Abstract
We describe a new approach for the classification of a seafloor that is imaged with high frequency sonar and optical sensors. Information from these sensors is combined to evaluate the material properties of the seafloor. Estimation of material properties is based on the phenomenological relationship between the acoustical image intensity, surface roughness, and intrinsic object properties in the underwater scene. The sonar image yields backscatter estimates, while the optical stereo imagery yields surface roughness parameters. These two pieces of information are combined by a composite roughness model of high-frequency bottom backscattering phenomenon. The model is based on the conservation of acoustic energy travelling across a fluid-fluid interface. The model provides estimates of material density ratio and sound velocity ratio for the seafloor. These parameters serve as physically meaningful features for classification of the seafloor. Experimental results using real data illustrate the usefulness of this approach for autonomous and/or remotely operated undersea activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Nandhakumar and J.K. Aggarwal, “Integrated Analysis of Thermal and Visual Images for Scene Interpretation,”IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 10, No. 4 July 1988, pp. 469–481.
D.R. Jackson, D.P. Winebrenner, and A. Ishimaru, “Application of the Composite Roughness Model to High-Frequency Bottom Backscattering,”Journal Acoustic Soc. America, Vol. 79, No. 5, May 1986, pp. 1410–1422.
L.P. Volnistova and A.S. Drofa, “Influence of a Scattering Medium on Optical-Image Quality,” Izvestiya,Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1985.
H. Nguyen, P. Heckman, and A. Pai, “Real-time pattern recognition for guidance of an autonomous undersea submersible,”IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April 24–29, pp. 1767–1770.
D.M. Owen, “A multi-shot stereoscopic camera for close-up ocean-bottom photography,” inDeep-Sea Photography, editor John B. Hersey, (The Johns Hopkins Press, 1967), pp. 95–105.
Carl J. Shipek, “Deep-sea photography in support of underwater acoustic research,” inDeep-Sea Photography, editor John B. Hersey, (The Johns Hopkins Press, 1967), pp. 89–94.
E.Y.T. Kuo, “Wave Transmission and scattering at irregular surfaces,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 36(11), pp. 2135–2142, Nov. 1964.
T.K. Stanton, “Sonar estimates of seafloor microroughness,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 75(3), pp. 809–818, 469–481, March 1984.
W.K. Stewart, “Multisensor Modeling Underwater with Uncertain Information,” Tech. Report AI-TR 1143, MIT AILab, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
M.J. Chantler and C.St.J. Reid, “Integration of ultrasonic and vision sensors for3-D underwater scene analysis,”IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Conference, Cambridge, Ma., Nov. 15–17, 1989.
S. Stanic, K.B. Briggs, P. Fleischer, W.B. Sawyer, and R.I. Ray, “High-frequency acoustic backscattering from a coarse shell ocean bottom,”J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 85(1), pp. 125–136, January 1989.
D.R. Jackson, A.M. Baird, J.J. Crisp, and P. Thompson, “High-frequency bottom backscatter measurements in shallow water,”Journal Acoustic Soc. America, Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 1188–1199, October 1986.
R.J. Urick,Principles of Underwater Sound (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).
D.R. Jackson, J.G. Dworski, and K.B. Briggs, “Acoustic Scattering from the Bottom in the STRESS experiment,” Eos p. 1144, October 24, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the National Science Foundation Research Initiation Award IRI-91109584.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nandhakumar, N., Malik, S. Multisensor integration for underwater scene classification. Appl Intell 5, 207–216 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872222
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872222