Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 5–6, pp 379–389 | Cite as

Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities

  • Dennis A. Gioia
Behavioral Aspects Of Business Ethics

Abstract

This article details the personal involvement of the author in the early stages of the infamous Pinto fire case. The paper first presents an insider account of the context and decision environment within which he failed to initiate an early recall of defective vehicles. A cognitive script analysis of the personal experience is then offered as an explanation of factors that led to a decision that now is commonly seen as a definitive study in unethical corporate behavior. The main analytical thesis is that script schemas that were guiding cognition and action at the time precluded consideration of issues in ethical terms because the scripts did not include ethical dimensions.

Keywords

Economic Growth Personal Experience Ethical Dimension Decision Environment Definitive Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P.: 1976, ‘Script Processing in Attitude Formation and Decision-Making’, in J. S. Carroll and J. W. Payne (eds.),Cognition and Social Behavior (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
  2. Abelson, R. P.: 1981, ‘Psychological Status of the Script Concept’,American Psychologist 36, pp. 715–729.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. and Whitten, L.: 1976, ‘Auto Maker Shuns Safer Gas Tank’,Washington Post (December 30), p. B-7.Google Scholar
  4. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B. and Turner, T. J.: 1979, ‘Scripts in Memory for Text’,Cognitive Psychology 11, pp. 177–220.Google Scholar
  5. Cantor, N. and Mischel, W.: 1979, ‘Prototypes in Person Perception’, in L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 12 (Academic Press, New York), pp. 3–51.Google Scholar
  6. Cullen, F. T., Maakestad, W. J. and Cavender, G.: 1987,Corporate Crime Under Attack (Anderson Publishing Co., Chicago).Google Scholar
  7. Dowie, M.: 1977, ‘How Ford Put Two Million Firetraps on Wheels’,Business and Society Review 23, pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
  8. Fiske, S. T.: 1982, ‘Schema-Triggered Affect: Applications to Social Perception’, in M. S. Clark and S. T. Fiske (eds.),Affect and Cognition (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
  9. Gatewood, E. and Carroll, A. B.: 1983, ‘The Anatomy of Corporate Social Response: The Rely, Firestone 500, and Pinto Cases’,Business Horizons, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
  10. Gellerman, S: 1986, ‘Why “Good” Managers Make Bad Ethical Choices’,Harvard Business Review (July–August), pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
  11. Gioia, D. A.: 1989, ‘Self-Serving Bias as a Self-Sensemaking Strategy’, in P. Rosenfeld, and R. Giacalone (eds.),Impression Management in the Organization (LEA, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 219–234.Google Scholar
  12. Gioia, D. A.: 1986, ‘Symbols, Scripts, and Sensemaking: Creating Meaning in the Organizational Experience’, in H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (eds.),The Thinking Organization: Dynamics of Organizational Social Cognition (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
  13. Gioia, D. A. and Manz, C. C.: 1985, ‘Linking Cognition and Behavior: A Script Processing Interpretation of Vicarious Learning’,Academy of Management Review 10, pp. 527–539.Google Scholar
  14. Gioia, D. A. and Poole, P. P.: 1984, ‘Scripts in Organizational Behavior’,Academy of Management Review 9, pp. 449–459.Google Scholar
  15. Graesser, A. C., Gordon, S. G. and Sawyer, J. D.: 1979, ‘Recognition Memory for Typical and Atypical Actions in Scripted Activities: Test of Script Pointer and Tag Hypothesis’,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, pp. 319–332.Google Scholar
  16. Graesser, A. C., Woll, S. B., Kowalski, D. J. and Smith, D. A.: 1980, ‘Memory for Typical and Atypical Actions in Scripted Activities’,Journal of Experimental Psychology 6, pp. 503–515.Google Scholar
  17. Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Development Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin (ed.),Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand-McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
  18. Louis, M. R. and Sutton, R. I.: 1991, ‘Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking’,Human Relations 44, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
  19. Perrow, C.: 1984,Normal Accidents (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  20. Pitre, E.: 1990, ‘Emotional Control’, working paper, the Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  21. Swigert, V. L. and Farrell, R. A.: 1980–81, ‘Corporate Homicide: Definitional Processes in the Creation of Deviance’,Law and Society Review 15, pp. 170–183.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, S. E. and Crocker, J.: 1981, ‘Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing’, in E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (eds.),Social Cognition 1 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 89–134.Google Scholar
  23. Trevino, L.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Academy of Management Review 11, pp. 601–617.Google Scholar
  24. Trevino, L.: 1992, ‘Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education and Management’,Journal of Business Ethics 11, 445–459.Google Scholar
  25. Valasquez, M., Moberg, D. J. and Cavanaugh, G. F.: 1983, ‘Organizational Statesmanship and Dirty Politics: Ethical Guidelines for the Organizational Politician’,Organizational Dynamics (Autumn), pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
  26. Van Maanen, J.: 1978, ‘People Processing: Strategies of Organizational Socialization’,Organizational Dynamics (Summer), pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis A. Gioia
    • 1
  1. 1.Smeal College of Business AdministrationPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations