Skip to main content
Log in

Different types of sludge granules in UASB reactors treating acidified wastewaters

  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of a high energy substrate, i.e. sucrose, on the granular sludge yield and the development of different types of granular sludge was investigated by using Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bed (UASB) reactors fed with synthetic wastewater. The feed COD was a mixture of volatile fatty acids (VFA) i.e., 20, 40, and 40% of the COD as C2-, C3-, and C4-VFA, respectively. Furthermore, experiments were carried out in which 10 and 30% of the VFA COD was substituted with sucrose. The following distinctly different types of granules were observed in each testrun: in the reactor fed with solely VFA, black (B) and white (W) granules developed; in the reactor fed with a mixture of 90% VFA and 10% sucrose, three types of granules i.e., B, W, and grey (G) granules could be seen; in the reactor fed with 70% VFA and 30% sucrose, only W and G granules were found. The granular sludge yield increased proportional to the amount of sucrose COD. At steady-state performance of the reactors, specific acidogenic (SAA) and methanogenic (SMA) activity tests on these granules revealed that B granules had the highest SMA with low SAA. The W granules had very high SMA with low SAA. G granules gave the highest SAA with a considerable SMA. Measurement of coenzyme F420 revealed that B granules consist mainly of acetoclastic methanogens. The fore-mentioned tests were supplemented with analyses of the wash-out cells present in the reactor effluent and the results suggested that acidogens, if present, prevail at the granule surface. The B granules were particularly rich in Ca, Mn, and Zn minerals. The size distribution analysis showed that the granule diameter increased in the following order: B<W<G granules. The biogas bubbles tended to adhere to the B and W granules but not so strongly to the G granules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA, AWWA & WPCF (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edition. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Austermann-Haun U, Seyfried CF, Kunst S, Banziger W & Rosenwinkel KH (1993) Anacrobic pretreatment in campaign industries. In: Seventh International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, paper submitted. Cape Town, South Africa

  • Barbosa RA & Sant' Anna Jr GL (1989) Treatment of raw sewage in an UASB reactor. Wat. Res. 23: 1483–1490

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeftink HH & van den Heuvel JC (1988) Physical properties of bacterial aggregates in a continuous-flow reactor with biomass retention. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder AJB, Grotenhuis JTC & Hulshoff Pol LW (Eds) Granular Anaerobic Sludge; Microbiology and Technology. (pp 162–169) Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolfing J & Mulder JW (1985) Comparison of methane production rate and coenzyme F420 content of methanogenic consortia in anaerobic granular sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 1142–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubourguier HC, Buisson MN, Tissier JP, Prensier G & Albagnac G (1988a) Structural characteristics and metabolic activities of granular methanogenic sludge on a mixed defined substrate. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder AJB, Grotenhuis JTC & Hulshoff Pol LW (Eds) Granular Anaerobic Sludge; Microbiology and Technology. (pp 78–86) Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubourguier HC, Prensier G & Albagnac G (1988b) Structure and microbial activities of granular anaerobic sludge. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder AJB, Grotenhuis JTC & Hulshoff Pol LW (Eds) Granular Anaerobic Study; Microbiology and Technology. (pp 18–33) Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuzaki S, Chang YJ, Nishio N & Nagai S (1991a) Characteristics of granular methanogenic sludge grown on lactate in a UASB reactor. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 72: 465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuzaki S, Nishio N, Sakirai H & Nagai S (1991b) Characteristics of granular methanogenic granules grown on propionate in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 71: 50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotenhuis JTC, Kissel JC, Plugge CM, Stams AJM & Zehnder AJB (1991) Role of substrate concentration in particle size distribution of methanogenic granular sludge in UASB reactors. Wat. Res. 25: 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiot SR, Gorur SS & Kennedy KJ (1988) Nutritional and environmental factors contributing to microbial aggregation during upflow anaerobic sludge bed-filter (UBF) reactor start-up. In: Hall ER & Hobson PN (Eds) Proc. Fifth International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion. (pp 47–53) Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada H, Endo G, Tohya Y & Momoni K (1988) High rate performance and its related characteristics of granulated sludges in UASB reactors treating various wastewaters. In: Proc. Fifth International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion. (pp 1011–1019) Bologna, Italy

  • Hulshoff Pol LW (1989) The phenomenon of granulation of anaerobic sludge. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaric N, Blaszczyk R, Orphan L & Valladares J (1990) The characteristics of granules from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Wat. Res. 24: 1473–1477

    Google Scholar 

  • Lens P, de Beer D, Cronenberg C, Houwen F, Ottengraf S & Verstraete W (1993) Inhomogenic activity distribution in methanogenic aggregates: pH and glucose microprofiles. App. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 3803–3815

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettinga G, de Zeeuw W, Hulshoff Pol LW, Wiegant W & Rinzema A (1985) Anaerobic wastewater treatment based on biomass retention with emphasis on the UASB-process. In: Proc. Fourth International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion. (pp 279–302) Guangzhou, China

  • Morgan JW, Evison LM & Forster CF (1991) The impact of anaerobic extracellular polymers on the metabolism of granular anaerobic sludge. Environ. Technol. 12: 421–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross WR (1984) The phenomenon of sludge pelletisation in the anaerobic treatment of a maize processing waste. Water S.A. 10: 197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton DR & Tiedje JM (1984) General method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47: 850–857

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taya M, Aoki N & Kabayashi T (1986) Kinetic evaluation and monitoring of methanogen culture based upon fluorometry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 342–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilche A & Yang X (1987) Light and scanning electron microscope observations on the granular biomass of experimental SBAF and HABR reactors. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder AJB, Grotenhuis JTC & Hulshoff Pol LW (Eds) Granular Anaerobic Sludge; Microbiology and Technology. (pp 170–178) Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Uemura S & Harada H (1993) Microbial characteristics of methanogenic sludge consortia developed in thermophilic UASB reactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39: 654–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcke D & Verstraete W (1983) A practical method to estimate the acetoclastic methanogenic biomass in anaerobic sludge. J. Water Pollut. Control. Fed. 52: 720–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen B, Ysebaert B, Favere K, Van Wambeke M, Peeters T, Panic V, Vandenlangenbergh V & Verstraete W (1992) Acidogenesis in relation to in-reactor granule yield. Wat. Sci. Tech. 25: 21–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thaveesri, J., Daffonchio, D., Liessens, B. et al. Different types of sludge granules in UASB reactors treating acidified wastewaters. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 68, 329–337 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874143

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00874143

Key words

Navigation