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilinsky, A. (1983). Through the looking glass and what No Kohler found there. In L. Spillmann & B. R. Wooten (Eds.),Sensory experience, adaptation, and perception (pp. 3–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, H. (1920).Studies in neurology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1985).Wünschen — Wählen — Wollen. Vortrag gehalten bei der Eröffnung des Max-Planck-Instituts für psychologische Forschung, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, E. R., & Olivier, D. C. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, R. (1967). Dissociation of visual functions by deprivation and rearrangement.Psychologische Forschung, 31, 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, H. (1985).Die Welt der Begriffe. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, H. (1987). Semantic control of selective attention.Psychological Research, 49, 123–129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings-Jackson, H. (1959). In J. Taylor (Ed.),Selected writings of John Hugh lings-Jackson. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B. (1983). On generating procedures and structuring knowledge. In R. Groner, M. Groner, & W. R. Bischof (Eds.),Methods of heuristics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendorf, R. (1985).Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1973).Questions de poétique (2nd ed.). Paris: Édition du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janet, P. (1889)j.L' automatisme psychologique: essai de psychologie expérimentale sur les formes inferieures de l'activité humaine. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol, IX, pp. 153–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres): A computational approach.Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 63–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontjev, A. N. (1981).Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, W M., & James, J. (1977). James J. Gibson's strategy for perceiving. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 43–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbach, E. (1983). Toward a developmental study of imaginative processes.Archives de Psychologie, 51, 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. J. (1988). Phenomenal experience and functionalism. In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.),Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 121–158). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, D. (1987).Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, M., Ungerleiter, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways?Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1980). The limits of cognition. In P. M. Juscsyk & R. M. Klein (Eds.),On the nature of thought (pp. 12–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptual development (pp. 11–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specitication and the concept of perception.Psychological Research, 52, 207–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1972). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 283–308). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, K. (1978).Perception and representation. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, H., & Inhelder, B. (1972).La psychologie de l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, T. (1884).Les maladies de la mémoire. Paris: Altan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. H. (1973). On the internal strucutre of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moor (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueckl, J. G., Cave, K. R., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Why are “what” and “where” processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation.Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 1, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.),Semantic facotrs in cognition (pp. 37–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, S. (1977). On the possibility of “smart” perceptual mechanisms.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1966).An inquiry into meaning and truth. (orig. publ. in 1940). London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 501–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, E. (1989). Symbolverarbeitung und Konnektionismus: Eine Kontroverse ohne Ende? In B. Becker (Ed.),Zur Terminologie in der Kognitionsforschung. Arbeitspapiere der GMD 385.

  • Scribner S., & Cole, M. (1981).The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T. J., & Rosenberg, C. R. (1987). Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text.Complex Systems, 1, 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shcheglov, Y., & Zholkovsky, A. (1987).Poetics of expressiveness: A theory and applications. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shemjakin, F. N. (1959). Orientatzija v prostranstve [Spatial orientation]. In A. A. Smimov (Ed.),Psikhologicheskaja nauka v SSSR (Vol. l, pp. 140–192). Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, W. A., Thompson, R. F., & Nielson, D. R. (1966). Response decrement of flexion reflex in acute spinal cat and transient restoration by strong stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology, 29, 221–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum, P. (1967).Physiological psychology: Fundamental principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuber, H.-L. (1978). The brain and human behavior. In: R. W. Jung (Ed.),Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. VIII), Perception (pp. 879–920). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1967). Two visual systems in primates.Psychologische Forschung, 31, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1989). Memory: Performance, knowledge, and experience.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaihinger, H. (1911).Die Philosophie des Als Ob. Berlin: Reuther & Reithard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky, B. M. (1982). Visual cognition and its spatial-temporal context. In F. Klix, J. Hoffmann, & E. van der Meer (Eds.),Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 47–54). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky, B. M. (1988).Wissen und Handeln. Weinheim: VCH Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky, B. M. (1990).The functional organization of human intelligence (Report No. 21, Research Group on Mind and Brain). Bielefeld: Center for Interdisciplinary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velichkovsky, B. M., Blinnikova, J. V., & Lapin, E. A. (1986). Predstavlenije real' nogo i voobraszajemogo prostranstva [Representation of real and imaginary space].Voprosy Psikhologii, 31, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. (1972).Res cogitans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1985).Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. (1972). The context of plausible denial.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 4, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F. E. (1984). Metakognition und Motivation als Determinanten der Lerneffektivität. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Muwe (Eds.),Metakognition, Motivation und Lernen (pp. 9–22). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiskrantz, L. (1988). Some contributions of neurophysiology of vision and memory to the problem of consciosness. In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.),Consiciousness in contemporary science (pp. 183–199). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. (1939).Principles of development. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985).Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinchenko, V. P., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Vuchetich, G. G. (1980).Funktional'naja organizatija zrztel' noj pamjati [Functional organization of visual memory]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGU.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velichkovsky, B.M. The vertical dimension of mental functioning. Psychol. Res 52, 282–289 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877536

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877536

Keywords

Navigation