Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reversible dementia: more than 10% or less than 1%?

A quantitative review

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dementia is reversible in some cases and these should be diagnosed without over-investigating the many others with irreversible disease. To estimate how often dementia can be reversed, we carried out a quantitative review of studies reported between 1972 and 1994 in which reversible dementia was diagnosed and outcome after treatment was assessed. We found 16 studies comprising 1551 patients. The percentages of reversed dementia varied widely: from 0 to 23% for partial and from 0 to 10% for full reversal. Depression and drug intoxication were the most frequent causes of reversible dementia, followed by metabolic and neurosurgical disorders. The percentage of both partial and full reversal of dementia has fallen in recent years, to less than 1% for both in the four most recent studies. This decrease could be associated with the change from an inpatient to an outpatient setting and the use of stricter diagnostic methods. We conclude that reversible dementia is very rare in an outpatient setting when using strict diagnostic methods. This has important implications for the diagnostic strategy in patients with dementia: major procedures should be performed selectively. In patients with clinical characteristics of Alzheimer's disease, CT of the brain is unlikely to detect a treatable cause of dementia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ames D, Flicker L, Helme RD (1992) A memory clinic at a geriatric hospital: rationale, routine and results from the first 100 patients. Med J Aust 156:618–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry PP, Moskowitz MA (1988) The diagnosis of reversible dementia in the elderly. A critical review. Arch Intern Med 148:1914–1918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer AJ, Pathy MSJ, Twining C (1987) The memory clinic. A new approach to the detection of early dementia. Drugs 33[Suppl 2]:84–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brodaty H (1990) Low diagnostic yield in a memory disorder clinic. Int Psychogeriatr 2:149–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian Consensus Conference on the Assessment of Dementia (1991) Assessing dementia: the Canadian consensus. Can Med Assoc J 144:851–853

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarfield AM (1988) The reversible dementias: do they reverse? Ann Intern Med 109:476–486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarfield AM (1990) Should a major imaging procedure (CT or MRI) be required in the workup of dementia? An opposing view. J Fam Pract 31:405–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarfield AM, Foley JM (1993) The American and Canadian consensus conferences on dementia: is there consensus? J Am Geriatr Soc 41:883–886

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Consensus conference: differential diagnosis of dementing diseases (1987) JAMA 258:3411–3416

  10. Cummings J, Benson DF, LoVerme S Jr (1980) Reversible dementia. Illustrative cases, definition, and review. JAMA 243:2434–2439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cunha UGV (1990) An investigation of dementia among elderly outpatients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 82:261–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Delaney P (1982) Dementia: the search for treatable causes. South Med J 75:707–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Draper B (1991) Potentially reversible dementia: a review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 25:506–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eagger SA, Levy R, Sahakian BJ (1991) Tacrine in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 337:989–992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Engel PA, Gelber J (1992) Does computed tomographic brain imaging have a place in the diagnosis of dementia? Arch Intern Med 152:1437–1440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox JH, Topel JL, Huckmann MS (1975) Dementia in the elderly — a search for treatable illnesses. J Gerontol 30:557–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freemon FR (1976) Evaluation of patients with progressive intellectual deterioration. Arch Neurol 33:658–659

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freemon FR, Rudd SM (1982) Clinical features that predict potentially reversible progressive intellectual deterioration. J Am Geriatr Soc 30:449–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon M, Freedman M (1990) Evaluating dementia: what price testing? Can Med Assoc J 142:1367–1370

    Google Scholar 

  20. Greenland S (1987) Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev 9:1–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hedner K, Gustafson L, Steen G, Steen B (1987) Screening of patients admitted to a geriatric hospital with supposed organic dementia. Compr Gerontol A 1:55–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hofman A, Rocca WA, Brayne C, Breteler MMB, Clarke M, Cooper B, et al (1991) The prevalence of dementia in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980–1990 findings. Int J Epidemiol 20:736–748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hutton JT (1981) Results of clinical assessment for the dementia syndrome: implications for epidemiologic studies. In: Schuman LM, Mortimer JA (eds) The epidemiology of dementia. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  24. Katzman R (1978) Dementias. Postgrad Med 64:119–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Katzman R (1990) Should a major imaging procedure (CT or MRI) be required in the workup of dementia? An affirmative view. J Fam Pract 31:401–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kellett JM (1987) How far to investigate dementia? Postgrad Med J 63:963–966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Larson EB, Reifler BV, Featherstone HJ, English DR (1984) Dementia in elderly outpatients: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 100:417–423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larson EB, Reifler BV, Sumi SM, Canfield CG, Chinn NM (1985) Diagnostic evaluation of 200 elderly outpatients with suspected dementia. J Gerontol 40:536–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larson EB, Reifler BV, Sumi SM, Canfield CG, Chinn NM (1986) Diagnostic tests in the evaluation of dementia. A prospective study of 200 elderly outpatients. Arch Intern Med 146:1917–1922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Light RJ, Pillemer DB (1984) Summing up. The science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  31. Livingston G, Sax K, Willison J, Blizard B, Mann A (1990) The Gospel Oak Study stage II: the diagnosis of dementia in the community. Psychol Med 20:881–891

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maletta GJ (1990) The concept of “reversible” dementia. How nonreliable terminology may impair effective treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:136–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marsden CD, Harrison MJG (1972) Outcome of investigation of patients with presenile dementia. BMJ 2:249–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin BA, Thompson EG, Eastwood MR (1983) The clinical investigation of dementia. Can J Psychiatry 28:282–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin DC, Miller J, Kapoor W, Karpf M, Boller F (1987) Clinical prediction rules for computed tomographic scanning in senile dementia. Arch Intern Med 147:77–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McCormick WC, Larson EB (1990) Pragmatism and probabilities in dementia. Hosp Pract (December) 15:93–114

    Google Scholar 

  37. O'Mahony D, Walsh JB, Coakley D (1992) ‘Pseudo-Alzheimer's’ and primary brain tumour. Postgrad Med J 68:673–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Renvoize EB, Gaskell RK, Klar HM (1985) Results of investigations in 150 demented patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Br J Psychiatry 147:204–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith JS, Kiloh LG (1981) The investigation of dementia: results in 200 consecutive admissions. Lancet I:824–827

    Google Scholar 

  40. Somerfield MR, Weisman CS, Ury W, Chase GA, Folstein MF (1991) Physician practices in the diagnosis of dementing disorders. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:172–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Teunisse S, Derix MMA, Crevel H van (1991) Assessing the severity of dementia: patient and caregiver. Arch Neurol 48:274–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Victoratos GC, Lenman JAR, Herzberg L (1977) Neurological investigation of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 130:131–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson DB, Guyatt GH, Streiner DL (1987) The diagnosis of dementia. Can Med Assoc J 137:625–629

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M. D. Weytingh & H. van Crevel

  2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    P. M. M. Bossuyt

Authors
  1. M. D. Weytingh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. M. M. Bossuyt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. van Crevel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weytingh, M.D., Bossuyt, P.M.M. & van Crevel, H. Reversible dementia: more than 10% or less than 1%?. J Neurol 242, 466–471 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873551

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873551

Key words

Search

Navigation