Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 271–279 | Cite as

Nuclear nightmares in the Philippines

  • William Beaver
Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The construction of the Philippine's first nuclear power plant by Westinghouse has come to symbolize the corruption and cronyism of the Marcos' years. The plant has created so much controversy that it has yet to operate, in a country that desperately needs electrical power. The entire affair suggests that American multinationals cannot simply adopt the business practices of the host country, but instead must carefully analyze the political and business environments of their foreign based operations, and then take into account the long-term ethical implications of their decisions. The case also suggests that government needs to play a more active role in regulating multinationals, especially when sophisticated and potentially dangerous technologies are involved.

Keywords

Economic Growth Power Plant Electrical Power Active Role Host Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansberry, C. and M. Miller: 1988, ‘Westinghouse Seeks Arbitrator in Dispute With Philippines Over $2.4 Million Plant’,The Wall Street Journal, December 2, A8.Google Scholar
  2. Butterfield, F.: 1978, ‘Marcos Facing Criticism, May End $1 Million Contract’,The New York Times, January 14, 1.Google Scholar
  3. Butterfield, F.: 1988, ‘Westinghouse, Jersey Firm are Sued by Philippines’,The New York Times, D3.Google Scholar
  4. Crittenden, A.: 1978, ‘Behind the Philippine Loan’,The New York Times, February 12, sect. 3, 9.Google Scholar
  5. Dumaine, B.: 1986, ‘Westinghouse's Nuclear Fiasco’,Fortune 114, 39–46.Google Scholar
  6. ‘Export-Import Guarantees’,The New York Times, May 4, 1981, 4.Google Scholar
  7. Fallows, J.: 1987, ‘A Damaged Culture’,Atlantic Monthly 260, 49–54.Google Scholar
  8. Gillespie, K.: 1987, ‘Middle East Responses to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’,California Management Review 29, 9–30.Google Scholar
  9. Krammer, B.: 1978, ‘Its Whom You Know That Really Counts’,The Wall Street Journal, January 12, 1.Google Scholar
  10. Mydans, S.: 1986, ‘Manila Labors To Pay For Unused Atomic Plant’,The New York Times, May 28, 16.Google Scholar
  11. ‘NRC Skirts Safety Issue in Export Approval’: 1980,Science 208, 1014.Google Scholar
  12. ‘The Opposites: G.E. Grows While Westinghouse Shrinks’: 1977,Business Week, January 31, 60–66.Google Scholar
  13. ‘Problems in the Philippines Chill an Economic Boom’: 1979,Business Week, August 27, 50–54.Google Scholar
  14. Richert, L.: 1976, ‘Greeting is Cautious for Philippine Issue Total $367.2 Million’,The Wall Street Journal, August 19, 19.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, J.: 1979, ‘Westinghouse Sues NRC’,Science 250, 876.Google Scholar
  16. ‘Soviets Offer Manila a Nuclear Facility in Place of the One Westinghouse is Building’: 1978,The Wall Street Journal, February 15, 19.Google Scholar
  17. Stern, G. and A. S. Hays: 1992, ‘Westinghouse's Request to Dismiss Lawsuit by Philippines is Denied’,The Wall Street Journal, February 6, B6.Google Scholar
  18. Stern, G. and L. Valerano: 1992, ‘Westinghouse, Philippines Set Accord’,The Wall Street Journal, March 5, A4.Google Scholar
  19. Stern, G. and L. MacDonald: 1992, ‘Action by Philippines Threatens Pact with Westinghouse on Nuclear Pact’,The Wall Street Journal, December 2, A8.Google Scholar
  20. Wald, M. L.: 1992, ‘A Westinghouse Memo Tells of Payments in the Philippines’,The New York Times, March 6, D1.Google Scholar
  21. ‘Westinghouse Defends Philippine Role’: 1978,The Wall Street Journal, January 17, 20.Google Scholar
  22. ‘Westinghouse Free of Bribery Charges’: 1991,The Tribune Review, December 18, A3.Google Scholar
  23. ‘Westinghouse Gets Manila Bid’: 1989,The New York Times, April 12, 37.Google Scholar
  24. ‘Westinghouse Bribery Trial Begins’: 1992,The Tribune Review, March 2, A4.Google Scholar
  25. Worthy, F.: 1989, ‘When Someone One Wants a Payoff’,Fortune 120 (Pacific Rim Issue), 117–120.Google Scholar
  26. Wren, C. S.: 1986, ‘Manila Cabinet Scrapping Atomic Plant’,The New York Times, April 10, 11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Beaver
    • 1
  1. 1.Robert Morris CollegeCorapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations