Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 123, Issue 6, pp 805–818 | Cite as

The fractal nature of the inhomogeneities in the lithosphere evidenced from seismic wave scattering

  • Ru-Shan Wu
  • Keiiti Aki
Article

Abstract

In this paper we show evidences of the fractal nature of the 3-D inhomogeneities in the lithosphere from the study of seismic wave scattering and discuss the relation between the fractal dimension of the 3-D inhomogeneities and that of the fault surfaces. Two methods are introduced to measure the inhomogeneity spectrum of a random medium: 1. the coda excitation spectrum method, and 2. the method of measuring the frequency dependence of scattering attenuation. The fractal dimension can be obtained from the inhomogeneity spectrum of the medium. The coda excitation method is applied to the Hindu-Kush data. Based on the observed coda excitation spectra (for frequencies 1–25 Hz) and the past observations on the frequency dependence of scattering attenuation, we infer that the lithospheric inhomogeneities are multiple scaled and can be modeled as a bandlimited fractal random medium (BLFRM) with an outer scale of about 1 km. The fractal dimension of the 3-D inhomogeneities isD3=31/2–32/3, which corresponds to a scaling exponent (Hurst number)H=1/2–1/3. The corresponding 1-D inhomogeneity spectra obey the power law with a powerp=2H+1=2–5/3. The intersection between the earth surface and the isostrength surface of the 3-D inhomogeneities will have fractal dimensionD1=1.5–1.67. If we consider the earthquake fault surface as developed from the isosurface of the 3-D inhomogeneities and smoothed by the rupture dynamics, the fractal dimension of the fault trace on the surface must be smaller thanD1, in agreement with recent measurements of fractal dimension along the San Andreas fault.

Key words

Fractal wave scattering seismic coda wave lithospheric inhomogeneities earthquake faults 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki, K. (1973),Scattering of P Waves under the Montana Lasa. J. Geophys. Res.,78, 1334–1346.Google Scholar
  2. Aki, K. (1980),Scattering and attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res.,85, 6496–6504.Google Scholar
  3. Aki, K. (1981),Source and scattering effects on the spectra of small local earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,71, 1687–1700.Google Scholar
  4. Aki, K. (1983),Theory of earthquake prediction with special reference to monitoring of the quality factor of lithosphere by the coda method, Earthq. Predict.3, 219–230.Google Scholar
  5. Aki, K. (1985),Theory of earthquake prediction with special reference to monitoring of the quality factor of lithosphere by the coda method, Earthq. Predict. Res.,3, 219–230.Google Scholar
  6. Aki, K. andChouet, A. B. (1975),Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation and scattering effects. J. Geophys. res.,80, 3322–3342.Google Scholar
  7. Aviles, C. A. andSholz, C. H. (1985),Fractal Analysis of characteristic fault segments of the San Andreas fault system, EOS,66, 314.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, M. V. (1979), Diffractals.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 12, 781–797.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, M. V. andBlackwell, T. M. (1981),Diffractal echoes, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.,14, 3101–3110.Google Scholar
  10. Berteussen, K. A., Christoffersson, A., Husebye, E. S. andDahle, A. (1975),Wave scattering theory in analysis of P wave anomalies at NORSAR and LASA. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.,42, 403–417.Google Scholar
  11. Capon, J. (1974),Characterization of crust and upper mantle structure under Lasa as a random medium. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.,64, 235–266.Google Scholar
  12. Flatte, S. M. andWu, R. S. (1985),Weak transmission fluctuations of seismic P-waves caused by the lithosphere modelled as a random medium. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  13. King, G. (1983), The accommodation of large strains in the upper lithosphere of the earth and other solids by self-similar fault systems: the geometrical origin of b-value,PAGEOPH, 121, 761–815.Google Scholar
  14. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977),Fractals, form, chance, and dimensions. W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Okubo, P. andAki, K. (1983),Fractal geometry in the San Andreas fault system, EOS,64, 766.Google Scholar
  16. Roecker, S. W., Tucker, B., King, J. andHatzfeld, D. (1982),Estimates of Q in Central Asia as function of frequency and depth using the coda of locally recorded earthquakes, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.,72, 129–149.Google Scholar
  17. Sato, H. (1982a),Amplitude attenuation of impulsive waves in random media based on travel time corrected mean wave formalism. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.,71, 559–564.Google Scholar
  18. Sato, H. (1982b),Attenuation of S waves in the lithosphere due to scattering by its random velocity structure. J. Geophys. Res.,87, 7779–7785.Google Scholar
  19. Scholz, C. H. andAviles, C. (1985),Fractal dimension of the 1906 San Andreas fault and 1915 Pleasant Valley faults. (Abstract),Earthquakes Notes, 56, 20.Google Scholar
  20. Tatarskii, V. I. (1961),Wave propagation in a turbulent medium. Dover.Google Scholar
  21. Tatarskii, V. I. (1971),The effects of the turbulent atmosphere on wave propagation.Google Scholar
  22. Wu, R. S. (1982a),Attenuation of short period seismic waves due to scattering, Geophys. Res. Lett.,9, 9–12.Google Scholar
  23. Wu, R. S. (1984), Seismic wave scattering and small scale inhomogeneities in the lithosphere. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Earth, Atmospheric, and Planet, Sci., Mass. Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  24. Wu, R. S. andAki, K. (1985a),Scattering characteristics of elastic waves by an elastic heterogeneity. Geophysics,50, 582–595.Google Scholar
  25. Wu, R. S. andAki, K. (1985b),Elastic wave scattering by a random medium and the small scale inhomogeneities in the lithospace, J. Geophys. Res.,90, 10261–10273.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ru-Shan Wu
    • 1
  • Keiiti Aki
    • 2
  1. 1.Earth Resource Laboratory, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary SciencesMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyMassachusettsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations