Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 139–145 | Cite as

On the role of Brownian motion in the control of detrital remanent magnetization of sediments

  • Frank D. Stacey
Article

Summary

The field dependence of magnetic remanence in laboratory deposited sediments is re-examined in terms of the average orientation of small grains of magnetite subject to the combined effect of an aligning field and thermal agitation. The classical (Langevin) formula for paramagnetic susceptibility is generalized to describe an assembly of grains with magnetic moments having a uniform distribution of values between zero and an upper limit, yielding a simple analytical expression in excellent accord with the pioneering measurements of Johnson, Murphy and Torreson. Comparison of theory and observation shows that the grain moments are intermediate between the values expected for single domains and multidomains, confirming the existence of pseudo-single domain effects, as deduced from observations of thermoremanence.

Keywords

Magnetite Combine Effect Uniform Distribution Brownian Motion Magnetic Remanence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T. Nagata,Notes on detrital magnetization of sediments, J. Geomag. Geoelect.,14, (1962), 99.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    F. D. Stacey,The physical theory of rock magnetism, Advances in Physics12, (1963), 45.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. W. Collinson,Depositional remanent magnetization in sediments, J. Geophys. Res.70 (1965), 4663.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. B. Nozharov,On the theory of depositional remanent magnetization in sediments: influence of Brownian motion of rotation upon the magnetic orientation of sediments Pure and Appl. Geophys.67, (1967/II), 123.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. F. King andA. I. Rees Detrital magnetism in sediments: an examination of some theoretical models, J. Geophys. Res.71 (1966), 561.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. A. Johnson, T. Murphy, andO. W. Torreson,Pre-history of the earth's magnetic field, Terr. Mag. Atm. Elect.53, (1948), 349.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    L. G. Parry,Magnetic properties of dispersed magnetite powders, Phil Mag.11 (1965), 303.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. O. Dickson, C. W. F. Everitt, L. G. Parry andF. D. Stacey,The origin of thermoremanent magnetization, Earth Plan. Sci. Letters1 (1966), 222.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. D. Stacey,The Koenigsberger ratio and the nature of thermoremanence in igneous rocks, Earth Plan. Sci. Letters2 (1967), 67.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. N. Khramov,Orientational magnetization of finely dispersed sediments Phys. Solid Earth, No. 1, (1968), 63.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Irving andA. Major,Post-depositional detrital remanent magnetization in a synthetic sediment, Sedimentology3 (1964), 135.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. H. Griffiths, R. F. King, A. I. Rees andA. E. Wright,The remanent magnetism of some recent varved sediments, Proc. Roy. Soc.A256 (1960), 359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank D. Stacey
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations