Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic multi-knowledge-base systems

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article lays the groundwork for theprobabilistic multi-knowledge-base system (PMKBS), a new decision aid specifically tailored to the needs of a decision-maker faced with the derivation of a consensus diagnosis. In this article, we develop the PMKBS architecture in several ways. First, we define the basic problem that it addresses, and review the fundamental tools upon which it is based. Next, we describe its underlying theory, and explain how some general elicitation and modeling procedures form a viable design paradigm. Finally, we describe a small family of prototype PMKBSs that address problems related to pathologies of the lymph system, and evaluate their performance. Taken together, these discussions and prototypes demonstrate that the PMKBS architecture appears to be flexible, practical, and powerful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. H. Bond and L. Gasser, eds.,Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Gasser and M. N. Huhns, eds.,Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. E. Heckerman, E. J. Horvitz, and B. N. Nathwani, “Toward normative expert systems: Part I. The Pathfinder project,”Meth. Inf. Med. vol. 31, pp. 90–105, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. E. Heckerman and B. N. Nathwani, “An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Pathfinder,”Computers Biomed. Res. vol. 25, pp. 56–74, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. E. Heckerman and B. N. Nathwani, “Toward normative expert systems: Part II. Probability-based representations for efficient knowledge acquisition and inference,”Meth. Inf. Med. vol. 31, pp. 106–116, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. B. Lenat and R. V. Guha,Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. H. Boose, “A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct psychology,”Int. J. Man-Machine Studies vol. 23, pp. 495–525, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. H. Boose,Expertise Transfer for Expert System Design Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. H. Boose, “Rapid acquisition and combination of knowledge from multiple experts in the same domain,”Future Comput. Syst. vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 191–216, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Boose and J. M. Bradshaw, “Expertise transfer and complex problems: Using AQUINAS as a knowledge acqusition workbench for expert systems,” inKnowledge-Based Systems: Knowledge Acquisition Tools for Expert Systems edited by J. H. Boose and B. R. Gaines, vol. 2, Academic Press: New York, pp. 39–64, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Raiffa,Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. J. Savage,The Foundations of Statistics 2nd edition, Dover: New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Hayes-Roth, D. A. Waterman, and D. B. Lenat, editors,Building Expert Systems Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. A. Waterman,A Guide to Expert Systems Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Howard and J. E. Matheson, editors,The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis Strategic Decision Group: Menlo Park, CA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. J. Savage, “Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations,”J. Am. Statist. Assoc. vol. 66, no. 336, pp. 783–801, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards,Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Genest and J. V. Zidek, “Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography,”Statistical Sci. vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 114–148, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. L. Winkler, “The consensus of subjective probability distribution,”Management Sci. vol. 15, no. 2, pp. B61-B75, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Abramson and A. J. Finizza, “Using belief networks to forecast oil prices,”Int. J. Forecasting vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 299–316, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Holtzman,Intelligent Decision Systems Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. J. Horvitz, J. S. Breese, and M. Henrion, “Decision theory in expert systems and artificial intelligence,”Int. J. Approx. Reasoning vol. 2, pp. 247–302, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. L. Lauritzen and D. J. Spiegelhalter, “Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems,”J. R. Statist. Soc. B vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 157–224, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Pearl,Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. F. Bordley, “A multiplicative formula for aggregation of individual probability assessments 39–64,”Management Sci. vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1137–1148, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. T. Clemen, “Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography,”Int. J. Forecasting vol. 5, pp. 559–583, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. C. Dalkey, “Towards a theory of group estimation,” inThe Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications edited by H. A. Limstone and M. Turoff, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, pp. 236–261, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. French, “Group consensus probability distribution: A critical survey,” inBayesian Statistics 2 edited by J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith, Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, pp. 183–202, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. W. J. Granger, “Combining forecasts—Twenty years later,”J. Forecasting vol. 8, pp. 167–173, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Makridakis, A. Andersen, R. Carbone, R. Fildes, M. Hibon, R. Lewandowski, J. Newton, E. Parsen, and R. L. Winkler, “The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition,”J. Forecasting vol. 1, pp. 111–153, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. A. Morris, “Decision analysis expert use,”Management Sci. vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1233–1241, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Stone, “The opinion pool,”Ann. Math. Statist. vol. 32, pp. 1339–1342, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Baral, S. Kraus, and J. Minker, “Combining multiple knowledge bases,”IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 208–220, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Mittal and C. L. Dym, “Knowledge acquisition from multiple experts,”The AI Mag. vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 32–36, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Reboh, “Extracting useful advice from conflicting expertise,” inProc. Eighth Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. William Kaufmann: Los Altos, CA, 1983, pp. 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Kelly,The Psychology of Personal Construct Norton: New York, NY, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. P. Massey and W. A. Wallace, “Focus groups as a knowledge elicitation technique: An exploratory study,”IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 193–200, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  38. K. L. McGraw and K. Harbison-Briggs,Knowledge Acquisition: Principles and Guidelines Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  39. V. Jagannathan and A. Elmaghraby, “MEDKAT: Multiple Expert Delphi-Based Knowledge Acqusition Tool,” Technical report, Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Trice and R. Davis, “Consensus knowledge acquisition,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Technical Report AI Memo No. 1183, 1989.

  41. K.-C. Ng. and B. Abramson, “Consensus diagnosis: A simulation study,”IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 916–928, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. de Finetti, “Probabilities of probabilities: A real problem or a misunderstanding,” inNew Developments in the Applications of Bayesian Methods edited by A. Aykac and C. Brumat, North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp. 1–10, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. E. Heckerman and H. Jimison, “A Bayesian perspective on confidence,” inUncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 3 edited by L. N. Kanal, T. S. Levitt, and J. F. Lemmer, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North Holland): Amsterdam, pp. 149–160, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. J. Spiegelhalter, “A statistical view of uncertainty in expert systems,” inArtificial Intelligence & Statistics edited by W. A. Gales, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, pp. 17–55, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. P. Nii, “Blackboard systems: The blackboard model of problem solving and the evolution of blackboard architecture,”AI Mag. vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 38–53, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. P. Nii, “Blackboard systems: Blackboard application systems, blackboard systems from a knowledge engineering perspective,”AI Mag. vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 82–106, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. E. Heckerman,Probabilistic Similarity Networks MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  48. K.-C. Ng,Probabilistic Multi-Knowledge-Base Systems: Automated Group Decision Making in Expert Systems Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, KC., Abramson, B. Probabilistic multi-knowledge-base systems. Appl Intell 4, 219–236 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872110

Key words

Navigation