Skip to main content
Log in

A neural network model for estimating option prices

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A neural network model that processes financial input data is developed to estimate the market price of options at closing. The network's ability to estimate closing prices is compared to the Black-Scholes model, the most widely used model for the pricing of options. Comparisons reveal that the mean squared error for the neural network is less than that of the Black-Scholes model in about half of the cases examined. The differences and similarities in the two modeling approaches are discussed. The neural network, which uses the same financial data as the Black-Scholes model, requires no distribution assumptions and learns the relationships between the financial input data and the option price from the historical data. The option-valuation equilibrium model of Black-Scholes determines option prices under the assumptions that prices follow a continuous time path and that the instantaneous volatility is nonstochastic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Dutta and S. Shekhar, “Bond-rating: A non-conservative application of neural networks,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, IEEE Computer Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 1988, pp. 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Jang, F. Lai, B. Jiang, and L. Chien, “An intelligent trend prediction and reversal recognition system using dual-module neural networks”, inProc. First Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Appl. on Wall Street, IEEE Computer Press: New York, 1991, pp. 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Salchenberger, E. M. Cinar, and N. Lash, “Neural networks: A new tool for predicting thrift failures,”Decision Sci., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 899–916, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Collins, S. Ghosh, and C. Scofield, “An application of a multiple neural-network learning system to emulation of mortgage underwriting judgments,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, IEEE Computer Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 1988, pp. 459–466.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Black and M. Scholes, “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,”J. Pol. Econ., vol. 81, pp. 637–654, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Macbeth and L. Merville, “An empirical examination of the Black-Scholes call option pricing model,”J. Fin., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1173–1186, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Chiras and S. Manaster, “The information content of option prices and a test of market efficiency,”J. Finl. Econ., vol. 6, pp. 213–234, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Malliaris and W. Brock,Stochastic Methods in Economics and Finance, North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Chesney and L. Scott, “Pricing European currency options: a comparison of the modified Black-Scholes model and a random variance model,”J. Fin. Quant. Anal., vol. 24, pp. 267–284, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Galai, “A survey of empirical tests of option-pricing models,” inOption Pricing, edited by M. Brenner, Lexington Books: Lexington, MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Yap, “Constraint logic programming and option trading,”IEEE Expert, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 42–50, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Mizoguchi and L. Ohwada H, “A constraint-oriented decision support system for option-based investment strategies,”Proc. First Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Appl. on Wall Street, IEEE Computer Press: New York, 1991, pp. 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. White, “Some asymtotic result for learning in single hidden layer feedforward network models,”J. Am. Statist. Assoc., vol. 84, pp. 1003–1013, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland,Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Tam and M. Kiang, “Managerial applications of neural networks: The case of bank failure predictions,”Management Sci., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 926–947, July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Hawley, J. Johnson, and D. Raina, “Artificial neural systems: A new tool for decision making”,Finl. Analyst, vol. 46, pp. 63–72, November 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Swales and Y. Yoon, “Applying artificial neural networks to investment analysis,”Finl. Analyst, vol. 69, pp. 78–80, October 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Geisser, “The predictive sample reuse method with applications,”J. Am. Statist. Assoc., vol. 70, pp. 350–360, June 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Mosteller and J.W. Tukey, “Data analysis, including statistics,” inHandbook of Social Psychology, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson. Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Weigend, B. Huberman, and D. Rumelhart, “Predicting sunspots and exchange rates with connectionist networks,” inNonlinear Modeling and Forecasting, Proc. vol. XII, Sante Fe; Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 1990, pp. 395–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malliaris, M., Salchenberger, L. A neural network model for estimating option prices. Appl Intell 3, 193–206 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871937

Key words

Navigation