Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 132, Issue 1–2, pp 401–415 | Cite as

Complex rays applied to wave propagation in a viscoelastic medium

  • D. J. Hearn
  • E. S. Krebes
Article

Abstract

In order to trace a ray between known source and receiver locations in a perfectly elastic medium, the take-off angle must be determined, or equialently, the ray parameter. In a viscoelastic medium, the initial value of a second angle, the attenuation angle (the angle between the normal to the plane wavefront and the direction of maximum attenuation), must also be determined. There seems to be no agreement in the literature as to how this should be done. In computing anelastic synthetic seismograms, some authors have simply chosen arbitrary numerical values for the initial attenuation angle, resulting in different raypaths for different choices. There exists, however, a procedure in which the arbitrariness is not present, i.e., in which the raypath is uniquely determined. It consists of computing the value of the anelastic ray parameter for which the phase function is stationary (Fermat's principle). This unique value of the ray parameter gives unique values for the take-off and attenuation angles. The coordinates of points on these stationary raypaths are complex numbers. Such rays are known as complex rays. They have been used to study electromagnetic wave propagation in lossy media. However, ray-synthetic seismograms can be computed by this procedure without concern for the details of complex raypath coordinates. To clarify the nature of complex rays, we study two examples involving a ray passing through a vertically inhomogeneous medium. In the first example, the medium consists of a sequence of discrete homogeneous layers. We find that the coordinates of points on the ray are generally complex (other than the source and receiver points which are usually assumed to lie in real space), except for a ray which is symmetric about an axis down its center, in which case the center point of the ray lies in real space. In the second example, the velocity varies continuously and linearly with depth. We show that, in geneneral, the turning point of the ray lies in complex space (unlike the symmetric ray in the discrete layer case), except if the ratio of the velocity gradient to the complex frequency-dependent velocity at the surface is a real number. We also present a numerical example which demonstrates that the differences between parameters, such as arrival time and raypath angles, for the stationary ray and for rays computed by the above-mentioned arbitrary approaches can be substantial.

Key words

Complex rays viscoelastic waves anelasticity attenuation Fermat's principle synthetic seismograms ray tracing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki, K., andRichards, P. G.,Quantitative Seismology, vol. I (W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco 1980).Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, J. A. (1974),Complex Rays for Radio Waves in an Absorbing Ionosphere, Proc. I. E. E. E.62, 1577–1585.Google Scholar
  3. Bertoni, H. L., Felsen, L. B., andHessel, A. (1971),Local Properties of Radiation in Lossy Media, I. E. E. E. Trans. Antennas Propagat.AP-19, 226–237.Google Scholar
  4. Borcherdt, R. D. (1977),Reflection and Refraction of Type-II S Waves in Elastic and Anelastic Media, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.67, 43–67.Google Scholar
  5. Borcherdt, R. D. (1982),Reflection-refraction of General P-and Type-I S-waves in Elastic and Anelastic Solids, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.70, 621–638.Google Scholar
  6. Borcherdt, R. D., Glassmoyer, G., andWennerberg, L. (1986),Influence of Welded Boundaries in Anelastic Media on Energy Flow, and Characteristics of P, S-I, and S-II Waves: Observational Evidence for Inhomogeneous Body Waves in Low-loss Solids, J. Geophys. Res.91, 11503–11518.Google Scholar
  7. Bourbié, T., andGonzalez-Serrano, A. (1983),Synthetic Seismograms in Attenuating Media, Geophysics48, 1575–1587.Google Scholar
  8. Buchen, P. W. (1971),Reflection, Transmission and Diffraction of SH-waves in Linear Viscoelastic Solids, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.25, 97–113.Google Scholar
  9. Budden, K. G., andTerry, P. D. (1971),Radio Ray Tracing in Complex Space, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A321, 275–301.Google Scholar
  10. Censor, D. (1977),Fermat's Principle and Real Space-time Rays in Absorbing Media, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.10, 1781–1790.Google Scholar
  11. Červený, V., andRavindra, R.,Theory of Seismic Head Waves (University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1971).Google Scholar
  12. Červený, V., Molotkov, I. A., andPšenčik, I.,Ray Method in Seismology (Charles University, Prague 1977).Google Scholar
  13. Connor, K. A., andFelsen, L. B. (1974),Complex Space-time Rays and their Application to Pulse Propagation in Lossy Dispersive Media, Proc. I. E. E. E.62, 1586–1598.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, P. S. (1930),Geometrical Optics in Absorbing Media, Proc. N. A. S.16, 37–45.Google Scholar
  15. Felsen, L. B. (1984),Geometrical Theory of Diffraction, Evanescent Waves, Complex Rays and Gaussian Beams, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.79, 77–88.Google Scholar
  16. Grant, F. S., andWest, G. F.,Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics (McGraw-Hill, New York 1965).Google Scholar
  17. Hamming, R. W.,Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York 1973, second edition).Google Scholar
  18. Hearn, D. J.,Rays and Waveforms in Anelastic Media (Ph. D. thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada 1985).Google Scholar
  19. Jones, R. M. (1970),Ray Theory for Lossy Media, Radio Science5, 793–801.Google Scholar
  20. Kelamis, P. G., Kanasewich, E. R., andAbramovici, F. (1983),Attenuation of Seismograms Obtained by the Cagniard-Pekeris Method, Geophysics48, 1204–1211.Google Scholar
  21. Krebes, E. S. (1984),On the Reflection and Transmission of Viscoelastic Waves—Some Numerical Results, Geophysics49, 1374–1380.Google Scholar
  22. Krebes, E. S., andHearn, D. J. (1985),On the Geometrical Spreading of Viscoelastic Waves, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.75, 391–396.Google Scholar
  23. Krebes, E. S., andHron, F. (1980),Synthetic Seismograms for SH Waves in a Layered Anelastic Medium by Asymptotic Ray Theory, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.70, 2005–2020.Google Scholar
  24. Richards, P. G. (1984),On Wavefronts and Interfaces in Anelastic Media, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.74, 2157–2165.Google Scholar
  25. Rönnmark, K. (1984),Ray Tracing in Dissipative Media, Annales Geophysicae2, 57–60.Google Scholar
  26. Suchy, K. (1972),Ray Tracing in an Anisotropic Absorbing Medium, J. Plasma. Phys.8, 53–65.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, W-Y. D., andDeschamps, G. A. (1974),Application of Complex Ray Tracing to Scattering Problems, Proc. I. E. E. E.62, 1541–1551.Google Scholar
  28. Wennerberg, L., andGlassmoyer, G. (1986),Absorption Effects on Plane Waves in Layered Media, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.76, 1407–1432.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Hearn
    • 1
  • E. S. Krebes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations