Summary
The models of science are representations of a part of reality. Every science has its own specific rules of constructing models, but there are many common rules that must be followed. These rules are to be part of what may be called a general theory of representation. This paper discusses some general aspects of representation that must be considered before such a general theory can be created. There are five sections: (1) an introduction to the topic of representation in general; (2) an overview of some general types of representation, such as goal-directed and self-organizational representations; (3) a short discussion of representation in some specific disciplines; (4) some formal aspects of representations; and (5) a discussion of epistemological aspects of representation, especially scientific reduction and mental causation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Block, N. (Ed.) (1981).Imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Churchman, C. W., & Ackoff, R. L. (1950). Purposive behaviour and cybernetics.Social Forces, 29, 32–39.
Dalenoort, G. J. (I979). Deterministic versus teleological explanation in general systems theory. Synopsis of a paper presented at the6th International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Hanover, FRG, August 22–29, 1979.
Dalenoort, G. J. (1985). Representations of cognitive systems.Cognitive Systems, 1, 3–16.
Dalenoort, G. J. (1987a). Development of concepts.Cognitive Systems, 2, 123–140.
Dalenoort, G. J. (1987b). Is physics reductionistic? In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, H. van Rappard, & A. W. Staats (Eds.),Current issues in theoretical psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dalenoort, G. J. (1989a). The paradigm of self-organization, studies of autonomous systems. In G. J. Dalenoort (Ed.),The paradigm of self organization (pp. 1–22). London: Gordon & Breach.
Dalenoort, G. J. (1989b). Mechanisms of self-organization. In G. J. Dalenoort (Ed.),The paradigm of self-organization (pp. 298–308). London: Gordon & Breach.
Dennett, D. C. (1971). Intentional systems.Journal of Philosophy, 68, 87–106. Repr. in D. C. Dennett (1978), Brainstorms (chapt. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). London: Academic Press.
Hebb, D. O. (1949).The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
Hume, D. (1777).Enquiries concerning human understanding and concerning the principles of morals. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed., 1975, repr. 1978, 3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lashley, K. S. (1951). In search of the engram.Symposia of the Society of Experimental Biology, 4, 454–482.
Mackie, J. L. (1974).The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nagel, E. (1961).The structure of science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pascal, B. (1670).Penséées. J. Chevalier (Ed.) (1962). Paris: Le Livre de Poche.
Révész, G. (1946).Ursprung und Vorgeschichte der Sprache. Bern: Francke.
Rosen, R. (1978).Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems. New York: North-Holland.
Singer, E. A. (1959).Experience and reflection. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wundt, W. (1911).Grundriss der Psychologie (10th ed.). Leipzig: Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper was written during participation in the Research Project “Mind and Brain,” at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielefeld, BRD.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalenoort, G.J. Towards a general theory of representation. Psychol. Res 52, 229–237 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877531
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877531