Skip to main content
Log in

Variants of openness

  • Published:
Applied Categorical Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Algebraic conditions on frame homomorphisms representing various types of openness requirements on continuous maps are investigated. It turns out that several of these can be expressed in terms of formulas involving pseudocomplements. A full classification of the latter is presented which shows that they group into five equivalence classes and establishes the logical connections between them. Among the relation of our algebraic conditions to continuous maps between topological spaces, we establish that the coincidence of the algebraic and topological notion of openness is equivalent to the separation axiomT D for the domain space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. E. Aull and W. J. Thron: Separation axioms betweenT 0 andT 1,Indag. Math. 24 (1962), 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Banaschewski: Frames and compactifications, Proceedings,Symposium on Extension Spaces, 1967, Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin (1969), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Banaschewski and A. Pultr:Booleanization as Reflection, Preprint 1961.

  4. W. W. Comfort and N. B. Hindman: Refining families for ultrafilters,Math. Zeitschr. 149 (1976), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Frolik: Remarks concerning the invariance of Baire spaces under mappings,Czech. Math. J. 11 (1961), 381–385.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Herrlich and G. E. Strecker: H-closed Spaces and Reflective Subcategories,Math. Annalen 177 (1968), 302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Isbell: Atomless parts of spaces,Math. Scand 31 (1972), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. S. Janković and C. Konstadilaki-Saovopoulou: On α-continuous functions, submitted toMath. Bohemica.

  9. P. T. Johnstone:Stone Spaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. T. Johnstone:Factorization Theorems for Geometric Morphisms II, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 915, ‘Categorical Aspects of Topology and Analysis’, 216–233.

  11. P. T. Johnstone: Open locales and exponentiation,contemp. Math. 30 (1984), 84–116.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. T. Johnstone:A Constructive Theory of Uniform Locales, I. General Topology and Applications. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics134. Dekker (New York, 1991), 187–193.

  13. A. Joyal and M. Tierney:An Extension of the Galois Theory of Grothendieck, Memoirs of the AMS, Volume 51, Number 309 (September 1984).

  14. J. L. Kelley:General Topology, Van Nostrand 1955.

  15. N. Levine: Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces,Amer. Math. Monthly 70 (1963), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Mioduszewski and L. Rudolf: H-closed and extremally disconnected Hausdorff spaces,Dissertationes Math 66 (1969).

  17. V. Pták: Completeness and the open mapping theorem,Bull. Soc. Math. France 86 (1958), 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Sikorski: ‘Boolean algebras’,Ergebnisse der Math. und Ihrer Grenzgebiete, Bd. 25, Springer 1864.

  19. P. Simon and P. Vojtáš, oral communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In honour of Dieter Pumplün on the occassion of his 60th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banaschewski, B., Pultr, A. Variants of openness. Appl Categor Struct 2, 331–350 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873038

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873038

Mathematical Subject Classifications (1991)

Key words

Navigation