Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 273–283 | Cite as

“Greed is good” ... or is it? Economic ideology and moral tension in a graduate school of business

  • Janet S. Walker


This article reports the results of an exploratory investigation of a particular area of moral tension experienced by MBA students in a graduate school of business. During the first phase of the study, MBA students' own perceptions about the moral climate and culture of the business school were examined. The data gathered in this first part of the study indicate that the students recognize that a central part of this culture is constituted by a shared familiarity with a set of institutionally reinforced premises about human behavior and motivation including the ideas that: 1) people are self-interested utility-maximizers, 2) individuals should be unimpeded in their pursuit of their own self-interest through “economic” transactions, and 3) virtually all human interactionsare economic transactions. The data further indicated that the business students experience a degree of tension between this ethic of “self-maximizing” and the “everyday” ethics prevalent in our broader culture, in which altruism and selflessness are central elements. The final section of the study was an effort to see whether and how these institutionally sanctioned premises were integrated into the students' arguments about the relationship between self-interest and social responsibility.


Economic Growth Graduate School Social Responsibility Human Behavior Final Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abell, J. D.: 1990, ‘A Note on the Teaching of Ethics in the MBA Macroeconomics Course’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S.: 1976,The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S.: 1981,A Treatise on the Family (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  4. Dumont, L.: 1977,From Mandeville to Marx: The Genesis and Triumph of Economic Ideology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  5. Etzioni, A.: 1988,The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  6. Ferman, F. K.: 1990, ‘Teaching Business Ethics: Questioning the Assumptions, Seeking New Directions’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S.: (1905) 1960,Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious (W. W. Norton and Company Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, M.: 1953,Essays in Positive Economics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits’,New York Times Magazine, September 13.Google Scholar
  10. Geertz, C.: 1973,The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  11. Hirschman, A. O.: 1984, ‘Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse’,American Economic Review 74, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, T. M. and Gautschi, F. H.: 1988, ‘Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 231–248.Google Scholar
  13. Lutz, M. A. and Lux, K.: 1988,Humanistic Economics (Bootstrap Press, New York).Google Scholar
  14. Maguire, D. C.: 1978,The Moral Choice (Winston Press, Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
  15. Marwell, G. and Ames, R. E.: 1981, ‘Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?’,Journal of Public Economics 15, pp. 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reilly, B. J. and Kyj, M. J.: 1990, ‘Economics and Ethics’,Journal of Business Ethics 9, 691–698.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, A.: (1776) 1937,Wealth of Nations, Modern Library Edition (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  18. Stigler, G. J.: 1981, ‘Economics or Ethics?’, in S. McMurrin, ed.,Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. II (University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  19. Stigler, G. J. and Becker, G. S.: 1977, ‘De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum’,American Economic Review 67, pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
  20. Wood, J. A., Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., and Moore, C. W.: 1988, ‘Ethical Attitudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning’,Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 249–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet S. Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Committee on Human DevelopmentUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations