Abstract
Individuals' moral judgments of certain business practices and their decisions to engage in those practices are influenced by their personal moral philosophies: (a) situationists advocate striving for the best consequences possible irrespective of moral maxims; (b) subjectivists reject moral guidelines and base judgments on personal values and practical concerns; (c) absolutists assume that actions are moral, provided they yield positive consequences and conform to moral rules; (d) exceptionists prefer to follow moral dictates but allow for exceptions for practical reasons. These variations, which are based on two fundamental dimensions (concern for principles and concern for promoting human welfare) influence a variety of moral processes and have implications for ethical debates over business practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A.: 1990, ‘Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control’,Journal of Social Issues 46(1), pp. 27–46.
Boyce, W. D. and Jensen, L. C.: 1978,Moral Reasoning: A Psychological—Philosophical Integration (U. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln).
Derry, R.: 1989, ‘An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 855–862.
Fletcher, J.: 1966,Situation Ethics (Westminster Press, Philadelphia).
Forsyth, D. R.: 1978,Moral Attribution and the Evaluation of Action, unpublished doctoral dissertation (University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl).
Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, pp. 175–184.
Forsyth, D. R.: 1981a, ‘A Psychological Perspective on Ethical Uncertainties in Behavioral Research’, in A. J. Kimmel (ed.),New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: Ethics of Human Subject Research, No. 10 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Forsyth, D. R.: 1981b, ‘Moral Judgment: The Influence of Ethical Ideology’,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7, pp. 218–223.
Forsyth, D. R.: 1985, ‘Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral Judgment’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, pp. 264–272.
Forsyth, D. R.: (in press), ‘Values, Conceptions of Science, and the Social Psychological Study of Morality’, in M. Azmitia, W. M. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz (eds.),The Role of Values in Psychology and Human Development (Wiley, New York).
Forsyth, D. R. and Berger, R. E.: 1982, ‘The Effects of Ethical Ideology on Moral Behavior’,Journal of Social Psychology 117, pp. 53–56.
Forsyth, D. R. and Matney, L.: 1990, ‘The Emotional Consequences of Selfish and Selfless Actions’, paper presented at the Second Annual Convention (June 1990) of the American Psychological Society, Dallas TX.
Forsyth, D. R. and Nye, J. L.: 1990, ‘Personal Moral Philosophies and Moral Choice’,Journal of Research in Personality 24, pp. 398–414.
Forsyth, D. R., Nye, J. L. and Kelly, K.: 1988, ‘Idealism Relativism, and the Ethic of Caring’,Journal of Psychology 122, pp. 243–248.
Forsyth, D. R. and Pope, W. R.: 1984, ‘Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, pp. 1365–1375.
Freud, S.: 1927, ‘The Psychopathology of Everyday Life’ (Hogarth Press, London).
Gilligan, C.: 1982,In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Haan, N.: 1978, ‘Two Moralities in Action Context’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, pp. 286–305.
Haan, N.: 1982, ‘Can Research on Morality be “Scientific”’,American Psychologist 37, pp. 1096–1104.
Haan, N.: 1986, ‘Systematic Variability in the Quality of Moral Action, as Defined in Two Formulations’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, pp. 1271–1284.
Haan, N., Aerts, E. and Copper, B: 1985,On Moral Grounds: The Search for Practical Morality (New York University Press, New York).
Hartshorne, H. and May, M. A.: 1928,Studies in the Nature of Characten (MacMillan, New York).
James, W.: 1891/1973, ‘The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life’, in P. E. Davis (ed.),Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Columbus, OH).
Kant, I.: 1873/1973, ‘Critique of Pure Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics. T. K. Abbott (trans),’ in P. E. Davis (ed.),Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Columbus, OH).
Kelley, M.: 1989, ‘Commentary on “An empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers’,Journal of Business Ethics 8, pp. 863–864.
Klass, E. T.: 1978, ‘Psychological Effects of Immoral Actions: The Experimental Evidence’,Psychological Bulletin 85, pp. 756–771.
Kohlberg, L.: 1983,Essays in Moral Development, Vol. 2 (Harper & Row, New York).
Kurtines, W. M.: 1984, ‘Moral Behavior as Rule Governed Behavior: A Psychosocial Role-Theoretical Approach to Moral Behavior and Development’, in W. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (eds.),Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development: Basic Issues in Theory and Research (Wiley, New York).
Kurtines, W. M.: 1986, ‘Moral Behavior as Rule Governed Behavior: Person and Situation Effects on Moral Decision Making’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, pp. 784–791.
Leary, M. R., Knight, P. D. and Barnes, B. D.: 1986, ‘Ethical Ideologies of the Machiavellian’,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12, pp. 75–80.
Schlenker, B. R. and Forsyth, D. R.: 1977, ‘On the Ethics of Psychological Research’,Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, pp. 369–396.
Sharp, F. C.: 1898, ‘An Objective Study of Some Moral Judgments’,American Journal of Psychology 9, pp. 198–234.
Singh, B. and Forsyth, D. R.: 1989, ‘Sexual Attitudes and Moral Values: The Importance of Idealism and Relativism’,Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27, pp. 160–162.
Waterman, A. S.: 1988, ‘On the Uses of Psychological Theory and Research in the Process of Ethical Inquiry’,Psychological Bulletin 103, pp. 283–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Donelson R. Forsyth is Professor in the Department of Psychology at Virginia Commonwealth University. A social psychologist, his three major interests are affective and attributional reactions in interpersonal, education, and clinical settings, individual differences in ethical ideology, and the dynamics of interacting groups. He is the author of numerous journal articles, as well as several books dealing with social psychology, group processes, and health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forsyth, D.R. Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. J Bus Ethics 11, 461–470 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870557
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870557