Skip to main content
Log in

Ambiguity in the electromagnetic interpretation due to a conducting halo surrounding the target

  • Published:
pure and applied geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Using the electromagnetic response of a two-layer spherical model it is shown that the estimate of the depth, radius, conductivity and magnetic contrast of a spherical conductor through the multifrequency or multi-time measurements is dependent upon the electrical and geometrical parameters of the conducting halo surrounding the target. The results identify the corrections or ambiguity in the interpretation depending upon whether some knowledge about the halo is available or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. R. Wait,A conducting sphere in a time-varying magnetic field, Geophysics16 (1951), 666.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. H. Ward,Unique determination of conductivity, susceptibility, size and depth in multifrequency electromagnetic exploration, Geophysics24 (1959), 531.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. H. Ward,Foreword and introduction, Geophysics36 (1971), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. G. Negi,Electromagnetic screening due to a disseminated spherical zone over a conducting sphere, Geophysics32 (1967), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. R. Wait,Electromagnetic induction in a solid conducting sphere enclosed by a thin conducting spherical shell, Geophysics34 (1969), 753.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Roy,On the effect of overburden on electromagnetic anomalies, A review, Geophysics34 (1970), 646.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Lowrie andG. F. West,The effect of a conducting overburden on electromagnetic prospecting measurements, Geophysics30 (1965), 624.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. K. Gaur et al., Enhancement of electromagnetic anomaly by conducting overburden (EAEG Meeting, Hanover. 1971).

  9. D. S. Parasnis,Analysis of some multifrequency, multiseparation electromagnetic surveys, Geophys. Prospecting29 (1971), 163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U. Raval andK. N. N. Rao,Quasi-stationary electromagnetic response of covered permeable conductors to some pulses of spatially uniform magnetic field (Communicated to ‘Pure and Applied Geophysics’).

  11. J. R. Wait andK. P. Spies,Quasi-static response of a conducting permeable sphere, Geophysics34 (1969), 789

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. H. Ward,The electromagnetic response of a magnetic iron ore deposit, Geophys. Prospecting9 (1961), 191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad-7, A.P., India.-NGRI Contribution No. 72–364.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raval, U. Ambiguity in the electromagnetic interpretation due to a conducting halo surrounding the target. PAGEOPH 104, 574–581 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00875902

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00875902

Keywords

Navigation