Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 122, Issue 2–4, pp 447–462 | Cite as

Effects of pore fluid chemistry on stable sliding of Berea sandstone

  • J. D. Dunning
  • M. E. Miller
Article

Abstract

Single-cycle and multiple-cycle frictional-sliding experiments were employed to evaluate the effects of pore fluid environments on yield strength, frictional-sliding dynamics, and gouge production and morphology. Circular right cylinders cored from Berea sandstone sawcut at 35° to the axes were saturated in water, an inorganic brine, and various anionic, cationic, and nonionic aqueous surface-active agents. Samples were deformed under an effective confining pressure of 50 MPa and an axial strain rate of 6×10−5 sec−1 until a 2% axial strain beyond yield (defined as the onset of sliding) was achieved. All samples were displaced by stable sliding. In the single-cycle tests the unsaturated and water-saturated samples displayed small stress peaks at yield. During stable sliding samples saturated with DTAB and SDS displayed slight increases in differential stress and statistically significant higher frictional coefficients than other environments (including water) but were very similar in behavior to dry, unsaturated samples. In the multiple-cycle tests, samples were loaded to 2% strain beyond yield and unloaded to a differential stress of approximately 5–10 MPa a total of four times. These results further suggest that DTAB exerts a ‘strengthening’ effect on the sandstone relative to water which, to a limiting value, increased with displacement. The DTAB and SDS environments also produced a coarser grain-size distribution in the gouge relative to gouge produced in the other environments. Investigation of the gouge by scanning electron microscope revealed that these larger ‘grains’ were composed of dense, apparently cemented aggregates of ultrafine, platy quartz particles.

Key words

Pore fluid chemistry Stable sliding Fault gouge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, B. (1984),Subcritical Crack Growth in Geologic Materials. Presented at U.S.G.S. Conference on the Role of Water in Crustal Deformation, Carmel, CA, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  2. Aydn, A. (1983), Personal communication about work done in the Sierra Nevadas for the U.S.G.S.Google Scholar
  3. Boozer, G., Hiller, K., andSerdengecti, S. (1963),Effects of Pore Fluid on the Deformational Behavior of Rocks Subject to Triaxial Compression, Proc. Rock Mech. Symp. 5th.Google Scholar
  4. Brace, W., andByerlee, J. (1970),Stick-slip as a Mechanism for Earthquakes, Science153, 990.Google Scholar
  5. Brace, W., andMartin, R. (1968),A Test of the Law of Effective Stress, Int. J. Rock Mech. Bull.5, 415–426.Google Scholar
  6. Dieterich, J. (1979),Modeling of Rock Friction, Parts I and II, J. Geophys. Res.84, 2161–2175.Google Scholar
  7. Dieterich, J. (1984),Control of Time and Velocity-Dependent Friction in Rocks by Adsorbed Water. Presented at U.S.G.S. Conferene on the Role of Water in Crustal Deformation, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  8. Dunning, J., andMiller, M. (1983),The Effect of Pore Fluid Chemistry on Stick-Slip/Stable Sliding in Sandstone, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, EOS64 (45), 863.Google Scholar
  9. Dunning, J., Petrovski, D., Schuyler, J., andOwens, A. (1984),Effects of Aqueous Chemical Environments on Crack Propagation in Quartz. Presented at U.S.G.S. Conference on the Role of Water in Crustal Deformation, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  10. Engelder, T., Logan, T., andHandin, J. (1975),The Sliding Characteristics of Sandstone on Quartz Fault Gouge, Pure Appl. Geophys.113, 69–86.Google Scholar
  11. Enustun, B., andTurkevich, J. (1960),Solubility of Fine Particles of Strontium Sulfate, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.84, 4502–4509.Google Scholar
  12. Freiman, S. (1984),Effects of Chemical Environments on Slow Crack Growth. Presented at U.S.G.S. Conference on the Role of Water in Crustal Deformation, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  13. Fuerstenau, D. (1970),Interfacial Processes in Mineral/Water Systems, Pure Appl. Chem.24, 135–164.Google Scholar
  14. Gibbs, J.,The Collected Works of J. W. Gibbs, Vol.1 (Yale University Press, New Haven 1984).Google Scholar
  15. Healy, J., Rubey, W., Griggs, E., andRaleigh, C. (1968),The Denver Earthquake, Science161, 1301–1310.Google Scholar
  16. Higgs, N. (1981),Mechanical Properties of Ultrafine Quartz, Chlorite, Bentonite in Environments of the Upper Crust. Ph.D. dissertation, 267 pp., Texas A & M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  17. Logan, J., Higgs, N., andFriedman, M. (1981),Laboratory Studies on Natural Fault Gouge From the Dry Lake Valley No. 1 Well, Amer. Geophys. Union, Monograph 24, pp. 121–134.Google Scholar
  18. Logan, J., andBlackwell, M. (1983),The Influence of Chemically-Active Fluids on the Frictional Properties of Sandstones, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, EOS64 (45), 835.Google Scholar
  19. Noll, L. (1983), Personal communication: DOE Bartlesville OK BETC.Google Scholar
  20. O'Connor, D., andSanders, J. (1956),Hydrophobic Monolayers on Platinum, Mica, and Silica, J. Colloid Sci.11, 158–166.Google Scholar
  21. Pollard, D. (1983), Personal communication about work done in the Sierra Nevadas for the U.S.G.S.Google Scholar
  22. Ruina, A. (1980),Friction Laws and Instabilities. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University, 99 pp., Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  23. Schuyler, J. (1982),An Investigation of the Effects of Aqueous Chemical Environments on Hydraulic Fracture Morphology. M.S. thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  24. Schulyer, J., Owens, A., andDunning, J. (1981),The Role of Surface Energy in Chemical Weakening, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, EOS62 (45), 321.Google Scholar
  25. Silien, L., andMartell, A. (1964),Stability Constants of Metal Ion Complexes, The Chemical Society, 40, London.Google Scholar
  26. Swolfs, H. (1971),Chemical Effects of Pore Fluids on Rock Properties. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  27. Teufel, L., andLogan, J. (1978),Effect of Displacement Rate on the Real Contact Area and Temperature Generated During Frictional Sliding of Tennessee Sandstone, Pure Appl. Geophys.116, 840–865.Google Scholar
  28. Ter-Minassian Seraga, L. (1963),Chemisorption and Dewetting of Glass and Silica. InContact Angle Wettability and Adhesion, Adv. in Chem. Series, No. 43, pp. 232–249.Google Scholar
  29. Tullis, T., Personal communication, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. Tullis, T., andWeeks, J. (1983),Inverse Dependence of Frictional resistance on Sliding Velocity at Elevated Normal Stress, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, EOS64 (45), 850.Google Scholar
  31. Weeks, J., Tullis, T., andBechtel, T. (1983),Nonlinear Instability Effects in Rock Friction, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, EOS64 (45), 850.Google Scholar
  32. Westwood, A. (1974),Control and Application of Environment Sensitive Fracture Processes, J. Mat. Sci.9, 1871–1894.Google Scholar
  33. Wiederhorn, S., andJohnson, H. (1972),Effect ofElectrolyte pH on Crack Propagation in Glass, J. Amer. Cer. Soc.56, 192–198.Google Scholar
  34. Zoback, M., Tsukahara, H., andHickman, S. (1980),Stress Measurements at Depth in the Vicinity of the San Andreas Fault, J. Geophys. Res.85, 1657–1673.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Dunning
    • 1
  • M. E. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations