Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been considerable debate as to whether the revenue-neutral substitution of environmental taxes for ordinary income taxes might offer a double dividend: not only (1) improve the environment but also (2) reduce certain costs of the tax system. This paper articulates different notions of double dividend and examines the theoretical and empirical evidence for each. It also connects the double-dividend issue with principles of optimal environmental taxation in a second-best setting.

A weak double-dividend claim-that returning tax revenues through cuts in distortionary taxes leads to cost savings relative to the case where revenues are returned lump sum-is easily defended on theoretical grounds and (thankfully) receives wide support from numerical simulations. The stronger versions contend that revenueneutral swaps of environmental taxes for ordinary distortionary taxes involve zero or negative gross costs. Theoretical analyses and numerical results tend to cast doubt on the strong double-dividend claim, although the theoretical case is not air-tight and the numerical evidence is mixed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, Anthony B., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. (1980).Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, Alan J., and Laurence J. Kotlikoff. (1987).Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, Charles L., and Don Fullerton. (1992). “Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(3), 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, Charles L., and Steven G. Medema. (1993). “The Marginal Efficiency Effects of Taxes and Subsidies in the Presence of Externalities.”Journal of Public Economics 52, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, Charles L., John B. Shoven, and John Whalley. (1985). “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the U.S.”American Economic Review 75(1), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, T.J., and J. Vanek. (1971). “The Theory of Tariffs, Taxes, and Subsidies: Some Aspects of the Second Best.”American Economic Review 61, 925–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1992). “Environmental Taxation and Labor Market Distortions,” Working Paper, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, March. Forthcoming inEuropean Journal of Political Economy.

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1994a). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation.”American Economic Review, September, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 1085–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. (1994b). “Environmental Tax Reform and Endogenous Growth.” Working Paper, Tilburg University.

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Lawrence H. Goulder. (1994a). “Inegrating Environmental and Distortionary Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses.” Working Paper, Stanford University, March.

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Lawrence H. Goulder. (1994b). “Optimal Environmental Taxataion in the Presence of Other Taxes: An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” Working Paper, Stanford University, May.

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and F. van der Ploeg. (1993). “Consequences of Environmental Tax Reform for Involuntary Unemployment and Welfare.” Working Paper, Tilburg University, September.

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and F. van der Ploeg. (1994a). “Environmental Policy, Public Finance and the Labor Market in a Second-Best World.”Journal of Public Economics 55, 349–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. Lans, and F. van der Ploeg. (1994b). “Green Policies in a Small Open Economy.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics 96(3), 343–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendemoen, Anne, and Haakon Vennemo. (1993). “The Marginal Cost of Funds in the Presence of External Effects.” Discussion Paper No. 99, Research Department, Central Bureau of Statistics, Norway, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, Carlo, Marzio Geleotti, and Massimo Gallo. (1994). “Environmental Taxation and Unemployment: Some Evidence on the Double Dividend Hypothesis in Europe.” Working Paper, GRETA Econometrics, May.

  • Dasgupta, Partha S., and Geoffrey M. Heal. (1979).Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus. (1987). “Econometric Issues for Tax Design in Developing Countries.” In David Newbery and Nicholas Stern, (eds.),The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Peter, and J. Mirrlees. (1971). “Optimal Taxation and Public Production I: Production Efficiency and II: Tax Rules.”American Economic Review 61.

  • Dixit, Avinash. (1975). “Welfare Effects of Tax and Price Changes.”Journal of Public Economics 4(1), 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, Darius, and John Weyant. (1995).Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, Lawrence H. (1994a). “Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis.” Working Paper, Stanford University, July. Forthcoming inJournal of Environmental Economics and Management.

  • Goulder, Lawrence H. (1994b). “Energy Taxes: Traditional Efficiency Effects and Environmental Implications.” In James M. Poterba, (ed.),Tax Policy and the Economy 8. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Jerry A. (1985). “Taxes and Labor Supply.” In A.J. Auerbach and Martin S. Feldstein (eds.),Handbook of Public Economics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, Dale W., and Peter J. Wilcoxen. (1990). “Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth.”Rand Journal of Economics 21(2), 314–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, Dale W., and Peter J. Wilcoxen. (1995). “Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions: An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment.” In Darius Gaskins and John Weyant (eds.),Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, Dale W., and Kun-Young Yun. (1990).Tax Policy and the Cost of Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, Allen V., and Blair T. Bower. (1968).Managing Witter Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Dwight, R., and Walter S. Misiolek. (1986). “Substituting Pollution Taxation for General-Taxation: Some Implications for Efficiency in Pollution Taxation.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 338–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligthart, Jenny E., and Frederick van der Ploeg. (1994). “Pollution, the Cost of Public Funds and Endogenous Growth.” Working Paper, University of Amsterdam, October. Forthcoming inEconomic Letters.

  • Lipsey, R.G., and K. Lancaster. (1956). “The General Theory of the Second Best.”Review of Economic Studies 24, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Albert L. (1984).Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, William D. (1993). “Optimal Greenhouse-Gas Reductions and Tax Policy in the ‘DICE’ Model.”American Economic Review 83(2) (Papers and Proceedings), 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Wallace E. (1991). “Pollution Charges as a Source of Public Revenues.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper QE92-05. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, November.

  • OECD. (1992).The Economic Costs of Reducing CO 2 Emissions. OECD Economic Studies 19. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Ian W.H. (1994). “Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling.” Working Paper, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, April.

  • Pearce, David W. (1991). “The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjuting to Global Warming.”Economic Journal 101, 938–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey, John. (1992). “Some Interactions between Environmental Policy and Public Finance.” Working Paper, University of Bristol, June.

  • Pigou, A.C. (1938).The Economics of Welfare (4th ed.). London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, James M. (1991). “Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax.” In Rudiger Dornbusch and James M. Poterba, (eds.),Global Warming Economic Policy Responses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, James M. (1993). “Global Warming: A Public Finance Perspective.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proost, Stef, and Denise van Regemorter. (1994). “Testing the Double Dividend Hypothesis for a Carbon Tax in a Small Open Economy.” Working Paper, Center for Economic Studies, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, Robert, Roger C. Dower, Robin Jenkins, and Jacqueline Geoghegan. (1992).Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy. World Resources Institute, November, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, Agnar. (1975). “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.”Swedish Journal of Economics 77, pp. 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöb, Ronnie. (1994). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: Environmental View vs. Public Finance View.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Munich, June.

  • Shackleton, Robert, Michael Shelby, Alex Cristofero, Roger Brinner, Joyce Yanchar, Lawrence Goulder, Dale Jorgenson, Peter Wilcoxen, and Peter Pauly. (1992). “The Efficiency Value of Carbon Tax Revenues.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November, draft manuscript.

  • Shah, Anar, and Bjorn Larsen. (1992). “Carbon Taxes, the Greenhouse Effect and Developing Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 957. World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sörenson, Peter B., Lars H. Pedersen, and Soren B. Nielsen. (1994). “Taxation, Pollution, Unemployment and Growth: Could There Be a Triple Dividend from a Green Tax Reform?” Working Paper, Economic Policy Research Unit, Copenhagen Business School.

  • Sweeney, James L. (1977). “Economics of Depletable Resources: Market Forces and Intertemporal Bias.”Review of Economic Studies 44, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, James L. (1993). “Economic Theory of Depletable Resources: An Introduction.” In Allen V. Kneese and James L. Sweeney, (eds.),Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics (Vol. 3). New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkla, David. (1984). “The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon. (1967). “Excess Benefit.”Water Resources Research 3, 643–644.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Landau Economics Building, Stanford University, 94305-6072, Stanford, CA, USA

    Lawrence H. Goulder

Authors
  1. Lawrence H. Goulder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goulder, L.H. Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide. Int Tax Public Finan 2, 157–183 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495

Key words

Search

Navigation