Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 132, Issue 1–2, pp 269–288 | Cite as

The complexity of the crust from refraction/wide-angle reflection data

  • R. F. Mereu
Article

Abstract

ThePmP wide-angle reflected signal from the Moho shows a wide variation in its characteristics when cornpared from region to region. If the earth's crust is simple and homogeneous and the Moho is a sharp discontinuity, supercriticalPmP wavelets are large and isolated in the 100 km to 300 km distance range when compared to the preceding signals on the seismic traces. If the crust itself has numerous short reflectors and the Moho transition zone is thick or badly disrupted from past tectonic disturbances, thenPmP is often poorly defined and difficult to identify in the coda of earlier arriving signals. These signals are poorly correlated because the reflectors themselves are in general not only discontinuous but tend to be distributed at various depths within the crust. The effect of the vertical velocity gradient in the crust is to make the reflective field for downgoing waves much greater than for upgoing waves. The large variations in reflection coefficients wiht angle of incidence has the effect of making the coda generated by a reflective machanism distance dependent. The reflected signals are also contaminated with scattered signals from smaller scale heterogeneities which may be distributed more uniformly within the crust.

In conventional seismic inversion methods applied to crustal refraction experiments, emphasis is usually placed on obtaining a velocity model of the subsurface structure. These models are relatively simple and are limited in the amount of complexity which can be uniquely inferred from the data. The main problem arises because of the difficulties in the identification of the origin of the signals which are themselves often incoherent from trace to trace.

In this paper it is shown how the conventional record section may be complemented with a normal moveout corrected intensity section which emphasizes areas of large signal complexities. Data from this intensity section is then used as input to obtain a quantitative measurement of a complexity parameter. These measurements may be used to infer or compare differences in crustal heterogeneity from one region to another. The discussion is illustrated with both numerical modeling data as well as data from recent crustal experiments which were conducted over the Canadian Shield.

Key words

Complexity scattering crust refraction wide-angle reflection coda 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki, K., andChouet, B. (1975),Origin of Coda Waves: Source, Attenuation, and Scattering Effects, J. Geophys. Res.80, 3322–3342.Google Scholar
  2. Braille, L. W., andSmith, R. B. (1975),Guide to the Interpretation of Crustal Refraction Profiles, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.40, 145–176.Google Scholar
  3. Braille, L. W., andChiang C. S.,The continental Mohorovicic discontinuity: Results from near-vertical and wide-angle reflection studies, InReflection Seismology: A Global Prespective (eds. L. Brown and M. Barazangi) (Geodynamic Series, Vol. 13, AGU, Washington, D. C. 1986) pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L., andBarazangi, M., eds.,Reflection Seismology: A Global Perspective (Geodynamic Series, AGU, Vol. 13, 1986).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L., andBarazangi, M. eds,Reflection Seismology: The Continental Crust (Geodynamic Series AGU, Vol. 14, 1986).Google Scholar
  6. Campillo, M., Plantel, J. L., andBouchon, M. (1985),Frequency-dependent Attenuation in the Crust beneath Central Europe from Lg Waves: Data Analysis and Numerical Modeling, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.75, 1395–1413.Google Scholar
  7. Campillo, M., Bouchon, M., andMassinon, B. (1984),Theoretical Study of Excitation Spectral Characteristics and Geometrical Attenuation of Regional Seismic Phases, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.74, 79–90.Google Scholar
  8. Forsyth, D. (1981),Characteristics of the Western Quebec Seismic Zone, Can. J. Earth Sci.5, 1401–1407.Google Scholar
  9. Geise, P., Prodehl, C. andStein, A., eds.,Explosion Seismology in Central Europe (Springer Verlag 1976).Google Scholar
  10. Kelly, K. R., Ward, R. W., Treitel, S., andAlford, R. M. (1976),Synthetic Seismograms: A Finite Difference Approach, Geophysics41, 2–27.Google Scholar
  11. Kumarapelli, P. S., andSaull, V. A. (1966),The St. Lawrence Valley System, Can. J. Earth Sci.3, 639–658.Google Scholar
  12. Mandelbrot, B. B.,Fractals, Form, Chance, and Dimensions (W. H. Freman and Company 1977).Google Scholar
  13. Mathews, D., andSmith, C. (1987),Special Issue on Deep Seismic Reflection Profiling of the Continental Lithosphere, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.89.Google Scholar
  14. McGeary, S. (1987),Nontypical BIRPS on the Margin of the North Sea: The SHET Survey, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.89, 231–238.Google Scholar
  15. Mereu, R. F., Majumdar, S. B., andWhite, R. E. (1977),Moho Topography under the Highest Ranges of the Canadian Rockies, Can. J. Earth Sci.14, 196–208.Google Scholar
  16. Mereu, R. F., Wang, D., Kuhn, O., Forsyth, D., Green, A. G., Morel, P., Buchbinder, G., Crossley, D., Schwarz, E., DuBerger, R., Brooks, C., andClowes, R. (1986),The 1982 COCRUST Seismic Experiment Across the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben and Grenville Front in Ontario and Quebec, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.84, 491–514.Google Scholar
  17. Mooney, W. D., andProdehl, C., eds.,Proceedings of the 1980 Workshop of the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior on the Seismic Modelling of Laterally Varying Structures: Contributions Based on Data from the 1978 Saudi Arabian Refraction Profile (U. S. Geological Survey Circular 937, 1980).Google Scholar
  18. Morel A l'Hussier, P., Green, A. G., andPike, C. J. (1987),Crustal Refraction Across the Trans-Hudson Orogen/Williston, Basin of South Central Canada, J. Geophys. Res.92 (B7), 6403–6420.Google Scholar
  19. Nikolayev, A. V., andTregub, F. S. (1970),A Statistical Model of the Earth's Crust: Method and Results, Tectonophysics10, 573–578.Google Scholar
  20. Olsen, K. H., Braille, L. W., andStewart, J. N. (1986),Modeling Short-period Crustal Phases (P, Lg) for Long-range Refraction Profiles, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors31 334–347.Google Scholar
  21. Ojo, S. B., andMereu, R. F. (1986),The Effect of Random Velocity Functions on the Travel-times and Amplitudes of Seismic Waves, Geophys. J. Astr., Soc.84, 607–618.Google Scholar
  22. Stephenson, R. A., Zelt, C. A., Ellis, R. M., Hajnal, Z. Morel-Á-L'Huissier, P., Mereu, R. F., Northey, D. J., West. G. F., andKanasewich, E. (1989),Crust and Upper Mantle Structure and the Origin of the Peace River Arch, Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, in press.Google Scholar
  23. Walter, A. W., andMooney, W. D,Interpretations of the SJ-6 seismic reflection/refraction profile, InConf. Proc. Controlled Source Seismology Workshop on the Interpretation of Seismic Wave Propagation in Laterally Heterogeneous Terranes, Susono, Shizouka, Japan, Aug. 1985 (U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 87–73, 1987).Google Scholar
  24. Wu, R.-S., andAki, K. (1985),The Fractal Nature of the Inhomogeneities in the Lithosphere Evidenced from Seismic Wave Scattering, Pure Appl. Geophys.123, 806–818.Google Scholar
  25. Wu, R.-S., andAki, K. (1985),Elastic Wave Scattering by a Random Medium and the Small-scale Inhomogeneities in the Lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res.90 (B12), 10,261–10,273.Google Scholar
  26. Wu, R.-S. (1986),Heterogeneity Spectrum, Wave Scattering Response of a Fractal Random Medium and Rupture Processes in the Medium, Journal of Wave-Material Interaction1, 79–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. F. Mereu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeophysicsUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations